「product question」の検索結果

Find the most valuable commercial insight and the monetization point closest to lawful revenue for a project, product, service, website, community, content account, open-source tool, or business idea. Use when a user asks how to monetize, who pays, why people do not buy, what to charge, whether to keep building, what to stop, what to do next, or asks to continue or deepen an earlier business analysis. Answer the user's actual question before asking for more information and carry the analysis forward without repeating it. When the buyer, purchased result, or delivery ability is unknown, do not select them from industry stereotypes; use explicit conditional candidates and an evidence-gathering next step. Not for investment advice, income forecasts, get-rich-quick schemes, or guaranteed results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles). Handles creating new context documents, loading existing ones, and enriching them with new decisions. Use when starting a new feature, resuming work, making technical decisions, resolving questions, or when context needs to persist across sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'load context', 'update context', 'context doc', 'decisions', 'continue where we left off', 'what did we decide', or 'capture this decision'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Five-phase pipeline (triage → clarify → research → PRD → plan) that turns a raw idea into four linked files: clarifying questions, deep research, a PRD with non-goals and metrics, and a phased execution plan with mermaid user journey and kill criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The practice of collecting, analyzing, and acting on data to drive product decisions. Great analytics isn't about dashboards—it's about insights that lead to action. Every metric should answer a question that changes behavior. This skill covers event tracking, metrics design, dashboards, user behavior analysis, and data-driven decision making. The best analytics teams measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. Use when "analytics, metrics, tracking, dashboard, funnel, cohort, retention, events, KPI, measure, data, insights, conversion, engagement, analytics, metrics, data, dashboards, tracking, funnels, cohorts, KPIs, insights" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edits existing marketing copy in ordered passes (structure, claims, sentences, consistency, proof) and returns the edited text with a change log and a list of questions for the author. Flags claims that need evidence instead of inventing proof, and keeps the writer's voice. Use when someone says "edit this copy", "proofread this page", "tighten this", "polish this email", "review my landing page copy", "make this clearer", "check this before we publish", or asks for copy feedback on a page, ad, email or product description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned content-strategy discipline for audience questions, content pillars, topic clusters, editorial priorities, cadence, distribution, refreshes, and stop-doing decisions. Use when deciding what to publish, why it deserves resources, and how the portfolio compounds. NOT FOR: writing an individual asset (use suede-copy), technical or on-page SEO audits (use suede-seo-audit), or social-channel production (use suede-social).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews logs, metrics, traces, alerts, correlation, dashboards, and diagnostic instrumentation so failures and performance changes can be detected and explained at component boundaries. Use for observability work, incident readiness, instrumentation, or production diagnostics. Not for fixing a specific incident before reproducing it or for adding noisy logging without an operational question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /office-hours. YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate evidence-first engineering for WeChat and other mini programs from a vague idea or existing repository through project discovery, product specification, architecture, implementation, debugging, device adaptation, verification, and release readiness. Use when users ask to build a mini program from zero to one, take over an existing mini-program project, deliver a cross-stage feature, diagnose project status, coordinate development and testing, or judge whether a mini program is ready to upload or release. Enforces fact discovery, change boundaries, stage gates, evidence-calibrated status, sensitive-information redaction, and continuity after side questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as the team's Scrum Master of record, or copilot to a human one: plan sprints, run daily pulses, close sprints, prepare and follow up retrospectives, track and escalate impediments, and detect process anti-patterns across sprint history. Use whenever the user asks for Scrum or agile process help, in any language — "plan the sprint", "chuẩn bị retro", "how is the sprint going", "our velocity dropped", "track this blocker", "the same problem keeps coming back" — even without the word "Scrum", and whenever `_project/scrum-master/` exists and the question touches sprints, ceremonies, impediments, or team process health. Not for delivery dates and budget (project-manager) or deciding what to build (product-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and spec an analytical dashboard — define the question each chart answers, write the SQL queries, spec the layout and refresh cadence. Produces a complete dashboard spec ready to implement. Use when asked to "build a dashboard", "analytics dashboard", "BI dashboard", "weekly product health", or "visualize this data".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US engineering firms — civil, structural, MEP, mechanical, electrical, geotechnical, transportation, environmental, and manufacturing. **For real-world engineering (buildings, infrastructure, manufacturing) — NOT software engineering.