「issues」の検索結果

Diagnose common Cognitum Seed device issues — won't pair, no WiFi, firmware stuck, MCP tools not appearing in Claude Code. Use when the user reports a Seed-related symptom and asks "why isn't this working?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix MARP slide layout issues including whitespace problems, box alignment, bullet formatting, and CSS rendering inconsistencies. Use when MARP slides have visual layout problems or need CSS optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze network device logs to identify connectivity issues, latency problems, and outages. Correlate timestamps across timezones, detect anomaly patterns, and generate incident reports with root cause hypotheses. Use when troubleshooting network incidents from log files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Salesforce system development and operations management. Use this skill when working with Salesforce configuration, customization, bug analysis, troubleshooting access/permission issues, designing system architecture, or implementing custom Apex/LWC development. Covers sharing settings, approval processes, trigger patterns, integration design, and data modeling best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly read-only repository audit. Grades one rotating rubric from .claude/audit-rubrics/, files between zero and five GitHub issues for what it finds, and changes no files. Use when the user asks to audit the repo, or when the audit-weekly workflow invokes it. It never edits, commits, branches, or opens pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick one open GitHub issue off this repository's queue, implement the fix, and open a pull request for it. One issue and one PR per run. Use when the user asks to burn down the issue backlog, or when the issue-burndown workflow invokes it. It never merges, never closes an issue, never edits .github/workflows/, and never acts on an issue from outside the organisation unless a maintainer has opted it in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-verify active offers vs official sources, fix drifted terms, refresh evidence, then issue, PR, review, merge unattended; report-only/no-merge modes. Use for daily checks or stale-content issues. Don't use for adding or editing one offer, or CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for potential issues and improvements. Use when asked to review specific files, functions, or code sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when the user asks to create, find, update, assign, label, prioritize, transition, or organize ISLAMU Event issues/cycles/modules in Plane via MCP; not for local todo lists or implementation-plan markdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Annuler un envoi de courrier papier déjà validé via l'API Merci Facteur (deleteEnvoi). Utiliser quand il s'agit d'annuler, supprimer, stopper, rappeler ou rembourser un courrier envoyé par erreur, d'implémenter une fenêtre d'annulation dans une application, ou de comprendre pourquoi une annulation n'a été que partielle. Couvre le contrat deleteEnvoi, l'irréversibilité de l'opération et les quatre issues possibles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews the text and structure of a document, slide deck or web page against the accessibility rules the user supplies, or a default set covering heading structure, image alternative text, colour used as the only cue, link text, reading order, tables and language, and returns numbered findings with location, rule, severity and a ready-to-apply fix for the author, plus proposed alt text and a list of checks that need a tool or a person. Use when the user asks to "check this document for accessibility", "review the alt text in this deck", "is this page accessible", "run an accessibility check on these slides", "find accessibility issues before I publish" or "check my headings and link text". Do not use for brand or template compliance of slides, use branded-deck-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a RAID log (risks, assumptions, issues, dependencies) line by line and returns a DRAFT review pack: which entries are stale, overdue, duplicated, ownerless, incomplete or misfiled, why, and a proposed update per line as current text against proposed text with the decision the project manager must take. Never re-rates, closes, merges or edits the log. Use when the user asks to "review the RAID log", "clean up the risk log", "health-check the RAID log before the steering meeting", "which risks are stale", "find duplicate risks" or "refresh the issue log". Do not use for setting up a new RAID log or logging a single new risk, issue or decision, use project-status-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns reported data problems (messages, tickets, meeting notes, complaints) into one DRAFT issue log: one row per issue with the symptom as reported, dataset and fields named, reproduction steps, affected reports, first seen date, reporters, a suggested owner, and blank severity, root cause and status cells for the owner. Never asserts a root cause, severity or fix. Use when the user asks to "log these data issues", "turn these complaints about the numbers into an issue list", "build the data quality backlog", "which reports are hit by this data problem" or "write up the reproduction steps for this data bug". Do not use for exploring or profiling a dataset, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for an IT incident write-up, use incident-postmortem-drafter; for tracking fix actions once assigned, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interact with GitHub using the `gh` CLI. Use when managing issues, PRs, workflow runs, or advanced API queries via `gh issue`, `gh pr`, `gh run`, and `gh api`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and mutate Linear issues, projects, cycles, teams, workflow states, and comments via its GraphQL API. Use when the user wants to read or change Linear data programmatically — without the MCP server, and without hand-navigating the Linear UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate Jira Cloud via its REST v3 API — issues, projects, sprints, boards, comments, transitions, JQL search. Use when the user wants to triage, bulk-update, report on, or otherwise interact with Jira programmatically without the MCP server installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate on GitHub via the REST API — repos, PRs, issues, code search, actions, releases. Use when the user wants scripted / cross-repo operations, doesn't have `gh` installed, or needs behavior the `gh` CLI doesn't expose cleanly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find live third-party GitHub issues and discussions on topics where you have real hands-on experience and artifacts, then reply with that experience to build reputation. Use when asked to answer people about your work, find threads matching your expertise, or reply with evidence from your own setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- СОРСИНГ ПОД РЕЙЗ в два трека: инвесторы из нашего VC-графа (leads.db) и покупатели-пилоты, найденные ПО СИМПТОМУ в интернете (GitHub issues, Hacker News, X, наши же репозитории, клуб СОСТАВ). Триггеры: “/raise-sourcing“, “/sourcing“, “собери список инвесторов“, “кому питчить“, “найди покупателей“, “добери лидов под рейз“, “кого звать в пилот“, “обнови стол сорсинга“, “raise sourcing“

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After shipping a repo, release or feature, find who on GitHub actually needs it: search issues, discussions and catalogs for the symptom, rank live threads and draft one precise reply per consumer. Use right after any artifact goes public. Triggers: /consumer-hunt, /ch, find consumers, where to submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。