「quest」の検索結果

Amazon Alexa for Shopping Q&A automation: submits questions to Amazon's Alexa/Rufus AI shopping assistant and collects response text; supports optional keyword search context (navigate to search results page before asking for category-specific answers). Use when user mentions Amazon Alexa, Rufus, Amazon shopping assistant, Amazon AI chat, ask Amazon, Amazon Q&A, automate Alexa questions, Rufus chatbot, Amazon assistant automation, collect Alexa responses, bulk question submission to Amazon, keyword search context, category research. Also applies to extracting Amazon product recommendations from conversational AI, automating repeated queries to Amazon's AI shopping feature, collecting Alexa shopping responses at scale, or market research within a specific product category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route C# and .NET requests to the exact installed specialist or smallest dotnet/skills marketplace plugin. USE FOR: "which specialist should own this" or "how do I add the skill" requests involving ASP.NET Core endpoints, Blazor, MAUI binding, Windows Forms specialist selection or installation, EF Core queries, test or framework migration, runtime CPU/allocation evidence, file-based C#, editor/compiler defects, a surviving MSBuild `.binlog`, or a plugin missing from `/skills`; also use for C# semantics when no narrower specialist exists. DO NOT USE FOR: requests that already name the exact installed specialist to invoke, or work unrelated to C# or .NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and assess datasets for a research question. Dispatches Explorer agents to search across data source categories, then Explorer-Critic to stress-test each candidate. Produces a ranked list with feasibility grades. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to identify or evaluate data sources — not to search for papers or run analysis. Triggers include: "find data", "what data should I use", "find a dataset for this", "where can I get data on X", "assess datasets", "what datasets exist for", "help me find data", "is there data on this", "what are my data options", "I need data for this project", or any request to locate empirical data sources for a research question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read and triage existing pull request review comments, or address them when requested. Use for PR comment requests or /pr-comments; use review to inspect code without existing reviewer feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a feature, change, or refactor through questions, then write a build prompt for another agent. Use for /ask-then-build or requests to ask questions before producing an implementation prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive ONE already selected open pull request in microsoft/apm to mergeable. Classifies copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] inline review, runs autopilot-pr-review-worker, folds (by default) every recommendation inside the PR's stated scope, pushes to the head branch or a superseding PR that preserves authorship via commit trailers, watches CI to green (`agent-merge` when that skill or `<agent_merge_state>` is present; otherwise `gh pr checks --watch`), and iterates under fixed caps until ready-to-merge, advisory-with-deferred, superseded, or blocked. Plan before any fold, push, or reviewer request. Never spawned by autopilot-pr-review-scheduler. That scheduler is advisory only. Invoke this skill by name when the caller asked to drive a PR to merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATES ONLY on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow: the user themselves saying ulw-plan, ulw plan, /skill:ulw-plan, or asking in their own words for a work plan before coding. NEVER self-activates: a bare ulw/ultrawork run, an agent-side routing decision, or reading this file is not a request, and the plan-gated reviewers (metis/momus) stay locked without a user request plus a written .omo/plans plan file. Explore-first planning consultant (Prometheus) that grounds in the codebase, asks only the forks exploration cannot resolve - or researches them to best practice when the intent is fuzzy - waits for explicit approval, then writes ONE decision-complete work plan a worker executes with zero further interview. Triggers: ulw-plan, ulw plan, plan this, make a plan, plan before coding, interview me, break this down, start planning, plan mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --all to skip area selection and discuss all gray areas interactively. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (Claude picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill for ANY future-oriented question. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", "Can [X] succeed?", "What's the future of X?", foresight analysis, scenario planning, STEEEP analysis, futures cone, prediction requests, or any question about a future outcome. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. Also activate when the user says "predict", "forecast", "what are the odds", "scenario analysis", or asks about competitive races, technology adoption, geopolitical shifts, or market dominance. REQUIRES web search to be enabled — if web search is unavailable, tell the user before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this agent for any future-oriented question that requires deep quantitative analysis, historical precedents, and structured scenario planning. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", prediction requests with high stakes, foresight analysis, STEEEP scenario planning, futures cone, competitive race analysis, technology adoption curves, geopolitical shifts, or any question about a future outcome that deserves rigorous multi-step analysis. This agent runs a 12-step deterministic pipeline: Claude handles intelligence, Python handles all arithmetic. