「latency」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Embedded Systems Engineer. Use when a task calls for Embedded Systems Engineer judgment. Reasons from hardware timing, interrupt latency, memory maps, and deterministic WCET resource bounds through DWT CYCCNT and Saleae logic-analyzer timing proofs, SWD/JTAG (J-Link/OpenOCD) with CFSR/HFSR/BFAR fault decode, FreeRTOS/Zephyr respecting configMAX_SYSCALL_INTERRUPT_PRIORITY, MISRA C:2012 and ISO 26262 ASIL discipline, Nordic PPK2 power profiling, and MCUboot signed OTA while treating priority inversion, Cortex-M7 uncached-DMA D-cache incoherence, CAN bus-off, I2C NACK storms, and brownout-during-flash-write NVS corruption as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Database Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Database Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from storage hierarchy, concurrency semantics, query-optimization theory, and declared workload models through TPC-C/H, YCSB, and JOB benchmarks, Jepsen/Elle correctness checkers, and perf/blktrace/fio profiling while treating cardinality-estimation plan regressions, tail-latency spikes under skew, unfair fsync-disabled speedups, and benchmark-trick wins as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Distributed Systems Researcher. Use when a task calls for Distributed Systems Researcher judgment. Reasons from failure models, consistency contracts, and tail-latency-and-recovery performance through TLA+ model checking, Jepsen and Porcupine linearizability checking, and YCSB/DeathStarBench benchmarking with iptables and kill -9 fault injection, while treating unbounded leases and split-brain, clock skew under NTP, and GC-induced p99 spikes as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and scope production work with Odyssey's real-time interactive video world models (odyssey.ml — Odyssey-1/Odyssey-2/Starchild-1/Agora-1). Use when a request involves generating video that a user steers live with keyboard, text, speech, or controller input (streamed frames that respond in the moment), or when someone must decide between Odyssey-style interactive generation and offline clip generators (Sora/Veo/Kling) or downloadable 3D / game engines. Covers what is verified versus announced, current access routes, latency and coherence limits, feasible-now versus speculative use cases, pricing/access terms, and content/rights considerations. This is a fast-moving research-stage product; the skill teaches honest scoping, not a promise of production reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, configure, and ship production voice agents on the ElevenLabs Agents platform (branded "ElevenAgents," formerly "Conversational AI"). Use when an agent must design a spoken-conversation system prompt, pick an LLM and TTS voice/model for a real-time voice bot, wire client/server/system tools and knowledge-base RAG, connect a channel (WebRTC/WebSocket SDK, embeddable widget, or telephony via Twilio/SIP), tune turn-taking and latency, set up simulation testing and evaluation, or reason about pricing, concurrency, and the consent/disclosure obligations of a synthetic voice talking to real people. Not for plain non-conversational text-to-speech, dubbing, or music generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Resemble AI Chatterbox for text-to-speech and voice-cloning workflows, including local open-weight Chatterbox, Chatterbox Multilingual, Chatterbox Turbo, and Resemble-hosted Chatterbox API routes. Apply when an agent must choose a Chatterbox variant, prepare reference-voice inputs, control emotion/paralinguistic delivery, plan multilingual TTS, handle PerTh watermarking, or make production decisions about consent, privacy, licensing, latency, and audio QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to plan, direct, troubleshoot, and hand off provider-independent live or hybrid livestream event productions, including run of show, crew, capture, audio, graphics, switching, guests, encoding, ingest, transport choices, latency, redundancy, accessibility, moderation, monitoring, incidents, recording, and delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add fast, local, typed decisions to any project with Laya, an open-source non-generative decision model (pip install laya). It classifies, routes, scores and answers yes/no questions about a piece of text, returning calibrated probabilities in roughly 20-35 ms on a laptop GPU, with no LLM call and no data leaving the machine. Use this skill whenever the user wants to classify or route text, triage tickets or emails, detect spam, phishing, toxicity or intent, put a guardrail in front of an agent or LLM, score something against a rubric, or replace an LLM-based classifier to cut latency or cost. Also use it when they mention Laya, Jev, a "System 1 model", "typed decisions" or a "decision model", even if they never name Laya.