「question」の検索結果

Query the bundled research knowledge graph for methodology guidance. Routes questions through a 3-tier knowledge base — WHY (research claims), HOW (guidance docs), WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE (domain examples) — plus structured reference documents. Returns research-backed answers grounded in specific claims with practical application to the user's system. Triggers on "/ask", "/ask [question]", "why does my system...", "how should I...".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Business question on market, competitors, pricing: business research brief - turns a market, competitor, pricing, or customer question into a structured evidence-vs-inference brief; for raw link gathering use ulw-research, and for ongoing multi-role research use research-department. Use when the user says: research-brief, business-research, business research, research brief, decision brief, pricing decision brief, decision-ready brief, source-backed business research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] User named Jev for yes/no or pick-one probabilities: Jev ask: typed yes/no, pick-one, or scored questions to Jev with your own key; returns probabilities, never prose. Use when the user says: jev-ask, ask jev, jev question, jev score.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explaining how the business is doing, meaning why a metric moved, which segment drove it, pace against a comparable, progress against goals the operator has stated, and questions over sales, traffic, conversion, and customers or this operation's equivalents that the snapshot alone does not answer. Not needed when the snapshot's headline figures and their change on the prior period answer the question, how a period went included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers questions about a code repository using source file analysis. Use when the user asks a question about how something works, wants to understand a component, or needs help navigating the codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the wiki to answer questions. Searches wiki pages, synthesizes answers with citations, and optionally files valuable answers back as new wiki pages. Use when the user asks a question about the knowledge base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operates Amazon MSK Provisioned clusters (Standard and Express brokers). Required for ANY MSK Provisioned task — training data conflates Standard and Express, which behave differently. Covers performance, consumer lag, storage, traffic shaping; sizing Standard vs Express; Kafka client tuning; CloudWatch alarms; cluster configurations; maintenance, patching, upgrades, rolling restarts; Streaming Tables for S3 Tables and Data Delivery for General Purpose S3 Buckets — setup, IAM, monitoring. Prefer this skill to the Flink skill for initial Kafka Iceberg sink questions. Triggers: MSK Provisioned (Express/Standard), Kafka, `kafka.*` or `express.*` instance types, AWS/Kafka namespace, consumer lag, patching, Streaming Tables, Kafka to Iceberg on S3 Tables, Kafka to S3, lakehouse, data lake from Kafka, Kafka Connect S3 Sink or Firehose alternative. DO NOT USE for MSK Connect or Replicator — search documentation instead. Only use for Serverless for eligibility questions for S3 Tables/streaming tables/data delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides general use of AWS messaging and streaming services. Covers Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon MQ, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Data Firehose, Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, and Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK). Use when reasoning about messaging and streaming patterns. Also identifies which AWS service owns each customer communication channel: email (Amazon SES), and WhatsApp, SMS, MMS, RCS, voice and mobile push (the AWS End User Messaging family of services). Routes the request to the specialized skill for that channel. Defers to the channel's specialized skill when the user already named a specific channel. In general, use specific skills or documentation searches for detailed service-specific questions. Do NOT use for MSK or Managed Service for Apache Flink questions, prefer specific skills. Does not configure customer communication channels; defers to specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Talk to customers without leading them using Mom Test rules: discuss their life not your idea, ask about specifics in the past, and talk less. Use when the user mentions "customer interviews", "validate my idea", "users say they want it but dont buy", "leading questions", "The Mom Test", "customer feedback bias", or "interview script". Also trigger when preparing user-research questions, interpreting ambiguous feedback, or designing customer-discovery that avoids false positives. Covers commitment and advancement, avoiding compliments, and extracting signal from noise. For product-market fit, see jobs-to-be-done. For rapid prototype testing, see design-sprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from a raw app idea to a validated, cleanly architected first version that ships on a sustainable cadence. