「proposal」の検索結果

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数のスキルに共通する行動原則を抽出し、既存ルールとの重複や不足を確認します。根拠と修正文案を示し、利用者の承認後にルールファイルへ反映するスキルです。

• スキル追加後のルール見直し
• 繰り返し現れる原則をまとめたいとき
• 既存ルールの不足や古い記述の確認

判断が必要な課題を一文で整理し、三つの選択肢の長所・短所と推奨案をまとめます。完了条件と実行手順も添え、チームに共有する提案づくりを支えます。

• 技術的な判断の選択肢を比較したいとき
• チームに共有する提案づくり
• ツールや移行方針の比較

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to review a plan, challenge a proposal, run a CEO review, poke holes in an approach, think bigger about scope, or decide whether to expand or reduce the plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reflect on another agent's recent execution record and propose the smallest durable instruction, skill, or tool-description change. Use for evidence-backed coaching proposals, never hot-swaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A grant proposal on CRISPR base-editing for sickle-cell disease — the hypothesis, the approach, the milestones, and the risk. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for grant review committee.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A municipal urban-tree-canopy policy proposal — the public need, the evidence, the options, and the funding decision. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for city council, agency reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A public-transit funding proposal for a city council — ridership need, the plan, the risk controls, and the ask. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for city council, public board.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenDesign renewal + seat-expansion business case for a growing customer: realized value, usage proof, and the expansion ROI. Built as a decision-grade B2B sales deck for champion, finance approver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional DOCX document creation and editing using OpenXML SDK. Useful for branded reports, polished proposals, and template-based authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose a new OpenSpec change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation. Also use when the user says "openspec propose" or "opsx propose".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, editing, or reviewing a document for the user (Word, Google Docs, or a document delivered as PDF), or when the task calls for a standalone written deliverable such as a memo, report, proposal, or brief. Also use to answer questions that require inspecting an existing document; not for a short chat reply, message draft, or quick rewrite that can stay in chat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a goal as a project: you coordinate. Use for "agents <task>", "take this to done", "work on this in parallel", "what are my threads doing", "pick up <slug>", "resume <slug>", "keep going until it is merged". Under `/agents` you do the work yourself unless it needs several lanes or a long wait — you judge; the plan line says why. No target you could verify (a file, API, number or measure) → the grill interview first, not threads. Read this skill before proposing anything for `/agents`: without it a proposal is in-session subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter, letter, contract, policy, form, template, worksheet, essay, handbook, guide, how-to, cheat sheet, SOP or other writing to keep, share, collaborate on, send, submit, print or sign; a doc exports to Word, PDF, Markdown or Google Docs, so needing a file to send, attach, upload, submit or print is no reason to pick Word, and a file nobody asked for is a doc, not Word; a plan, comparison, summary or notes asked in chat stays in chat; a pasted claude.ai artifact link may be a doc: check with docs tools first; Word or another file format named, tracked changes wanted, or a .docx to change or use as a template → that format's skill): making one → if no docs-connector instructions are in context, call its `guide` (topic.instructions) first; then create the doc (headings only, no body) before any search, file read or plan, even with files attached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a release proposal

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss analysis,' 'why are we losing deals,' 'loss reasons,' 'how do I respond to this objection,' 'prospect just said,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps,' 'cold call script,' or 'voicemail script.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For public competitor comparison pages, see competitors. For running buyer interviews or churn research, see customer-research. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For the offer being sold (bonuses, guarantees, pricing structure), see offers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess the impact of a significant change during sprint execution across the PRD, epics, architecture, and UX documents, and produce a sprint change proposal. Use when the user says "correct course" or "propose sprint change"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Supports authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose, revise, or audit research proposals, opening reports, and research plans from supporting evidence. Use for 研究计划、开题报告、科研项目申请书. Invoked as researchwrite for compatibility; use nature-writing for general manuscript sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。