「model quality」の検索結果

Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating a decision through Charlie Munger-style mental models: inversion, incentives, quality filters, multidisciplinary reasoning, and concentrated judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an evaluation plan for an LLM or AI feature before shipping it. Use when asked how to evaluate a prompt/model/agent, set up an eval harness, define quality metrics for an AI feature, or build a regression gate. Produces an eval plan — task definition, datasets, metrics & rubrics, baselines, automated + human evals, a pass bar, and a regression gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CP-7 retrospective: audit checkpoints, evidence quality, action items, and harvest candidates. Closes the V-model cycle and feeds the next run. Use via /retro after ship, escalate, or significant session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidelines for making .NET libraries and applications trimming-safe and Native AOT compatible. Covers the trimming/AOT model, the MSBuild properties that enable analysis (IsTrimmable, IsAotCompatible, PublishTrimmed, PublishAot), the trimming attributes (RequiresUnreferencedCode, RequiresDynamicCode, DynamicallyAccessedMembers, UnconditionalSuppressMessage), IL2xxx/IL3xxx warning codes, and a pattern playbook: source generators and UnsafeAccessor, generated-interception diagnostic suppressors, intentional runtime scanning boundaries, trimming-safe islands and feature switches, migration analyzers, and temporary warning-approval baselines. Use when introducing trimming/AOT support, resolving IL2xxx/IL3xxx warnings, or making reflection-heavy code trimming-safe in C# / .NET codebases. For System.Text.Json AOT scenarios, see also the serialization skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidelines for introducing and using nullable reference types (NRT) and System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis nullable attributes in C# / .NET codebases. Covers the nullability model, flow analysis, the null-forgiving operator, API design rules, the full attribute catalog (AllowNull, DisallowNull, MaybeNull, NotNull, NotNullWhen, MaybeNullWhen, NotNullIfNotNull, MemberNotNull, MemberNotNullWhen, DoesNotReturn, DoesNotReturnIf), the C# 14 field keyword, incremental migration of legacy codebases, and a code-generation checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate AI images using Gemini or GPT APIs directly. Covers model selection (Gemini for scenes; GPT Image 2 for text rendering, batch variations, multi-reference compositing; GPT Image 1.5 for transparent icons), the 5-part prompting framework, API calling patterns, multi-turn editing, and quality assurance. Produces photorealistic scenes, icons, illustrations, OG images, posters, infographics, and product shots. Use when building websites that need images, creating marketing assets, or generating visual content. Triggers: 'generate image', 'ai image', 'create hero image', 'make an icon', 'generate illustration', 'create og image', 'poster', 'infographic', 'image variations', 'gpt-image-2', 'ai art', 'image generation'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or extending video with Google Veo models on Scenario via MCP: text-to-video, image-to-video from a first frame, first and last frame transitions, reference-to-video (R2V) with asset or style reference images, native audio with dialogue, sound effects, and ambience, negative prompts, seeded reruns, extending a 16:9 clip, or choosing a quality, fast, or lite tier. Keywords: Veo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Fast, Veo 3.1 Lite, Extend Video, Google, T2V, I2V, V2V, 720p, 1080p.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or editing images with OpenAI's GPT Image models on Scenario via MCP: text-to-image, edits from reference images, inpainting with an alpha mask, in-image text for logos and infographics, transparent cutouts, pixel sizing up to 4K, quality tiers up to xhigh and max, input fidelity for product or face detail, or choosing between Flare, Sunburst, GPT Image 2 and 1.5. Keywords: GPT Image 2.5, GPT Image 2, OpenAI, DALL-E, gpt-image, ChatGPT image, txt2img, img2img, background.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating 3D assets with Rodin Hyper3D models on Scenario via MCP: image-to-3D from up to five multiview stills, text-to-3D from a prompt, fast prototyping versus full quality tiers, quad or triangle topology, PBR materials, HighPack 4K textures, T-pose or A-pose characters for rigging, or splitting a finished mesh into parts and retexturing it with Bang!. Keywords: Rodin Gen-2.5, Hyper3D, Deemos, image to 3D, text to 3D, part segmentation, texture delight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or editing music with ACE-Step models on Scenario via MCP: text-to-music songs with sung vocals from a lyric sheet, instrumental tracks, covering or restyling an existing song, repainting one section in place, changing sung lyrics, adding an instrument layer, completing a partial recording into a full arrangement, extracting stems, or choosing between Turbo and Quality lanes. Keywords: ACE-Step 1.5, cover strength, repaint, Vocal2BGM, stem separation, karaoke, BPM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eng manager-mode plan review. Scope challenge, architecture review, code quality review, detailed test coverage diagram, performance review. Produces test plan artifact for downstream QA. Optional cross-model outside voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test and evaluation harness for AI agents — scenario suites, deterministic replay, regression diffing, cost and latency budgets. Use when agent quality is vibe-checked, before shipping a prompt or model change, or when evals drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to build an evaluation system for an LLM/agent application but doesn't know where to start — they have traces, prompts, RAG pipelines, or nothing at all. Also use when the user mentions evaluation, eval, benchmarking, testing LLM quality, measuring agent performance, assessing RAG accuracy, or wants to compare prompts/models. This skill is the entry router: it asks diagnostic questions then recommends which sub-skill (local workflow) to use next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。