「fea」の検索結果

Designs a translational blueprint for moving a biomedical finding toward diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, or therapeutic development, with explicit translational milestones, validation thresholds, and feasibility-sensitive route framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete research plans that integrate clinical variables with multi-omics data from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a study that combines clinical variables with transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, or related omics layers for mechanism interpretation, biomarker development, risk stratification, treatment-response analysis, or translational use. It should define the clinical use case, alignment across data layers, feature-reduction and fusion logic, modeling route, mechanism-interpretation layer, validation ladder, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, platform coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete conventional non-oncology diagnostic machine-learning research designs from a user-provided disease context, optional mechanism theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on disease-vs-control transcriptome comparison, optional mechanism-gene restriction, feature shrinkage, diagnostic model construction, ROC / calibration / DCA evaluation, interpretation layers, and orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete process-related diagnostic biomarker bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, gene-family or pathway theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on process-related genes, DEG and WGCNA integration, machine-learning feature selection, nomogram-based diagnostic modeling, immune infiltration, regulatory-network analysis, and optional external or experimental validation. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, co-expression-module integration, machine-learning biomarker selection, diagnostic model/nomogram workflow, immune-regulatory interpretation and validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. It identifies where results are robust, fragile, overfit, under-validated, or overclaimed. Always separate reported findings from reliability judgment. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, study features, or validation claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies the real underlying study design used in a medical or biomedical paper, distinguishes primary and secondary design components when papers are hybrid, and converts the paper into an evidence-aware design label suitable for literature appraisal, evidence grading, and downstream review workflows. Always identify the actual design from what the study did, not from how the authors describe it. Never fabricate references, metadata, or study features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains why studies on the same biomedical topic reach different or opposing conclusions by auditing differences in population, endpoint definition, sample source, assay or platform, study design, statistical model, adjustment strategy, validation chain, and bias control. It separates true contradiction from apparent contradiction caused by framing or methods. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, dataset details, platform details, study features, or conflict explanations that are not supported by the input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to train a two-class random forest model from an expression-like feature matrix, rank variable importance, and generate reproducible error and importance plots. NOT for regression tasks, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, preprocessing, or remote data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running prognostic survival analysis on a clinical cohort with time-to-event data to estimate univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, export result tables, and generate forest plots. NOT for: nomogram construction, calibration curves, time-dependent ROC analysis, or model training/feature selection beyond the built-in univariate screening rule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when performing PCA principal component dimensionality reduction on tabular numeric data. Supports command-line parameter input, automatic numeric feature selection, parameter validation, result directory creation, and CSV or TXT format result export.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when constructing a prognosis nomogram from survival-related clinical predictors, exporting the nomogram bundle and C-index table, and optionally rendering the final nomogram PDF. NOT for: univariate/multivariable Cox feature screening, calibration curves, ROC analysis, decision-curve analysis, or non-survival outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs cell-based and animal-based validation plans that translate computational, omics, biomarker, genetic, or clinical findings into experimentally testable validation routes. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to move from an in silico, statistical, or clinical association finding toward wet-lab validation using cell systems, organoid-like systems, xenograft or genetically relevant animal models. It should define the exact claim to test, separate mechanism-testing from association-support and translational-support goals, choose the best-fit model family, specify perturbation strategy, readouts, controls, sequencing of experiments, and four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with one recommended primary plan. Never fabricate model availability, reagent availability, species relevance, assay feasibility, phenotype penetrance, expected effect sizes, validation success, or literature references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validating an existing prognostic risk signature on an external bulk expression cohort with survival outcomes, producing risk scores, Kaplan-Meier curves, risk distribution plots, heatmap, and time-dependent ROC curves. NOT for: model training, feature selection, nomogram construction, calibration analysis, or single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building a binary classification model from an expression matrix or other omics feature matrix with LASSO logistic regression, cross-validation, and coefficient path visualization. NOT for: multiclass classification, survival/Cox models, or ordinary linear regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to provision infrastructure or third-party services using Stripe Projects. Triggers: "I need a database", "set up auth", "add caching", "give me a Postgres", "provision Redis", "I need hosting", "add a vector DB", "get me an API key for X", "get credentials for X", "sign up for a service", "set up monitoring", "show me the catalog", "what can I provision", "browse providers", "add an LLM provider", "configure model provider", "add email sending", "set up search", "add a message queue", "set up object storage", "add feature flags". Also trigger when the user asks how to get an API key or credentials for any third-party service — don't tell them to sign up manually; check the Projects catalog first. Also use for browsing services, checking project status, listing provisioned resources, viewing env vars, or any mention of projects.dev or adding/provisioning/connecting a cloud service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show skill-bus overview, status, and available commands. Quick reference for all skill-bus features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing, resuming, reviewing, or verifying the DeepSeek++ Codex-style automation feature in this repository. Covers reading docs/progress/MASTER.md, following GitHub Issues

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic handbook-grounded retrieval and thermocouple computations for reflow profile compliance outputs such as ramp, TAL, peak, feasibility, and selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class data science skill for statistical modeling, experimentation, causal inference, and advanced analytics. Expertise in Python (NumPy, Pandas, Scikit-learn), R, SQL, statistical methods, A/B testing, time series, and business intelligence. Includes experiment design, feature engineering, model evaluation, and stakeholder communication. Use when designing experiments, building predictive models, performing causal analysis, or driving data-driven decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational workflow for hard integer-programming optimization tasks: selecting an installed solver, preserving solver/incumbent certificates, extracting feasible schedules, recomputing metrics from final outputs, and writing consistent reports. Use when a task requires a MIP, solver status, objective value, bound, gap, formulation write-up, or benchmark output files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze geospatial data using geopandas with proper coordinate projections. Use when calculating distances between geographic features, performing spatial filtering, or working with plate boundaries and earthquake data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for day-ahead or multi-period unit commitment problems, including thermal on/off schedules, dispatch, startup/shutdown logic, minimum up/down time, ramping, spinning reserve deliverability, renewable curtailment, operating-cost accounting, and independent feasibility checks for power-system operations schedules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for clause-by-clause review of a contract against a structured deviation policy ("playbook"). Covers how to walk a playbook, locate the matching provision in the contract, apply rule types (max-value, must-be-present, must-be-absent, acceptable-set, must-have-feature), classify the result (ok / risk / reject), choose the prescribed action, and ground each finding in a verbatim excerpt. Use whenever reviewing any contract — NDA, MSA, vendor DD questionnaire, lease, DPA — against a structured rules-based playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。