「polymarket」の検索結果

Handle production incidents — triage, mitigate, communicate, and write postmortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore PostHog's Inbox — the surface where signal reports surface as actionable issues and trends. Use when the user asks "what's in my inbox?", "what should I look at?", "which reports are actionable?", "what's PostHog flagged recently?", asks about a specific report by ID or title, or wants to see which signal sources are configured. Covers listing, filtering, and drilling into reports, plus pointers to the deeper `signals` skill when raw signals or semantic search are needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate PostHog error tracking issues that are the same actual error reported under different fingerprints. Use when the user asks "why do I have so many TypeError issues that look the same?", "merge these duplicates", "stop splitting this error into new issues", or wants to clean up fingerprint sprawl. Decides between a one-shot merge of existing issues and a durable grouping rule that keeps future events from creating new fingerprints. Does NOT group conceptually similar bugs across different runtimes, SDKs, or call sites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep iterating on code changes until the tests pass, the build succeeds, or linting is clean. Runs in a tight loop of fix → run → check → repeat. Use when you want the agent to autonomously grind through test failures or build errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any 'grill' trigger phrases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or edit images using the OpenAI Image API (gpt-image-2). Use when the user asks to generate, create, draw, render, illustrate, mock up, or edit an image, icon, logo, mockup, illustration, OG image, blog hero, marketing asset, or similar visual. Also use when the user supplies a reference image and asks to modify, restyle, or remix it. Triggers on: "generate an image", "create an image", "make a picture of", "edit this image", "restyle this", "make a mockup of", "draw a", "render a", "illustration of".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep. TRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan running terminals for dev server URLs (localhost ports), report them, and optionally open the app in Cursor's built-in browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Crawl all links in a file or project, test each for a valid HTTP response, report broken ones, and fix or remove them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Cursor's browser to fill and submit every form in the app with valid and invalid data, verifying validation, error states, and success flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one. Helps with aesthetic direction, typography, and making choices that don't read as templated defaults.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right y-axis unit when creating or updating a TrendsQuery insight via `posthog:insight-create` or `posthog:insight-update`. Use when the agent is about to add a `formula` purely to convert units (e.g. dividing seconds by 60 to display minutes), when a `math_property` is a duration, currency, ratio, or large count, or whenever the user mentions "format the y-axis", "duration", "seconds", "minutes", "hours", "milliseconds", "ms", "percentage", "currency", "decimals", "axis label", or "axis unit" in the context of a graph insight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides a user from "I want to watch recordings but don't know which ones" to a short, high-signal list of sessions worth watching. Use when the user asks which sessions or replays to watch, wants help finding interesting / useful recordings, says they don't know where to start in session replay, or wants to watch sessions about a goal (signup, pricing, onboarding, checkout, a feature, rageclicks, errors, mobile, a specific person) without naming exact filters. Turns a vague intent into a focused RecordingsQuery via `query-session-recordings-list`, then deep-links the best few and hands off to `investigating-replay`. Do NOT use when the user already has a recording/session ID (use investigating-replay) or wants the replay for a known error issue (use finding-replay-for-issue).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the most informative session recording linked to an error tracking issue. Use when a user has an error tracking issue ID and wants to watch a replay showing what the user was doing when the error occurred. Ranks linked sessions by recency, activity score, and journey completeness, then summarizes the pre-error context. Replaces blind session picking from potentially hundreds of linked recordings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a recent time window. Use when the user asks "what flags were deleted in the last N days", "show me recently deleted feature flags", "who deleted flag X", "audit recent flag deletions", or anything similar. Handles the non-obvious gotcha that system.feature_flags exposes the deleted boolean but does not expose a deletion timestamp — the actual deleted-at time lives in the per-flag activity log and must be cross-referenced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。