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - lean-startup, design-sprint, clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, clean-code, pragmatic-programmer, system-design, ios-hig-design, 37signals-way, software-design-philosophy - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, EXPERIMENTS.md, CREATE-APP-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to build a new app, validate an idea before writing code, architect an MVP that will not need a rewrite, or says 'help me build my app the right way'. App already exists: use improve-app or grow-app. Business idea not yet validated: run create-business first. Marketing site only: use create-website. Architecture-only question: design-code-architecture. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds questions and assessments that measure what they claim — matching item type to the thing being assessed, writing distractors that diagnose, and telling a question that measures learning from one that measures reading speed or test-taking. Use this to write or review assessment items, design a unit check or diagnostic, work out why scores do not match classroom performance, or decide how much evidence a claim about mastery actually needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers a business question with data without fooling yourself — framing the question so an answer would change something, choosing the right comparison, checking the data before trusting it, recognizing the traps that produce confident wrong answers (aggregation reversals, survivorship, regression to the mean, multiple comparisons), and reporting uncertainty honestly. Use this to run an analysis, review one before acting on it, or work out why two people looking at the same data reached opposite conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tencent Survey (wj.qq.com) online survey platform skill. Supports survey creation, question management, answer collection, and data export. Use when user mentions surveys, questionnaires, forms, polls, exams, or assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Use when user says "give me research ideas on X", "brainstorm questions about Y", "what could I study with this data?", "I'm looking for a paper idea on...", "generate hypotheses for...". One-shot generation, not multi-turn. For idea-refinement use `/interview-me`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation. Use when user says "devil's advocate", "poke holes in this deck", "push back on my slides", "stress-test the design", "what would a skeptical student ask?". Read-only; surfaces questions to force rethinking. Lighter than `/pedagogy-review`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screenplay format, page craft, the writing process and adaptation (剧本格式/写作流程/改编) — merged from Wendy Henson (spec format rules), Richard Walter (page craft, revision), Neill Hicks (selling vs shooting script, draft chain), Syd Field (master shot, card method, adaptation as original work), Robert McKee (step outline → treatment → screenplay), Julian Hoxter (format elements, adaptation four questions), Diamond & Weissman (one-page nine-step) and Eric Bork — plus an exact typographic grid, element conventions (V.O./O.S., MORE/CONT'D, dual dialogue), a machine-writable output contract (Fountain, with forced markers for Chinese), and Asian industry formats (Chinese 场号制 影视剧本格式, Japanese 柱・ト書き・セリフ / 決定稿). Use when formatting a spec script, choosing the output file format, deciding what goes in action lines, planning drafts and outlines, cutting pages, adapting a novel, play or true story, writing a Chinese TV/film or Japanese-style script page, or preparing a submission-ready draft.

dontbesilent 商业模式诊断。两种模式：问诊（消解你的问题）和体检（拆解你的商业模式）。 触发方式：/dbs-diagnosis、/问诊、「帮我看看商业模式」「诊断一下我的业务」「我有个商业问题」 Business model diagnosis using dontbesilent's ontological framework. Two modes: consultation (dissolve your question) and checkup (analyze your business model). Trigger: /dbs-diagnosis, "diagnose my business model", "I have a business question"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a meta-agent request is too ambiguous to safely generate, package, publish, or adapt without one to five targeted questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a contract you're about to sign in plain language — surface the clauses that could bite you, what they mean, and what to question or renegotiate. Use when asked to check this contract before I sign, what am I agreeing to, are there red flags in this agreement, or explain this contract's risky bits. Produces a plain-English flag list of the risky/unusual clauses (auto-renewal, lock-in, liability, IP, termination, fees), what each means for you, questions to ask, and suggested changes — flagging when it's important enough for a lawyer. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 帮我准备大厂技术面试, 八股文怎么背, 模拟一面二面, 系统设计面试题, 项目深挖怎么答, 手撕算法, or run a mock technical interview for a Chinese internet company. Produces a preparation plan for the interview rounds Chinese tech companies run (笔试, 技术一面二面, 交叉面, HR 面), a 八股 question bank by stack with answer points, a system design walkthrough, a project deep-dive script, and a mock round asked one question at a time with follow-ups (追问) and scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a promotion defence (晋升答辩) for a level-based promotion process common at Chinese technology companies: the materials, the presentation structure, the evidence for the next level, and a rehearsal of the committee's questions. Use when asked 帮我准备晋升答辩, 晋升述职, 晋升 PPT, how do I prepare for my promotion committee, or 答辩问题. Produces a level-gap analysis against the target level's criteria, the defence presentation outline in Chinese, a timed talk track, and a question bank with answer points, then a mock committee round.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。