2,224 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only workflow that writes a safe Markdown questionnaire for another person. Use only when the user explicitly asks for a questionnaire.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route requests for current library, framework, SDK, API, CLI, or cloud-service documentation through available documentation tools and primary sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only request to restate the previous explanation plainly in the current conversation language while preserving facts and uncertainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read public X/Twitter post URLs as structured evidence through the ADHX API. Use for relevant user-provided or research-discovered x.com, twitter.com, or adhx.com links. ADHX does not search X, and long-form Article content may be incomplete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development with red-green-refactor and behavior-focused tests. Use when the user explicitly wants test-first work, a regression test before a fix, or integration tests that drive a feature through a public interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and performance problems with unclear cause. Use for root-cause debugging after a concrete symptom exists; do not use for routine implementation or speculative cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prose final-pass editor for GitHub issue bodies, pull request bodies, release notes, README/docs changes, public comments, and user-facing explanations. Use when Codex drafts or revises substantial prose that will be published or committed, especially when the user asks to polish, de-slop, make it less AI-written, improve a PR/issue body, or prepare docs text; do not use for ordinary code implementation, debugging transcripts, logs, quoted text, command output, API names, or Chinese conversational replies unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
List every `shortcut:` comment (and older `ponytail:` ones) as a debt ledger. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "ponytail debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", /ponytail-debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only interview loop for stress-testing a plan, decision, or idea. Use only when the user asks to grill, interrogate, interview, or stress-test their thinking before action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use native Worktrunk commands for explicit Git worktree operations when requested. Distinguish repository selection from worktree selection, and inspect command help before changing configuration or hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write substantial agent-consumed guidance such as skills, AGENTS.md instructions, and documents reached by agent context pointers. Do not use for ordinary README or user-facing prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate browser interactions, inspect web pages, and work with Playwright tests using a headless-first CLI workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules, interfaces, seams, adapters, leverage, and locality. Use when designing or reshaping module boundaries, making code more testable, or evaluating interface depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use only when actively changing glossary or ubiquitous-language terms, or recording a durable architectural decision; merely reading a glossary is not a trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase as a read-only senior advisor, prioritize evidence-backed improvements, and write self-contained implementation plans. Use for codebase audits, improvement roadmaps, focused planning, plan review, plan reconciliation, or executing an existing improve plan through an isolated Codex worktree. The advisor never edits source code; execution uses codex-improve and returns to the main agent for review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explicit-only workflow that writes a redacted continuation handoff to a unique temporary Markdown file. Use only when the user explicitly asks for a handoff for another session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate formal IT/hardware purchase request documents from informal requirements. Use when creating purchase justifications, cost-benefit analyses, ROI calculations, vendor comparisons, or MARP presentation slides for management approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate QR code images from text, URLs, or contact information using Python's qrcode library. Supports customization (size, margin, color, error correction) and batch generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。