「read-only」の検索結果

Read the user's local TradingView desktop app through opencli: quotes, options chains with greeks and per-strike IV, options expiries, screener results across stocks, crypto, forex, futures, and bonds, gainers and losers, news headlines and full stories, alerts (active, fired, offline fires), watchlists including colored flag lists, symbol search, chart state, and chart screenshots. Use this skill whenever the user asks for any of these from TradingView ("TV") — for example an options chain, puts, or IV skew for a ticker, an oversold-stock screen, their red flag list, which alerts fired, or a screenshot of their chart. For plain quotes, TA readouts, scans, or futures without the desktop app, prefer tradingview-mcp. Read-only: it never places trades or edits watchlists, alerts, or layouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query Fintel (fintel.io) institutional market data through its REST API or official MCP server. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Fintel or asks about short interest, short interest ratio or days to cover, short squeeze data, borrow rate or cost to borrow, shares available to borrow, daily short volume, fails-to-deliver (FTD), 13F institutional owners ("who owns X"), insider buying or selling from SEC Form 3/4/5, analyst price targets, ratings and forecasts, dividend or earnings history and calendars, EOD or last prices, security lookup by ticker, CUSIP, ISIN, or FIGI, Fintel leaderboards, or their Fintel watchlists and alerts. Read-only: GET endpoints only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Day-2 AKS GPU and KAITO incidents using profile-aware, read-only evidence. WHEN: 'Insufficient nvidia.com/gpu', GPU pod Pending, model-load OOM, DCGM/VRAM, KAITO Workspace not ready, or GPU autoscaling. DO NOT USE FOR: setup (airunway-aks-setup), non-GPU incidents (aks-troubleshooting), standalone VM quota (azure-quotas), or generic cost (cost-analysis or cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collects bounded packet captures from AKS nodes and Azure network configuration for wire-level evidence. WHEN: "capture packets on an AKS node", "take a pcap", "run tcpdump on AKS", "prove where packets drop". Use for explicit packet-capture intent after read-only diagnostics, not general AKS connectivity or ingress troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, deploy, operate, and troubleshoot Azure Local (formerly Azure Stack HCI): sizing and prerequisites, Arc registration, lifecycle updates, workloads (Azure Local VMs, AKS on Azure Local, images, disks, logical networks), SDN and network security, and failure triage — starting read-only and confirming before risky changes. WHEN: Azure Local, Azure Stack HCI, Arc resource bridge, custom location, Azure Local VM, Arc VM, AKS on Azure Local, AKS hybrid, SDN, Lifecycle Manager, Azure Local update, disconnected site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; its docs-aware mode covers this variant) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening with living documentation. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan, one question at a time, challenging it against your project's existing domain model and glossary (CONTEXT.md), sharpening fuzzy terms, stress-testing with concrete scenarios, cross-referencing code, and updating CONTEXT.md + ADRs inline as decisions crystallise. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-with-docs-codex", "grill me against the docs then have codex review", "stress-test this against our domain model then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes in a project with established terminology/ADRs and wants alignment, documentation, AND a cross-model sanity check. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-with-docs (MIT). NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute a staged deployment for an external Attio REST integration with secret injection, contract tests, read-only smoke evidence, canary writes, and rollback. Use when releasing Attio-backed services. Trigger with "deploy Attio integration", "Attio rollout", or "Attio release plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose and configure Attio REST authentication for a single workspace or multi-workspace OAuth app, including least-privilege scopes and a read-only verification. Use when connecting a service to Attio. Trigger with "Attio auth", "Attio API key", or "Attio OAuth setup".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a bounded CI contract gate for an Attio integration using fixtures, schema checks, and an optional read-only smoke request. Use when Attio changes need pull-request evidence without mutating CRM data. Trigger with "Attio CI", "test Attio integration", or "Attio pull request gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove one Adobe API connection with a current, read-only or synthetic operation and a content-safe receipt. Use during onboarding before any production workflow. Use when the task requires adobe minimal access proof. Trigger with "Adobe hello world", "test Adobe connection", or "verify Adobe entitlement".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify web frontend behavior through real GUI interactions, read-only page inspection, and screenshots. Use for frontend acceptance tests, bug reproduction, interaction feedback, and visual checks with the browser tools available in the session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-validate CLI flags, docs, tests, and targets for consistency across the codebase. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: audit the codebase, check for consistency issues, find undocumented flags, verify test coverage, validate targets.yaml, check handler split conventions, or verify oplog instrumentation. This is a read-only audit — it reports issues but never modifies files. Use after large refactors, before releases, or whenever you suspect docs/code/tests have drifted out of sync.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only access to local WeChat chats through rion-wechat-cli, plus a guided first-access workflow when the user asks to connect their own account or obtain its local database keys. Use for chat search, contact history and unsent reply drafts; acquisition requires separate confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Linux security mechanism bypass playbook. Use when facing restricted bash/rbash, read-only or noexec filesystems, AppArmor, SELinux, seccomp filters, or audit logging that must be evaded during post-exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a local or remote tabular file (CSV/TSV) for common data quality issues — schema, nulls, types, duplicates. Read-only. Use when a dataset needs a quality check before publishing, or a showcase renders wrong (blank cells, garbled numbers, an unsortable date column) and the cause needs isolating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit external compatibility between two DSH (DeepSeek Harness) versions and detect reverts, producing an upgrade-report directory; compares git tags with a source checkout, or published npm packages without one. Use whenever the user asks to check/compare/audit two DSH versions or whether upgrading is safe — e.g. "more changes or reverts in dsh-vX -> dsh-vY", "compare the breaking changes" — even with only two version numbers and no source location. Read-only outside the report directory; npm mode installs in isolation with --ignore-scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore an existing PostgreSQL database before answering questions about its data or writing SQL. Use this skill whenever a user asks for a query or a data-backed answer against an unfamiliar schema (counts, missing or failed records, recent changes), asks where a business concept lives, or asks how tables, joins, views, routines, triggers, RLS, or extensions work. Find the relevant objects with read-only pg_catalog queries, then request approval before inspecting data-derived statistics or rows. Not a schema-design or migration guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage Slack issue reports with one thread-only verdict, evidence review, cause-aware routing, tracker dedupe, and fail-closed ticket creation. Use only from the configured Benny triage automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial 5-7 question challenge to a deck's pedagogical choices — ordering, prerequisites, cognitive load, motivation. Use when user says "devil's advocate", "poke holes in this deck", "push back on my slides", "stress-test the design", "what would a skeptical student ask?". Read-only; surfaces questions to force rethinking. Lighter than `/pedagogy-review`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of `.tex`, `.qmd`, or `.md` text for AI-voice tells — boilerplate transitions ("Moreover", "Furthermore", "It is important to note that"), AI-cliché lexicon ("delve", "navigate the complexities", "tapestry", "robust framework"), em-dash overuse, symmetric paragraph shapes, tricolon abuse, hedging stacking, "not only X but also Y" frames, and formulaic openers. Produces a report; does NOT rewrite. Use when user says "humanize", "does this sound like AI?", "check for AI tells", "de-AI this draft", "remove AI voice", "audit my prose for sycophancy", or before journal submission / posting a working paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。