1,467 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Routes an accounting or audit request to the right module skill, from software selection through monthly closing, asking only what is missing. Use for books of accounts or audit files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scores shortlisted accounting packages against 57 evidence-backed fields, emitted as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for choosing accounting software.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegation mode for open-code-review (OCR). Instead of OCR calling an LLM endpoint, this skill instructs the host agent to perform the code review itself, using OCR only for deterministic engineering: file selection and rule resolution. Use when the host agent should drive the review with its own LLM capabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for JWT, JWS, and JWE validation paths, header parsing, key selection, claim acceptance, audience and issuer checks, role derivation, and token-to-identity confusion bugs. Use when the user asks to inspect JWT headers or claims, key lookup, `kid` handling, `alg` confusion, audience or issuer validation, role claims, or explain how a token becomes accepted identity or privilege. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for forced-auth coercion, relay chains, target selection, NTLM or related acceptance paths, and coercion-to-privilege transitions. Use when the user asks to trace a coercion primitive, follow a relay path, analyze forced authentication, determine which service accepts relayed auth, or connect a coercion step to resulting privilege, enrollment, or code execution. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines using the six-stage Source→Hydrator→Filter→Scorer→Selector→SideEffect framework popularized by xAI's open-sourced X For You algorithm. Use when building any system that picks "the top K items for a (user, context)" — content feeds, search ranking, RAG rerankers, task prioritizers, notification triage, ad selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide whether to fine-tune at all, and route to the right method (SFT, DPO/ORPO/KTO, GRPO/RLVR, continued pretraining) and base model. Use when starting any fine-tuning effort, when unsure whether RAG or prompting would suffice, or when choosing between preference-optimization and reinforcement methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics, preset configurations, and agent type selection. Use this skill when deciding how many agents to spawn for a task, when choosing between a review team versus a feature team versus a debug team, when selecting the correct subagent_type for each role to ensure agents have the tools they need, when configuring display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) for a CI or local environment, or when building a custom team composition for a non-standard workflow such as a migration or security audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured messaging protocols for agent team communication including message type selection, plan approval, shutdown procedures, and anti-patterns to avoid. Use this skill when establishing communication norms for a newly spawned team, when deciding whether to send a direct message or a broadcast, when a team-lead needs to review and approve an implementer's plan before work begins, when orchestrating a graceful team shutdown after all tasks are complete, or when debugging why teammates are not coordinating correctly at integration points.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design effective KPI dashboards with metrics selection, visualization best practices, and real-time monitoring patterns. Use this skill when building an executive SaaS metrics dashboard tracking MRR, churn, and LTV/CAC ratios; designing an operations center with live service health and request throughput; creating a cohort retention analysis view for a product team; or debugging a dashboard where metrics contradict each other due to inconsistent calculation methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user needs to transform business requirements, use case descriptions, or meeting transcripts into a technical Power Platform solution architecture, including component selection and Mermaid.js diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Power BI report visualization design prompt for creating effective, user-friendly, and accessible reports with optimal chart selection and layout design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install and configure Markstream streaming Markdown renderers for Vue, React, Svelte, Angular, Nuxt, and Vue 2 applications. Use for package selection, minimal peer dependencies, CSS order, SSR boundaries, streaming mode, and renderer setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Credit risk data cleaning and variable screening pipeline for pre-loan modeling. Use when working with raw credit data that needs quality assessment, missing value analysis, or variable selection before modeling. it covers data loading and formatting, abnormal period filtering, missing rate calculation, high-missing variable removal,low-IV variable filtering, high-PSI variable removal, Null Importance denoising, high-correlation variable removal, and cleaning report generation. Applicable scenarios arecredit risk data cleaning, variable screening, pre-loan modeling preprocessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bug fixer, architect, PR reviewer, vibecoder, security reviewer, and more), all CodeTour step types (file/line, selection, pattern, uri, commands, view), and tour-level fields (ref, isPrimary, nextTour). Works with any repository in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous evolutionary code improvement engine with tournament selection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for writing SGLang CI/UT tests. Covers CustomTestCase, CI registration, server fixtures, model selection, mock testing, and test placement. Always read test/README.md for the full CI layout, how to run tests, and extra tips. Use when creating new tests, adding CI test cases, writing unit tests, or when the user asks to add tests for SGLang features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance attribution analysis — Brinson sector/stock-selection attribution, factor alpha/beta decomposition, market-timing evaluation, and benchmark comparison framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fundamental factor screening — filter stocks by PE/PB/ROE, financial statement fields, and other metrics for value or growth selection. Supports A-shares (via tushare extra_fields or fundamental_fields) and HK/US stocks (via yfinance Ticker info).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploys and operates Falco with the modern eBPF driver in Kubernetes and Docker, covering driver selection, Helm installation, output channels, and the built-in ruleset that detects container escape, namespace abuse, privileged mounts, and anomalous syscalls. Use when standing Falco up on a cluster, choosing between the eBPF and kernel-module drivers, routing Falco alerts into a SIEM or Falcosidekick, or upgrading an existing deployment. Keywords: Falco, modern_ebpf, kernel module, Helm, Falcosidekick, runtime security, syscall. Do not use for authoring individual escape rules - use detecting-container-escape-with-falco-rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures secure OAuth 2.0 authorization flows, including Authorization Code with PKCE, Client Credentials, and Device Authorization Grant, covering flow selection, PKCE implementation, token lifecycle management, and scope design per OAuth 2.1. Use when implementing or hardening OAuth 2.0 authentication/authorization for web, mobile, SPA, or machine-to-machine clients.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) on servers, covering cipher suite and key-exchange group selection, and validates the resulting configuration with openssl s_client and testssl.sh. Use when deploying or hardening TLS 1.3 for secure communications, or when testing a server for common TLS misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API design principles and decision-making. REST vs GraphQL vs tRPC selection, response formats, versioning, pagination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。