「report」の検索結果

Thesis report synthesis — turn a thesis's markdown artifacts into its letter-size thesis-report.html, then OPTIMIZE it against real page renders. Four-step loop — pack (deterministic Python bundle of all sources + report/metrics.json), author (the LLM writes report/content.html — narrative, KPI tiles, badges, timeline, tables and citations are LLM judgment), assemble (deterministic validation, template injection, Q50 pins, Q47 overflow gate), render + optimize (Chrome headless per-page PNGs — the LLM reads them and iterates until every page is visually clean). Spec 046 Q46–Q50.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates standardized quality control reports by aggregating metrics from FastQC, alignment, and other tools using MultiQC. Use when summarizing QC metrics across samples, creating shareable quality reports, or building automated QC pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional PDF Property Report Generator — compiles all PROPERTY-*.md analysis files into a polished, client-ready PDF with score gauges, comparison tables, financial projections, and investment recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report triage, validation, and severity escalation. Use when the user provides a bug bounty report to validate, wants to check if a finding is submittable, needs to escalate severity for maximum payout, or says 'triage this', 'validate this report', 'escalate this', 'is this submittable', 'check this bounty report', 'max bounty', or 'will this get accepted'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your team has high autonomy — and standups are vague, weekly meetings drift into status reports, and 1:1s produce nothing but "I'm fine." This playbook fixes all three layers at once. What's inside: • Daily Standup system — 3-field format, good sample, 4 COO principles to keep it honest • Weekly Meeting — strict 25-min agenda, Scrum Master rotation, 0–10 pulse check • 1:1 Framework — 9-dimension quantified pulse, 5-group deep question bank, bilateral feedback structure • Diagnostic layer — "stuck-at" detection: info / authority / collaboration / capability / direction • FAQ for 4 common failure modes (dead standups, status-report meetings, "I'm fine" 1:1s, scaling beyond 10 people) 🇨🇳 你的团队自由度很高——但 standup 越来越糊，例会变成汇报，1:1 问不出真话。这套三层 Motivation 操作手册解决的正是这件事：standup 是信息层，例会是对齐层，1:1 是个人层。三件事做好了，motivation 不是管出来的，是长出来的。 🇯🇵 チームの自律性は高いのに、スタンドアップは曖昧で、週次ミーティングは進捗報告になり、1on1では「大丈夫です」しか返ってこない——このプレイブックは、その3層すべてを同時に解決します。 🇰🇷 팀의 자율성은 높은데 스탠드업은 두루뭉술하고, 주간 회의는 진척 보고가 되어버리고, 1:1에서는 진심을 들을 수 없다면 — 이 플레이북이 세 레이어 모두를 동시에 해결합니다. Triggers: "团队 motivation" | "standup 没人写" | "例会变成汇报" | "1:1 问不出真话" | "高自由度团队管理" | "COO 如何管人" | "team motivation" | "standup best practices" | "1on1 framework" | "weekly meeting template" | "チームモチベーション" | "팀 동기부여" | "AI startup team ops" | "remote team alignment" | "engagement下降"