** Triggers on "find civil engineering firms in Florida for transportation", "shortlist three structural engineering firms with high-rise experience", "MEP consultancy for a hospital project", or "pull contact info for these 12 engineering firm domains", even when described indirectly (PE-stamped drawings, building-permit review). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer software-dev / "engineering team" / SaaS-architecture asks to find-software-developer. Skip in-house engineering-manager hires, DIY questions, software-product comparisons (Revit, AutoCAD), non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US public-relations and communications agencies — media relations, crisis comms, investor relations (IR), product-launch PR, tech/startup PR, healthcare PR, B2B PR, public affairs, brand reputation, and internal communications. Triggers on "find me a tech PR agency in NY", "shortlist three IR firms for our IPO", "we need crisis comms help for a brand reputation issue", or "pull contact info for these 10 PR firm domains", even when described indirectly (we need press, get us into TechCrunch, manage our brand reputation). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope is broader marketing beyond PR/comms. Skip in-house PR/comms hires, "write me a press release" DIY asks, PR-software comparisons (Cision, Muck Rack), influencer-marketplace questions, non-US firms, individual freelance PR people.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US web development firms — building, refreshing, or rebuilding marketing sites, landing pages, ecommerce, WordPress/Webflow/Shopify, headless CMS, microsites, and web frontend work. Triggers on "find a web developer for a marketing landing page", "shortlist three Webflow agencies in California", "rebuild our ecommerce site on Shopify", or "pull contact info for these 8 web dev shop domains", even when described indirectly (redesign and rebuild our site, ship a microsite). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-software-developer for custom backend/API/mobile/internal-tool work — anything beyond a website. Defer to find-marketing-agency when scope spans broader marketing beyond the build. Skip in-house web-engineer hires, "how do I build X" DIY questions, hosting/CMS-product comparisons, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US AI/ML/data consulting firms (consultancies) — AI/ML development, MLOps, generative AI / LLM apps (RAG, chatbots, agents), computer vision, NLP, recommendation systems, data engineering, BI/analytics. Triggers on "find an AI/ML consulting firm to build our recommendation engine", "shortlist three RAG/LLM consultancies for an enterprise chatbot", "compare three AI/ML consulting firms with strong ratings", or "pull contact info for these 8 AI consultancy domains", even when described indirectly (we want to use AI for X, deploy ML to production). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Defer to find-software-developer for general app/backend work where AI is just a feature. Skip in-house ML/data hires, LLM/AI-tool comparisons (ChatGPT vs Claude), "how do I fine-tune X" DIY questions, AI courses for individuals, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 高教社杯/CUMCM mathematical modeling work needs lightweight reusable paper assets, national-prize style paragraph templates, section controls, per-question code/plot/test scaffolds, evidence registries, paper fragments, reproduction scripts, or safe reuse of prior contest project structure without copying old problem-specific content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer Aperture Wallet questions from first-party product, security, network, release, app-screen, and Journal sources while enforcing explicit wallet-secret and no-transaction safety boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explainability (XAI) audit for products containing AI components. Five-stage tier-scaled check: risk classification, stakeholder×question matrix, fidelity audit, system card, recourse path. Honest about what was validated functionally vs what needs user testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct an adaptive interactive interview on any topic and produce a structured markdown report, summary, or implementation plan. Use when the user says "interview me", "interview me about", "run an interview on", "help me think through", or wants guided discovery on any subject. Also triggers on "talk me through", "explore X with me", "help me plan Y", or "walk me through my thinking on Z" when the user wants a guided conversation rather than a direct answer. Applies broadly — career decisions, project ideas, product direction, personal goals, research questions, team problems — not just technical topics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds credible TAM/SAM/SOM analysis with external validation and sensitivity testing for startup fundraising: top-down, bottom-up, or both. Use when the user asks to size a market or check market claims and gives something to size: a product or service description, a market segment, or a deck with TAM/SAM/SOM claims. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes and searches the web, 30 or more with a large data room or a revision round, so for a passing question about market size, answer briefly in chat and offer the analysis instead of starting it. When it runs, every figure is externally sourced and stress-tested, never estimated from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert PE review of a submittal (shop drawings, product data, samples, equipment brochures) against specs, drawings, code questions and trade coordination. Produces findings with both sources, trade routing and a completeness gate. Triggers: 'review submittal', 'review shop drawings'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。