1.4万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for `/loopx-pr-review` or evidence-backed PR queue review. Run `loopx pr-review` first, execute the capability-owned review plan for each selected exact head, then publish full bilingual PR reviews (complete Chinese five-block review plus one concise English verdict) that match the verified findings. Use `loopx-pr-merge` for approval or merge actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Amazon product detail page scraper: extract full product data from any open Amazon product detail URL (any /dp/{asin} or /gp/product/{asin} page across all Amazon regional TLDs) — returns asin, url, title, brand, price, listPrice, stars, reviewsCount, starsBreakdown (5/4/3/2/1 star percentages), answeredQuestions, inStock, inStockText, delivery, fastestDelivery, returnPolicy, breadCrumbs, features (bullet points), description, bookDescription, thumbnailImage, highResolutionImages, galleryThumbnails, productOverview (Brand/Model/etc.), attributes (tech spec table), attributesMapped (flat key-value), bestsellerRanks (rank + category + url), variantAttributes (currently selected color/size/style), variantAsins, seller (name + id + url), isAmazonChoice, amazonChoiceText, monthlyPurchaseVolume, hasAPlusContent, hasBrandStory, aiReviewsSummary, reviewsLink, productPageReviews (sample), videosCount, locationText, loadedCountryCode. Works on amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.de, amazon.co.jp, amazon.fr, amazon.it, amazon.es, amazon.ca, amazon.com.au, amazon.in, amazon.com.mx, amazon.com.br, amazon.nl, amazon.se, amazon.sg, amazon.ae, amazon.sa, amazon.pl, amazon.tr, amazon.eg. Use when user mentions Amazon product page, Amazon /dp/, Amazon dp URL, Amazon ASIN scraper, Amazon product detail, Amazon PDP, Amazon product data, Amazon product info, Amazon product fields, Amazon product attributes, Amazon full field extraction, Amazon per-ASIN enrichment, Amazon rating breakdown, Amazon stars breakdown, Amazon bestseller rank, Amazon BSR, Amazon variants, Amazon variant ASINs, Amazon color size options, Amazon feature bullets, Amazon A+ content, Amazon brand story, Amazon AI review summary, Amazon bought in past month, Amazon monthly sales volume, Amazon Amazon's Choice badge, Amazon seller info, scrape Amazon product, enrich Amazon ASIN, Amazon ASIN details, Amazon product review data. Also applies to bulk ASIN enrichment from a list of URLs, competitive product research, brand catalog audits, price and stock monitoring per ASIN, and building a normalized product dataset from a list of Amazon URLs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code changes and provides actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review a PR, diff, commit, or code changes. Triggers on "/review", "review this PR", "review my changes", "code review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users create and manage mirrord preview environments — running a modified service as an isolated pod in a shared Kubernetes cluster, scoped by an environment key and HTTP/queue traffic filtering, so teams can validate and review changes against real traffic without affecting live services. Use when a developer wants to run "mirrord preview" ad hoc, share a preview via a link (mirrord-share-ingress), or wire preview environments into CI with the metalbear-co/mirrord-preview GitHub Action (e.g. per-PR previews, least-privilege cluster access).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-review-first audit for Chinese and English academic papers across LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats. Use whenever the user wants reviewer-style paper critique, pre-submission readiness checks, pass/fail gate decisions, structured revision roadmaps, or re-audits of revised manuscripts. Trigger even if the user only says "review my paper", "check if this is ready to submit", "audit this PDF", "simulate peer review", "find the biggest problems in this manuscript", or "re-check whether I fixed the review issues". Do not use for direct source editing or compilation-heavy repair; route those to the format-specific writing skills instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation. Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation. Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean. Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis, effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review, conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory, thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research, paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review of a PR, branch, or your own uncommitted work across eight dimensions — security, correctness, test coverage, API/compatibility, usability, documentation, code quality, performance. Sizes the diff, reviews inline or fans out reviewers off a shared brief, verifies findings against code, reports a grouped list with a shape verdict, fixes on approval. Use for "review this PR", "/pr-review 3011", or a pre-flight self-review before submitting; add "thorough" for adversarial verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review, regression review, security review, or wants high-signal issues plus a prioritized fix path without editing files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to process, triage, fetch, view, count, list, or resolve review feedback in a GitHub PR. Supports both CodeRabbit and Codex review workflows. In this workflow, “real review feedback” is strictly defined as actionable inline comments; for CodeRabbit, exclude review summaries and nitpicks, and for Codex, exclude review summary cards and use PR main-thread reactions only as status signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor dividend portfolios with Kanchi-style forced-review triggers (T1-T5) and convert anomalies into OK/WARN/REVIEW states without auto-selling. Use when users ask for 減配検知, 8-Kガバナンス監視, 配当安全性モニタリング, REVIEWキュー自動化, or periodic dividend risk checks.
When the user wants to analyze, respond to, or improve their app reviews and ratings. Also use when the user mentions "reviews", "ratings", "negative reviews", "how to get more reviews", "review response", or "my rating is dropping". For broader ASO audit, see aso-audit. For retention issues causing bad reviews, see retention-optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial dual-model code review that runs two AI models in parallel, cross-references findings, and produces a consensus severity table with fix confidence ratings. Use when asked for a thorough code review, adversarial review, dual-model review, confidence-rated review, or 'Hanselman review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate performance fairly when output is AI-assisted — what still measures the human, what now measures the tooling, and how to run the review conversation. Use when reviewing someone whose work is heavily AI-assisted, when output volume stopped meaning anything, when calibrating a team with uneven AI adoption, or when writing review criteria for the AI era. Produces review guidance: a what-measures-whom analysis, rewritten criteria, calibration rules for mixed-adoption teams, and conversation scripts. For the general review document use performance-review; for redesigning the role itself use role-redesign-for-ai.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and reviews SwiftUI views with modern MV architecture, state, composition, isolated previews, and migration guidance. Covers @Observable ownership, @State/@Bindable/@Environment wiring, view decomposition, ViewModifiers, environment values, .task loading, iOS 26+ handoffs, Writing Tools, clipboard availability, and performance. Use when structuring SwiftUI state, managing @Observable, composing views, previewing meaningful UI states, or correcting SwiftUI patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an independent code review using the OpenAI Codex CLI in headless mode. Gets a second opinion from a different model family (the current Codex models) on recent changes, a PR, a commit, or the whole app — covering bugs, regressions, security, data consistency, UX/state bugs, performance risks, and testing gaps. Saves a severity-prioritised report to .jez/reviews/. Triggers: 'codex review', 'review with codex', 'independent code review', 'what does codex think', 'get codex to review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA", "best AI to redline", "route this contract review", or is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review local code changes for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and pragmatic improvements. Use when the user asks to review the current changes from `git status`, or to review a specific backlog task by id such as `task-65` or `TASK-65`. Also trigger when the user says things like "review", "review current changes", "check my changes", "look over the diff", or "review task-42".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a leader must review or approve TEXT-based team output before it ships — content briefs checked for angle, pillar, and CTA, ad copy and creative checked for substantiated claims, on-brand tone, a hook inside the first 125 characters, and platform policy, ending in an Approve, Revise, or Redo verdict with point-by-point feedback. Trigger on 'review this brief', 'approve the ad copy', 'check ads before launch', 'review team output', 'is this good enough to publish', 'my team keeps sending me drafts'. Not for — reviewing a visual design, see `47-design-review-global`; evaluating a person over a period, see `65-team-performance-review-global`; writing the copy yourself, see `05-ad-copy-global`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using the rationale recalled from past Codex session history). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "address review feedback", "respond to PR comments", "answer review questions", or "address code review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。