「cis」の検索結果

Capture, validate, query, and sync architectural patterns and design decisions in the knowledge graph

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feature specification creation from codebase research. Produces requirements, acceptance criteria, architecture decisions, implementation plans, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process meeting recordings and transcripts into decisions, action items, and team dynamics

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms conversations and discussions into structured documentation pages in Notion. Captures insights, decisions, and knowledge from chat context, formats appropriately, and saves to wikis or databases with proper organization and linking for easy discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when building multi-cloud systems, avoiding vendor lock-in, or leveraging best-of-breed services from multiple providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert .NET backend architect specializing in C#, ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, Dapper, and enterprise application patterns. Masters async/await, dependency injection, caching strategies, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for .NET API development, code review, or architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restore saved project context, architectural decisions, and work state. Use when resuming interrupted work, retrieving prior context, or merging context across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and serialize project state, architectural decisions, and working context. Use when preserving knowledge for later sessions, handoffs, or searchable context retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restore saved project context, architectural decisions, and work state. Use when resuming interrupted work, retrieving prior context, or merging context across sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply writing rules to any documentation that humans will read. Makes your writing clearer, stronger, and more professional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tackling complex reasoning tasks requiring step-by-step logic, multi-step arithmetic, commonsense reasoning, symbolic manipulation, or problems where simple prompting fails - provides comprehensive guide to Chain-of-Thought and related prompting techniques (Zero-shot CoT, Self-Consistency, Tree of Thoughts, Least-to-Most, ReAct, PAL, Reflexion) with templates, decision matrices, and research-backed patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before writing any type of tests. Distills 14 industry sources into deterministic decision gates, schemas, and worked test examples.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage evidence freshness by identifying stale decisions and providing governance actions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute complete FPF cycle from hypothesis generation to decision

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge in the repo wiki. Use when the user wants to capture a team decision, convention, or architecture note, propose an addition or correction for team review, or invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Keywords: mex, project memory, CLAUDE.md, team memory, drift, inbox. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge. Use when the user asks to capture a discussion or decision in project knowledge, propose an addition or correction for team review, or explicitly invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dialogue writing and revision for screen and stage (对白/台词/潜台词) — merged from Robert McKee's Dialogue (dialogue as action, said/unsaid/unsayable, exposition as ammunition, beat = action/reaction gerunds, flaws of credibility/language/content/design, character-specific vocabulary and grammar, seven scene analyses), Richard Walter (economy, subtext, argument, no small talk, no parentheticals, silence), Neill Hicks (listening, on-the-nose exceptions, energy, five-step exercise), Lu Jun (语言要美; 典雅美/通俗美, 对话三要求 动作性/性格化/潜台词), Lajos Egri (dialogue born of three-dimensional character, escalation), Blake Snyder (cover-the-names test), and screwball-comedy dialogue conventions. Use when writing or polishing dialogue, fixing on-the-nose or expository lines, giving each character a distinct voice, converting a two-hander into a trialogue, writing comedy exchanges, or cutting speeches. Chinese-opera lyrics (戏曲唱词) are in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang, not here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing plays and screenplays in the Chekhovian mode (契诃夫戏剧法) — distilled from the complete plays (没有父亲的人/普拉东诺夫, 伊凡诺夫, 林妖→万尼亚舅舅, 海鸥, 三姊妹, 樱桃园, nine one-acts) plus Chekhov's own letters, Stanislavsky's and Nemirovich-Danchenko's rehearsal notes and 焦菊隐/童道明 criticism. Covers the four-act mood-based structure without central climax, off-stage events, "correct answer stated in Act 1 and refused", the announced event that never happens, three-layer endings (hope monologue + nihilist line + household action), no-villain conflict with environment, every character's object and catchphrase, one-way love chains, half-step-off dialogue, philosophy cut by thirst, the shortest words for the deepest pain, stage-direction and sound discipline, and how Chekhov revised The Wood Demon into Uncle Vanya. Use when the user wants an ensemble drama, a "nothing happens" play, subtext-heavy dialogue, a family estate / provincial story, an anti-climactic structure, or asks how to "Chekhov-ize" a script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify a check before it is allowed to clear anything — prove it can detect the failure it is meant to catch. Seeds known defects into a copy of a real artifact plus a clean control, runs the checker, and reports recall and false-positive rate into a qualification ledger. Use when the user says "does this check work", "qualify the gate", "test my reviewer", "seed defects", "vaccinate", "qualify the checks", "can I trust this review", "does it pass for the right reason", or before relying on any automated check or referee simulation for a decision that matters. NOT a code fixer and NOT a reviewer itself — it grades the grader.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a structured state snapshot before stopping or handing off. Captures the active plan, recent decisions, file pointers (with line numbers), open questions, and the next 1–3 actions into a checkpoint file under `quality_reports/checkpoints/`. Optionally proposes `[LEARN]` entries to add to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "checkpoint", "save state", "snapshot before I stop", "where am I", "wrap up the session for handoff", or before a long break / model switch / collaborator handoff. Companion to (NOT replacement for) the narrative session-log workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-brief + claim-record discipline for delegated or AI-assisted research work. Use when starting any substantive research task or long autonomous run (write the brief first), and when reporting results that will support a claim in a paper or decision (produce the claim record). Keeps faster execution from being confused with credible evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。