「refactor」の検索結果

Audit and enforce the core/client boundary in multi-client projects. Detects where shared platform code is tangled with client-specific code, finds hardcoded client checks, config files that replace instead of merge, scattered client code, migration conflicts, and missing extension points. Produces a boundary map, violation report, and refactoring plan. Optionally generates FORK.md documentation and restructuring scripts. Triggers: 'fork discipline', 'check the boundary', 'is this core or client', 'platform audit', 'client separation', 'fork test', 'refactor for multi-client', 'clean up the fork'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-ready frontend components with accessible markup, sensible props, defined states, and tested behavior. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build a component from scratch, refactor an existing one, design a component API, or implement a UI element with proper states and accessibility. Triggers on build a component, create a button, create a modal, create a form input, component API, props design, component states, refactor component, accessible component. Also triggers when implementing UI from a design that needs to be reusable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide red-green-refactor TDD with test generation, coverage-gap analysis, and multi- framework support. Use when writing tests first, analyzing coverage, generating test stubs, or converting tests between Jest, Pytest, JUnit, and Vitest.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates tests that capture current behavior of existing code before refactoring. Use when you need a safety net before AI-assisted refactoring or modifying legacy code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform bulk code refactoring operations like renaming variables/functions across files, replacing patterns, and updating API calls. Use when users request renaming identifiers, replacing deprecated code patterns, updating method calls, or making consistent changes across multiple locations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detailed refactoring mechanics with step-by-step procedures, and test code smell catalog with detection patterns and before/after examples

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DDD-guided legacy refactoring patterns -- strangler fig, bubble context, ACL migration, 14 tactical/strategic/infrastructure patterns, and incremental monolith-to-microservices methodology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clean-code engineering standards for writing, refactoring, and reviewing code in any programming language. Use this whenever the user asks to write clean code, follow clean-code principles, refactor for clarity, improve naming, reduce complexity or duplication, separate concerns, tighten error handling, work test-first or do TDD, or otherwise raise code quality, readability, and maintainability. Also use when writing or reviewing Operately APIs or Ecto queries. Apply these rules by default when producing or changing code for a quality-conscious user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used only when the user explicitly asks to use `$ralph-specum-refactor`, or explicitly asks Ralph Specum in Codex to revise spec artifacts after implementation learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring workflow - analyze → plan → implement → review → validate

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal template for creating or refactoring a skill into the repository's reference-first shape. **Trigger**: reference-first template, blueprint skill, create a reusable skill, refactor a script-heavy skill. **Use when**: you need a lean `SKILL.md`, explicit `references/`, machine-readable `assets/`, and a minimal deterministic `run.py`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a complex or risky code change should be split into Kent Beck's two-step method by first making the change easy through behavior-preserving preparatory refactoring, then making the intended behavior change once the design supports it. This should trigger for requests such as Apply two-step change; Make this risky change safer; Refactor before changing behavior; Separate preparation from behavior change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java design, refactoring, or implementation tradeoffs should be evaluated with Kent Beck's simple design rules, including passes the tests, reveals intention, has no duplication, and has the fewest elements. This should trigger for requests such as Apply simple design rules; Review this design with Beck's rules; Choose between these refactoring options; Keep this Java design simple. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Java implementation work should be guided by Test-Driven Development, including maintaining a test list, choosing the next behavior, writing a failing test first, implementing only enough production code to pass, and refactoring while keeping tests green. This should trigger for requests such as Apply TDD; Use test-driven development; Drive this Java change with tests; Write the failing test first; Red-green-refactor this feature. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, improving, or refactoring Java object-oriented design, including applying SOLID, DRY, or YAGNI; improving classes and interfaces; correcting encapsulation, inheritance, or polymorphism; resolving God Class, Feature Envy, or Data Clumps; and improving object creation, methods, or exception contracts. Triggers include review Java OOD, refactor Java OOD, improve Java OOD, fix OOP misuse, and identify Java code smells. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Generics; Apply Generics; Refactor the code with Generics; Improve generic type safety in Java APIs; Fix raw types and unchecked casts in Java code. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for modern Java development; Apply best practices for modern Java development in Java code; Modernize Java code with records pattern matching or switch expressions; Replace legacy idioms with modern Java features; Adopt Java 8+ language features safely. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to apply functional programming principles in Java — including writing immutable objects and Records, pure functions, functional interfaces, lambda expressions, Stream API pipelines, Optional for null safety, function composition, higher-order functions, pattern matching for instanceof and switch, sealed classes/interfaces for controlled hierarchies, Stream Gatherers for custom operations, currying/partial application, effect boundary separation, and concurrent-safe functional patterns. This should trigger for requests such as Improve the code with Functional Programming; Apply Functional Programming; Refactor the code with Functional Programming; Refactor Java code to use streams or Optionals safely; Improve immutability and pure functions in Java. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code for high performance — including memory/allocation reduction, CPU hot-path optimization, and syntax/API/control-flow improvements. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for high performance; Optimize Java hot path; Reduce Java allocations; Improve Java latency/throughput. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when working with CSS, creating components, styling elements, refactoring styles, or reviewing CSS code. Triggers on "CSS", "styles", "Tailwind", "dark mode", "component styling", "semantic class", "@apply", "stylesheet". Routes to specialized sub-skills for creation, validation, or refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, edit, and refactor code with full tool access - Use when you need to actually write or modify code, create files, run commands, or implement features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for substantive feature, bug-fix, and behavior-changing work. Use automatically when implementing features, fixing bugs, or changing behavior (red → green → refactor). Also use when the user mentions TDD, /tdd, /TDD, or red-green-refactor. Do not use for documentation-only, formatting-only, exact generated-mirror, or provenance-only changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。