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. REQUIRES: Bash tool + Python 3.x. Not compatible with claude.ai web (use Soft Predict Future instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a <cross-session-message> from another Claude session asks for a change in this repo (a new endpoint, a field, a client update, a package bump). Covers getting the user's go-ahead, filling gaps in the request, pushing back on the contract, and the reply shape the requester depends on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The reference agents' cache-stable request assembly, covering the static system and per-request context split, the fixed tool list, the rolling conversation breakpoint, which config fields are prompt bytes, and verification. Load when writing or reviewing a commerce agent's prompt assembly, when cache reads are zero, or when a turn's latency or cost is the question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys a Regional REST API with a custom domain name, a Lambda backend function, and a request-based Lambda authorizer using AWS CLI. Covers ACM certificate provisioning, API Gateway REST API creation, Lambda function deployment, request authorizer setup, custom domain configuration, base path mapping, and Route 53 DNS record creation. Trigger keywords: custom domain, REST API, Lambda, Route 53, API Gateway, regional endpoint, request authorizer, base path mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides general use of AWS messaging and streaming services. Covers Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon MQ, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Data Firehose, Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, and Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK). Use when reasoning about messaging and streaming patterns. Also identifies which AWS service owns each customer communication channel: email (Amazon SES), and WhatsApp, SMS, MMS, RCS, voice and mobile push (the AWS End User Messaging family of services). Routes the request to the specialized skill for that channel. Defers to the channel's specialized skill when the user already named a specific channel. In general, use specific skills or documentation searches for detailed service-specific questions. Do NOT use for MSK or Managed Service for Apache Flink questions, prefer specific skills. Does not configure customer communication channels; defers to specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a bounded CI contract gate for an Attio integration using fixtures, schema checks, and an optional read-only smoke request. Use when Attio changes need pull-request evidence without mutating CRM data. Trigger with "Attio CI", "test Attio integration", or "Attio pull request gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Attio REST API failures from status, structured error fields, endpoint contract, and request context without exposing customer data. Use when an Attio request returns 400, 401, 403, 404, 409, 422, 429, or 5xx. Trigger with "Attio error", "Attio request failed", or "debug Attio API".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle Apify API rate limits with proper backoff and request queuing. Use when hitting 429 errors, optimizing API request throughput, or implementing rate-aware client wrappers. Trigger with "apify rate limit", "apify throttling", "apify 429", "apify retry", "apify backoff", "too many requests apify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Apify datasets, key-value stores, and request queues programmatically, and orchestrate multi-Actor pipelines. Use when you need to read or write Apify datasets, export scraped data to CSV/JSON/XLSX, store config or binary artifacts in a key-value store, manage a resumable request queue, chain Actors into a scrape → transform → export pipeline, or monitor Actor run status and cost. Trigger with "apify dataset", "apify key-value store", "apify storage", "export apify data", "apify pipeline", "apify request queue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict. Based on Karpathy's LLM Council methodology. MANDATORY TRIGGERS: 'council this', 'run the council', 'war room this', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'debate this'. STRONG TRIGGERS (use when combined with a real decision or tradeoff): 'should I X or Y', 'which option', 'what would you do', 'is this the right move', 'validate this', 'get multiple perspectives', 'I can't decide', 'I'm torn between'. Do NOT trigger on simple yes/no questions, factual lookups, or casual 'should I' without a meaningful tradeoff (e.g. 'should I use markdown' is not a council question). DO trigger when the user presents a genuine decision with stakes, multiple options, and context that suggests they want it pressure-tested from multiple angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skip profile question when user explicitly refuses to answer. When user says 'I don't want to answer' or 'skip this question', use this tool to stop asking about that item.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WHAT: Draws a code change or part of a codebase as an animated architecture or data-flow diagram, on its own or in a pull request. WHEN: asked to diagram, visualise or explain a change or a system, or when a pull request should carry a diagram. KEYWORDS: PR Lens, diagram, architecture, data flow, visualise, visualize, pull request

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise Chinese social-media covers through the registered Skill-封面 asset system, reusable styles, presenter identities, ratio-specific layouts, and exact replacement prompts. Use only when the user explicitly says“skill-cover”“Skill-封面”“实战风格”, requests the registered style/gesture assets, asks for simultaneous 3:4 and 4:3 registered-layout output, replaces a reference cover's person with the current digital-human frame, or extends this registered cover system. Do not use for a generic“制作封面/生成封面”request; generic cover requests belong to dog-skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。