「observation」の検索結果

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before removing code that looks redundant, wasteful, or "wrong" based on log observations or code review instinct, grep the test suite for tests whose names describe the exact behavior you're about to remove. A test whose title literally describes the "weird" thing (e.g. "calls play() even when player reports playing", "retries even when first call succeeded", "skips cache even when fresh") is a load-bearing workaround, and the production log you're reacting to is probably the workaround working as designed — not a bug. Use when: (1) Tempted to remove a function call that "looks redundant" based on a production log, (2) About to "simplify" a conditional that seems to always take the same branch, (3) Reviewing code and thinking "why would anyone write this?", (4) A log line shows a state that seems impossible or contradictory (e.g. playing=true but positionMs=0 for seconds), (5) CI surfaces a failing test whose name describes exactly what your fix removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch and drive an isolated World of Warcraft 1.12.1 client against a local Thistle Tea server, including keyboard input, left/right clicks, camera drags, screenshots, real instance entry, log observation, and Tidewave runtime probes. Use for real-client gameplay acceptance, client-sensitive protocol or movement verification, reproducing live bugs, checking visibility and instance isolation, or validating a scripted content chain beyond automated tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Geotechnical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Geotechnical Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress and LRFD/EC7 limit states through GDR/GBR/FDR deliverables, shallow and deep foundations (GEC 6/10/12), excavation support (DeepEX, LPILE), ground improvement, ASCE 7 liquefaction, observational-method triggers, and FHWA pile acceptance while treating DSC claims, setup vs. blow count, and GBR-vs-design conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Clinical Epidemiologist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Epidemiologist judgment. Clinical epidemiology expert for causal study design, observational bias control, GRADE/EBM synthesis, and principled reporting (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Astronomer. Use when a task calls for Astronomer judgment. Reasons like a senior observational astronomer from the telescope and catalog outward — Landolt/Stetson photometry, Gaia/MPC astrometry, Horizons ephemerides, SDSS–ZTF–Rubin survey discipline, TOPCAT cross-matches, and calibrated detection vs upper-limit reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Astrophysicist. Use when a task calls for Astrophysicist judgment. Reasons like a senior astrophysicist across observational, computational, and multi-messenger work — from radiative transfer and error budgets through JWST/ALMA/Rubin/LIGO pipelines, VO archives, and calibrated detection vs upper-limit reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA test a live website with Firecrawl browser and scrape evidence. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defines God Committee member behavior and responsibilities with oversight authority. Use when operating as a committee member. Triggers on: god committee, committee observation, council discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize qualitative research data into an affinity diagram with themes, clusters, and insight statements. Use when synthesizing large amounts of qualitative data from interviews, observations, or surveys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

获取并计算指标的基础观测数据，包括时间周期确定、指标聚合、衍生指标计算和维度交叉展示表构建。当需要对指标进行基础数据观测、获取当期值与变动幅度时调用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about nutritional epidemiology, dietary guidelines, chronic disease prevention, or public health policy. It channels the thinking of Meir J. Stampfer, epidemiologist and nutrition expert at Harvard University. Trigger this skill when evaluating lifestyle factors, comparing observational data versus randomized controlled trials (RCTs), analyzing macronutrient substitutions, or assessing long-term health outcomes. Stampfer's approach is essential when users ask about "good" vs. "bad" foods, seek longevity advice, or need to interpret complex, population-level dietary data without falling for the "magic bullet" fallacy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill applies the analytical frameworks of Ronald C. Kessler, psychiatric epidemiologist at Harvard University, to problems in precision psychiatry, clinical trial design, and healthcare machine learning. Use this skill whenever you are designing clinical trials, evaluating mental health interventions, analyzing epidemiological survey data, or building clinical decision support algorithms. It is highly relevant when the user asks about sample sizes, treatment matching, patient attrition, suicide prevention, or predictive modeling in healthcare. Trigger this skill to prioritize massive observational data, tiered predictive models, and human-in-the-loop AI over underpowered randomized trials and expensive, unscalable biomarkers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to reason like Martin Heidegger, 20th-century German philosopher and author of Being and Time. Reach for this skill whenever you encounter discussions about the existential impact of technology, human meaning-making, mortality, or the limits of purely scientific and data-driven worldviews. Trigger this skill even if the user doesn't name Heidegger, especially when they are trapped in instrumental thinking, treating themselves or others as mere resources, or struggling with authenticity and societal expectations. Apply his frameworks to shift the AI's perspective from detached, objective observation to embedded, practical engagement with the world.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to reason like JoAnn E. Manson, epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School and women's health expert. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating hormone replacement therapy (HRT), menopause management, nutritional epidemiology, dietary supplements, or clinical trial methodology. Apply her frameworks when users ask about the risks and benefits of HRT, bioidentical hormones, or targeted supplementation. Reach for this skill to differentiate between symptom management and chronic disease prevention, or when assessing observational data versus randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in public health contexts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the rigorous epidemiological reasoning of Julie E. Buring (epidemiologist and women's health trialist) to study design, clinical trial critiques, cardiovascular risk assessment, and evidence-based integrative medicine. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating medical literature, designing cohort studies or RCTs, assessing conflicting research findings, or analyzing cardiovascular risk factors (especially in women). Reach for this when users ask about the validity of supplements, the discrepancy between observational and randomized data, or how to future-proof a clinical registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA test a live website with Firecrawl browser and scrape evidence. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relationship-first networking skill for identifying the right people to connect with and drafting value-add outreach — not sales, not referral asks. Use when building a network for a job search, career pivot, partnership, or industry access. Covers target identification by purpose, deep LinkedIn + web research on a specific person, brainstorming 10 value-add angles, and drafting three outreach formats: cold networking email (max 200 words), LinkedIn connection request (max 300 characters), and hiring manager follow-up email (120–160 words). Never drafts generic openers or referral asks — always leads with a specific observation and genuine value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /office-hours. YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a pedagogical documentation protocol for making children's learning processes visible and shareable. Use when documenting learning, communicating with families, or planning next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Slow down interpretation from observation to action. Use when students or adults need to examine assumptions in conflict, dialogue, or inquiry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-informant assessment approaches for dispositional competencies like curiosity or resilience. Use when assessing character strengths or competencies that written tests cannot capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author learning targets for a competency across developmental bands with precise, observable progression language. Use when writing 'I can' statements for competency-based programmes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。