Generate financial reports — monthly close package, variance analysis, and management reporting. Use when asked to "generate monthly financials", "close the books", or "write variance commentary".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end research workflow skill for investment analysts and policy researchers. Three scope modes the user picks at trigger time — light (4-5 page decision memo, ~15 min, 0 charts), medium (12-15 page topic brief, ~1 h, 6-10 charts), heavy (flagship report 30-40 pages / 15k+ words, ~2-3 h, 25-35+ charts, multi-stage workflow, multi-LLM, PDF + Word + WeChat + HTML derivations). Reports default to English; the AI replies in the user's chat language. Battle-tested on real macro/policy/equity reports (e.g. Saudi Vision 2030 deep-dive). Triggers when user types /analyst-research, /flagship-research, or describes needs like "research report", "topic analysis", "investment research", "做研报", "投研报告", "主题分析", "深度分析", "policy assessment", "industry deep-dive". Not for: pure news commentary (use topic-brief), slide decks (use deckster-slide-generator), one-shot Q&A.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and display the final message from a Claude agent JSONL file. Use when the user wants to see an agent report, view agent output, extract agent results, check what an agent produced, or read the final response from a subagent. Triggers on requests like "show me agent report", "what did agent X produce", "extract agent output", "view agent results", or "get the report from agent ad42ecb".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a white-labeled, client-facing intelligence dashboard — a live, branded reporting surface an agency stands up per client instead of sending static reports. Covers brand auto-extraction from the client's URL, a three-tier build (Basic/Standard/Advanced), an onboarding feature wizard, a 10-page inventory, public-access tradeoffs, and the retention plays that make the dashboard sticky. Use when "client dashboard", "client intelligence dashboard", "white label dashboard", "client portal", "branded dashboard for my client", "agency dashboard", "build my client a dashboard", "give the client a live view instead of a report", or any request to stand up a durable, client-facing reporting surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates Odoo QWeb HTML and PDF reports between major versions while preserving data semantics, access behavior, paper geometry, and intended visual appearance. Use when porting reports across Odoo versions, adapting report templates or assets after an upgrade, or diagnosing visual regressions in migrated PDFs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a beautiful single-file HTML report from the project's docs/ folder. Works after any CRISP phase, after Archaeology, or at sprint close in Execute. Triggers on "generate report", "export docs", "create HTML report", "share docs", or automatically at sprint close in CRISP Execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures co-investment reporting with deal-level performance, fee/carry calculations, and co-invest program aggregate analysis. Use when reporting co-invest performance, tracking deal-level returns, or preparing co-invest summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Constructs fund-level performance reporting with IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI, PME, and vintage year benchmarking. Use when building fund reports, calculating performance metrics, or preparing LP reporting packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a project status report by reading existing artifacts (charter, backlog, sprint plan, WBS), calculating metrics, identifying blockers, and summarizing progress with RAG indicators for schedule, scope, budget, and quality. Use at the end of a sprint or reporting period, when stakeholders request a health update, before steering committee or governance meetings, or when a new blocker or risk materializes mid-project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Quarto document for reproducible reports, presentations, or websites. Covers YAML configuration, code chunk options, output formats, cross-references, and rendering. Use when creating a reproducible analysis report, building a presentation with embedded code, generating HTML, PDF, or Word documents from code, or migrating an existing R Markdown document to Quarto.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the FDA's public openFDA APIs for post-market drug data — FAERS adverse-event reports, Drugs@FDA approval and submission history, Structured Product Labels including boxed warnings, the National Drug Code directory, recall enforcement reports, and drug shortages. Use this skill to check what a regulator has already concluded about a molecule or its class, to date an approval and count its efficacy supplements, to read an approved indication or boxed warning, and to score a drug-event pair for disproportionate reporting with PRR, ROR, and chi-squared. Also trigger on openFDA, api.fda.gov, FAERS, Drugs@FDA, SPL, NDC, pharmacovigilance, boxed warning, adverse event report, drug recall, or safety signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a detailed Buy/Sell/Hold equity research report for Indian stock market (NSE/BSE listed companies). Use this skill whenever the user asks for a stock analysis, equity research, investment recommendation, target price, fundamental analysis, technical analysis, or buy/sell/hold opinion on any Indian company or stock. Triggers on phrases like "analyse [stock]", "should I buy [stock]", "research report for [company]", "target price for [stock]", "is [stock] a good buy", "NSE/BSE stock analysis", etc. Always use this skill for any Indian equity research request — even if the user just names a stock ticker or company and asks "what do you think?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or operate a business operations workspace for activity reports, tasks, and customer routing; workIQ is optional. Use when initializing BizOps, processing ongoing business updates, reviewing reports or tasks, or preparing an operations handoff. Triggers: business-operations-workspace, BizOps, 業務管理ワークスペース, レポート管理, タスク管理, 業務引き継ぎ.

Structures a clear, actionable malware analysis report covering summary, sample identity, capabilities, IOCs, ATT&CK mapping, and detection guidance for both technical and decision-making audiences. Activates for requests to write, structure, or review a malware analysis or reverse-engineering report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operationalizes a threat intelligence report into hunts: extracting IOCs and TTPs, mapping behaviors to ATT&CK and available telemetry, prioritizing durable behavioral indicators over volatile atomic ones, and producing concrete hunt queries. Activates for requests to hunt from a threat report, operationalize CTI, or turn an intel report into detections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。