「reasoning」の検索結果

Researches a topic by breaking it into subtopics, gathering factual information with reasoning, and producing a structured summary with key findings and open questions. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, look up, summarize a topic, or says 'what is known about...' or 'learn about...'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides general use of AWS messaging and streaming services. Covers Amazon SQS, Amazon SNS, Amazon EventBridge, Amazon MQ, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams, Amazon Data Firehose, Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink, and Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (MSK). Use when reasoning about messaging and streaming patterns. Also identifies which AWS service owns each customer communication channel: email (Amazon SES), and WhatsApp, SMS, MMS, RCS, voice and mobile push (the AWS End User Messaging family of services). Routes the request to the specialized skill for that channel. Defers to the channel's specialized skill when the user already named a specific channel. In general, use specific skills or documentation searches for detailed service-specific questions. Do NOT use for MSK or Managed Service for Apache Flink questions, prefer specific skills. Does not configure customer communication channels; defers to specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous, defensible email-spoofability verdict and SPF supply-chain risk analysis computed from published DNS alone. Deepens the record-level SPF/DMARC/DKIM/BIMI/MTA-STS/DNSSEC fetch recipes in the offensive-osint arsenal (§16.14) with the reasoning that section doesn't do: a priority-ordered composite verdict for whether an attacker can actually land header-From-spoofed mail in an inbox, and by which vector (exact-domain vs subdomain) — grounded in the single most-misunderstood distinction in email security: the envelope MAIL FROM that SPF authenticates vs the visible header From: that only DMARC governs. Explains precisely why SPF -all/~all alone is NOT spoof-proof without DMARC enforcement, and why SPF +all bypasses DMARC even under p=reject pct=100. Covers RFC 7208 §4.6.4's 10-DNS-lookup / 2-void-lookup PermError fail-open condition with a runnable stdlib-only lookup-counter script, plus the SPF-include-takeover supply-chain vector (an attacker re-registering a dead include inherits SPF-pass authority over the victim domain) with strict transient-vs-NXDOMAIN discrimination discipline so a temporary SERVFAIL is never mistaken for a takeover lead. Fully passive: DNS TXT reads only, no mail sent, no RCPT TO probe, no API keys. Use when auditing a domain's real spoofing resistance (not just its published records), explaining to a client why 'we have SPF -all' does not mean they're covered, investigating an SPF PermError or an unusually long include chain, evaluating a dead SPF include as a takeover lead, or writing a defensible spoofability finding for a deliverable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Business logic vulnerability playbook. Use when reasoning about workflows, race conditions, price manipulation, coupon abuse, state machines, and multi-step authorization gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Geolocate or chronolocate a photo with tool-verified reasoning (where was this taken / when was it taken / photo geolocation / geo-guessing). Given one or more photos, intake.py does metadata, OCR and reverse image search (Baidu/Yandex) in one command; clues and candidates go on a candidate board (board.py) that ranks them and gives the next step; clues.py looks up calling codes, driving side, plates and area codes from region packs; for satellite and street view the machine ranks first and you look only at the top few (CLIP in sat_scan.py, DINOv2+SIFT in match.py); plus sun and shadow math, OSM Overpass and DEM skylines. Every conclusion is checked against real data; output is coordinates + error radius, evidence images and tiered confidence. Use when the user shares a photo and asks where was this taken / geolocate this / when was this taken / 这是哪 / 在哪拍的 / 帮我定位这张照片 / 网络迷踪 / 图寻 / 几点拍的.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating a decision through Charlie Munger-style mental models: inversion, incentives, quality filters, multidisciplinary reasoning, and concentrated judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches how to reason from a transaction protocol’s rules to a working model. Use when analyzing a concurrency-control paper, spec, or algorithm to identify state, metadata, invariants, operation rules, examples, counterexamples, guarantees, false aborts, unsafe commits, or tradeoffs before inspecting concrete traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides database transaction concurrency-control background. Use when reasoning about transactions, commits and aborts, serializability, isolation anomalies, conflicts, dependencies, and protocol families such as locking, timestamp ordering, OCC, MVCC, SSI, TicToc, hybrid protocols.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Induce visual patterns from examples — few-shot visual reasoning, grid-based pattern recognition, and ARC-style inductive inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LangChain ReAct agent implementation with tool binding for reasoning and action loops

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chain-of-thought and step-by-step reasoning prompts for complex problem solving

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SONA self-optimizing neural architecture with ReasoningBank trajectory learning, EWC++ anti-forgetting, and reinforcement learning feedback loops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure which models pstack uses per role and at what reasoning budget. Detects your available models and writes an always-applied rule that overrides the skill defaults. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", "pstack budget", or changing pstack's model choices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch an intelligent sub-agent with automatic model selection based on task complexity, specialized agent matching, Zero-shot CoT reasoning, and mandatory self-critique verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reset the FPF reasoning cycle to start fresh

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert prompt engineer specializing in crafting effective prompts for LLMs through advanced techniques including constitutional AI, chain-of-thought reasoning, and model-specific optimizati

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Privacy planning reference for data-flow reasoning, standards mapping, and DPIA thresholds

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 等保怎么做, 等保 2.0 定级, 等保备案和测评流程, 等保三级要求, 我们的系统需要过等保吗, or prepare an information system for China's Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS 2.0, 网络安全等级保护). Produces a grading recommendation (定级) with the reasoning for the expert review, the filing (备案) and assessment (测评) steps and their usual timing, a gap checklist across the ten control areas of GB/T 22239-2019, and a remediation plan, marked as preparation for a licensed assessor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help a student and family plan university applications after the 高考 (gaokao): use the student's provincial rank rather than raw score, build a 冲 / 稳 / 保 (reach, match, safe) list from official historical admission data, check subject requirements under the new gaokao, and weigh major against university. Use when asked 帮我填高考志愿, 志愿怎么填, 冲稳保怎么排, 这个分数能上什么学校, or plan gaokao applications. Produces a structured application list with the reasoning for each choice, a risk check of the whole list, and the questions to settle as a family. Never guarantees admission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the chart the data and the point actually need — the question-to-chart mapping (comparison, trend, composition, distribution, relationship), the honesty rules (axes, baselines, dual-axis traps), and the one-chart-one-point discipline. Use when asked what chart should I use, make this data visual, why does this chart feel misleading, or fix this graph for the deck. Produces the chart verdict with its reasoning, the honesty checklist applied, and the labeling that lets the chart travel without its author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。