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script. Covers when intent-driven beats scripted, making agent runs deterministic (pinned model, temperature 0, seeded data, bounded steps, explicit success assertion, snapshot-not-pixel), cost/latency control, the accessibility-tree-first interaction model, CI gating, and graduating a stable run into a scripted Playwright test. Use when: "agentic browser test," "goal-driven browser test," "let an agent explore the app," "natural-language E2E," "browser agent smoke test," "Playwright MCP test." Not for: Writing/maintaining deterministic scripted Playwright tests — that is playwright-automation. Testing your product's OWN LLM features — that is ai-system-testing. Related: playwright-automation, ai-system-testing, exploratory-testing, test-reliability, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Serverless vector database at the edge with Cloudflare Vectorize. Use when: building semantic search on Cloudflare Workers, RAG pipelines at the edge, low-latency vector similarity search, or storing and querying embeddings without managing a separate vector database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cerebras Inference is a hosted LLM API that runs open models on Cerebras wafer-scale chips at thousands of tokens per second, through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Use when a user wants the lowest-latency chat, code completion or agent loop, asks how to call the Cerebras API or SDK, needs streaming, tool calling, strict JSON schema output or reasoning control, or hits a "model not found" error from a retired Cerebras model ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the engineering and research philosophies of Jeff Dean, Chief Scientist at Google DeepMind and Google Research. Reach for this skill whenever you are designing large-scale distributed systems, optimizing latency and energy efficiency, or making architectural decisions about machine learning infrastructure. It should trigger automatically for topics involving hardware-ML co-design, model distillation, sparse activation, massively multi-task models, or scaling systems by 5x to 10x. Use this skill to evaluate system bottlenecks, transition from specialized to unified models, and optimize experimental velocity. Apply his mental models to avoid premature 100x scaling and to treat AI models as reasoning engines rather than memorization databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate unexpected behavior and mysterious bugs. Use when the cause of a problem is unknown and the user needs to understand WHY something is happening — symptoms like: sudden unexplained changes in metrics or behavior, works locally but not in staging/production, inconsistent or intermittent failures, correct code producing wrong results, operations succeeding but having no effect, environment-specific failures, duplicate executions, stale data, or any "why did this change?" or "why is this happening?" situation. Covers infrastructure anomalies (cache hit rates dropping, latency spikes, queue behavior shifts) as well as code bugs. The key signal is confusion about root cause, not a request to implement a known fix. Do NOT use for feature requests, known fixes, planning, or documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and improves measured latency, throughput, memory, CPU, bundle, rendering, query, or resource performance by defining a target, profiling a representative workload, locating the bottleneck, making one change at a time, and comparing before/after evidence. Use for performance work or regressions. Not for guessing optimizations without a reproducible workload or for generic refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses slow services and regressions via profiling and tail-latency math. Use when diagnosing slow services, profiling hot paths, or judging whether an optimization is real.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM serving for latency, batching, caching, quantization, and routing. Use when tuning vLLM or SGLang, sizing KV cache, adding speculative decoding, or cutting serving cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds production voice bots and IVR with Python STT/TTS pipelines. Use when designing telephony, streaming audio, latency budgets, or voice quality monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses pipeline performance issues -- slow jobs, expensive queries, latency trends -- using Monte Carlo's cross-platform observability. Uses a tiered investigation approach: discover problems, bridge to affected tables, then drill into root causes. Activates when a user asks about slow pipelines, expensive queries, or performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshoots Monte Carlo AI agent alerts and traces — eval score drops, latency/token spikes, trajectory and validation breaches. Not for data incidents (monte-carlo-analyze-root-cause) or monitor creation (monte-carlo-monitoring-advisor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug RPC provider health issues for a chain. Use when alerts mention RPC failures, high latency, stale blocks, or provider errors. Diagnoses the issue and recommends fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map current AI safety controls — filter inventory, coverage gaps, latency impact, incident history. Use when asked "what AI safety controls do we have", "find guardrail coverage gaps", or "map our filters".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose runtime infrastructure issues — cold starts, timeouts, scaling problems, network failures. Use when asked about "infra is slow", "cold starts", "network issues", "why is this timing out", "scaling problem", "latency spikes", or "service is down".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit embedding infrastructure — model drift, index freshness, query latency, coverage gaps. Use when asked to "audit our embeddings", "is our index stale", or "find embedding coverage gaps".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。