「pta」の検索結果

目標画像と実装した3Dシーンのスクリーンショットを比較し、構図・照明・質感を段階的に改善します。見た目の再現度を採点し、描画速度も確認しながら修正を重ねるスキルです。

• 目標画像に近い3Dシーンを作りたいとき
• ブラウザゲームの照明や質感を磨きたいとき
• 既存の3D作品の見た目を改善したいとき

Prove existing work meets acceptance conditions without expanding scope. Use for validation-only tasks, completion checks, focused gate runs, and last-mile proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For consulting delivery work: turn diagnosis, frameworks, and project work into a client-adoptable action plan. Built around the core query "consulting-final-deck", with engagement manager judgment, buyer-ready proof, and this outcome: accept the recommendation and commit owners to the roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train RuView models — camera-free WiFlow pose (10 sensor signals, no labels), camera-supervised pose (MediaPipe + ESP32 CSI → 92.9% PCK@20, ADR-079), RuVector contrastive embeddings (AETHER, ADR-024), domain generalization (MERIDIAN, ADR-027), local SNN environment adaptation, plus GPU training on GCloud and Hugging Face publishing. Use when building, fine-tuning, evaluating, or shipping a model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve Archify diagram accuracy, visual quality and complete authoring speed with fewer repairs. Use for generation experiments or evaluating changes to layout, routing, diagnostics, authoring instructions and acceptance rules against actual diagrams and agent traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or inspect the local Release-Green observer for an exact base or combined PR candidate, separating hard failures, advisory drift and incomplete evidence. Use for maintainer preflight; full CI acceptance remains a separate requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a scoped, read-only quality scan and report exact-candidate evidence, failures and frozen debt. Use for an ad-hoc gate sweep or release preparation; a static scan is not full release acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the SPARC Specification phase — gather requirements, define acceptance criteria, identify constraints, and store the spec in memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks an AI team run against its acceptance criteria using the evidence bundle. Use when the user asks whether the work is done or correct, or before completing a run. Separates verified evidence from agent claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a finished epic folder in the ticket tree against the evidence it left behind — the epic file, each ticket plan, diffs, commits — and produce a retrospective with sourced findings, action items, and an acceptance decision. Use when the user says "run a retrospective" or "lets retro the epic [epic]". Supports -H/--headless

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Cherry Studio critical-path system regression tasks through the repository-owned Playwright E2E workflow. Use for full regression, release acceptance, development-branch system validation, or a named cherry-regression-test task on GitHub-hosted macOS and Windows runners.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Version-aware guidance for PufferLib reinforcement-learning environments, vectorization, policies, PuffeRL training, evaluation, and safe checkpoint review. Covers the native 5.0 build and environment API, published 3.0.0 Gymnasium/PettingZoo adaptation, and a pinned historical 4.0 profile.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, executes, and documents validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and negotiates job offers. Decodes base, bonus, equity, sign-on, level and terms with unknowns kept unknown and each offer in its own currency, benchmarks against checkable pay data, finds true leverage, drafts one counter as email and call script, role-plays the recruiter, and handles the salary-expectations number, deadlines and extensions, "best and final", competing offers, counteroffers and written acceptance or decline. Country-aware (India CTC, 13th-month pay, public-sector scales). Use when the user says "I got an offer of...", "is this offer good", "should I negotiate", "how do I counter", "compare my offers", "what is my equity worth", "they asked my salary expectations", "they want an answer by Friday", "can I ask for more time", "should I accept" or "practice the negotiation call". Uses Reactive Resume MCP tools when connected. For logging the offer, its deadline and withdrawal notes, job-application-manager; for other interview answers, interview-prep.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for DPAPI masterkeys, vault blobs, browser credential stores, protected secrets, domain backup keys, and secret-to-acceptance replay chains. Use when the user asks to inspect DPAPI blobs or masterkeys, recover browser or vault credentials, trace DPAPI context or backup-key use, or explain how protected Windows secrets become accepted access or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Loft the shape before cutting steel — answer a design question that prose cannot settle by building a throwaway artifact: a pure logic module in a clickable shell, or structurally different UI variants behind one route. The captain reacts to the artifact; the answer folds into the decision; the artifact never docks. Use when a design question stalls in words, when a navigator map carries a loft ticket, or when a spec discussion reaches "we would have to see it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence. Agent-autonomous for facts and for actions covered by standing authorization; signed for every new judgment. Never merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic architecture survey — walks the module graph and reports ranked deepening candidates (shallow modules, hypothetical seams, logic behind the wrong seam). Survey, not rescue: it finds candidates and hands them to the captain; it never refactors on its own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort whose destination is unclear is routed to /ask-navigator before this pipeline starts). Humans own the checkpoints where there is no unique answer or the error cost is severe; agents continuously run everything repeatable and acceptable-by-evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write specs before code, define acceptance criteria, plan features before implementation, generate tests from specifications, or follow spec-first development practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。