「failure」の検索結果

Generate and run tests for Adobe App Builder actions and UI components. Scaffolds Jest unit tests, integration tests against deployed actions, contract tests for Adobe API interactions, and React component tests using Testing Library. Provides mock helpers for State, Files, Events SDKs, @adobe/aio-lib-* clients, ExC Shell context (@adobe/exc-app), and UIX Guest SDK (@adobe/uix-guest). Use this skill whenever the user mentions testing App Builder actions, writing unit tests for Runtime actions, creating integration tests, mocking Adobe SDKs, setting up test fixtures, running aio app test, or wants to verify action behavior before deployment. Also trigger when users mention Jest configuration for App Builder, test coverage, CI test setup, React component test, Testing Library, UI test, Provider wrapper, test my page, test my form, test my table, test my component, mock shell context, mock extension context, debug test failures, or fix Jest errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference for producing Adobe Document Authoring (DA, da.live) and Edge Delivery Services (EDS, aka aem.live/Helix) compatible content. Use whenever generating HTML for DA upload, uploading media binaries to DA, publishing to aem.live, or driving the DA admin API (auth, source PUT, preview/publish). Covers block HTML format (canonical div-class form and accepted table alternate), section structure, page/section metadata, icons, links, images, default content, document skeleton constraints, block cell content normalization, the DA Source API contract, IMS auth, media storage, supported formats, Media Bus vs Content Bus delivery, and silent-failure rules that corrupt content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR test analysis routing. Use for pull request or diff test impact, changed-test review, CI failure interpretation, and focused test matrix recommendations; do not use for general code review or editing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E2E artifact handling routing. Use when traces, videos, screenshots, reports, or failure bundles need controlled repository-local placement; do not use for simple unit tests or production-mutating E2E flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses LLM output failures including hallucinations, constraint violations, format errors, and reasoning issues. Provides root cause classification, prompt fixes, tool improvements, and new test cases. Use for "debugging AI", "fixing prompts", "quality issues", or "output errors".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates comprehensive GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows for linting, testing, building, and deploying. Includes caching strategies, matrix builds, artifact handling, and failure diagnostics. Use for "GitHub Actions", "CI pipeline", "workflow automation", or "continuous integration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes flaky tests by identifying root causes (timing issues, shared state, randomness, network dependencies) and provides stabilization strategies. Use for "flaky tests", "test stability", "intermittent failures", or "test debugging".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt JWT cryptographic failures — alg:none signature-stripping and RS256→HS256 key-confusion that let an attacker forge a token for any identity (e.g. an admin) without knowing a secret. Use when the app authenticates with a JSON Web Token (an `eyJ...` Bearer token in the Authorization header, a cookie, or a login response). This skill OWNS JWT signature/crypto forgery (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku header injection); hunt-ato covers JWT as one ATO path, hunt-auth-bypass covers SSO/SAML token trust, hunt-api-misconfig covers non-crypto JWT handling. Critical when a forged token grants access to another user's data or an admin-only endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt ASP.NET-specific surface — ViewState deserialization (signed-only vs encrypted), machineKey recovery, dual-parser MAC-bypass anti-pattern, request-validator bypass, trace.axd/elmah.axd disclosure, load-balanced ViewState cross-node failures, SafeControl enumeration via reflection, customErrors mode=Off stack-trace leaks, classic Webforms .aspx/.asmx/.svc surface. Built for ASP.NET Webforms + WCF + SharePoint farms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Fly.io flyctl CLI for deploying and operating apps on Fly.io: deploys (local or remote builder), viewing status/logs, SSH/console, secrets/config, scaling, machines, volumes, and Fly Postgres (create/attach/manage databases). Use when asked to deploy to Fly.io, debug fly deploy/build/runtime failures, set up GitHub Actions deploys/previews, or safely manage Fly apps and Postgres.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix common cron job failures in Clawdbot/Moltbot - message delivery issues, tool timeouts, timezone bugs, and model fallback problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build backend AI with Vercel AI SDK v6 stable. Covers Output API (replaces generateObject/streamObject), speech synthesis, transcription, embeddings, MCP tools with security guidance. Includes v4→v5 migration and 15 error solutions with workarounds. Use when: implementing AI SDK v5/v6, migrating versions, troubleshooting AI_APICallError, Workers startup issues, Output API errors, Gemini caching issues, Anthropic tool errors, MCP tools, or stream resumption failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

### 1. The Fault/Error/Failure Hierarchy NOT for unrelated tasks outside this domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugs recorded DAG lineage through historical inspection, deterministic decision replay when prerequisites hold, and clearly labeled counterfactual or live re-execution. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "inspect node state", "compare runs", or "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when applying Cloudflare D1 migrations, fighting Supabase migration history vs SQL execution, choosing direct psql over CLI, designing idempotent migrations, debugging schema drift between local and remote, or recovering after a half-applied migration. Triggers: supabase migration repair instructions appearing, table missing after "applied" status, "Tenant or user not found" when running psql, --remote vs --local D1 confusion, NOT NULL on a populated column, foreign key constraint failures, drift between staging and prod schemas. NOT for Mongo/document migrations, ORM-managed migrations specifically (Prisma/Drizzle have their own conventions), or pure data backfills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesizes evidence-linked feedback from validation results, confidence evidence, and iteration triggers. Proposes bounded revision guidance for a stated acceptance failure. Activate on 'synthesize feedback', 'improvement suggestions', 'actionable feedback', 'iteration guidance', 'feedback generation'. NOT for iteration detection (use dag-iteration-detector) or convergence tracking (use dag-convergence-monitor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose and safely admit immutable DAG revisions after failures, requirements, resource changes, or unresolved effects. NOT for mutating an executing graph in place or retrying an effect with unknown commit state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause", "performance profile", "aggregate results", "merge branches", "execution patterns", "optimize DAG". NOT for planning DAGs (use dag-planner), executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), or validating outputs (use dag-quality).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate idea generation sessions that actually produce diverse, useful options instead of degenerating into the first plausible answer. Use for product ideation, feature exploration, problem-reframing, naming, design alternatives, strategic option-generation, or any task where the failure mode is "we picked the obvious thing too fast." Covers solo and group sessions, divergence/convergence discipline, technique selection (SCAMPER, Crazy Eights, How Might We, 6-3-5 Brainwriting, Reverse Brainstorming, Worst Possible Idea, Random Stimulus), facilitation moves for handling dominant voices and groupthink, and structured convergence to a shortlist with rationale. Outputs a session artifact with options generated, evaluation, shortlist, and the rejected-but-interesting list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。