「oop」の検索結果

Patterns for vibe coding that produce production-quality output instead of garbage. Covers prompt engineering for AI coding, verification without reading every line, accept/reject/refine decision framework, architectural guardrails, context management (CLAUDE.md, .cursor/rules), TDD-driven vibe coding, screenshot-driven development, diff review discipline, and the anti-patterns that destroy quality. Activate on: "vibe coding", "AI coding quality", "Claude Code workflow", "AI-assisted development", "how to use AI for coding", "coding with AI", "agentic engineering workflow", "AI code quality", "vibe code without garbage", "production quality AI code", "CLAUDE.md setup", "cursorrules setup", "pre-commit hooks for AI", "TDD with AI", "test-driven vibe coding". NOT for: multi-person collaborative coding sessions (use cooperative-vibe-coding), building AI/LLM applications (use ai-engineer), prompt engineering for non-coding LLM use cases (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies game theory to multi-agent coordination protocols with advisory claims, repeated interactions, daemon-mediated correlation, and deviation penalties. Use for Nash equilibrium checks, folk-theorem cooperation analysis, correlated-equilibrium routing, and price-of-anarchy audits in strategic agent systems. NOT for consumer pricing, card-game strategy, or general microeconomics outside agent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or fixing a Content Security Policy on a real site, choosing between nonce-based and hash-based CSP, adding strict-dynamic, debugging "Refused to execute inline script" errors, deploying CSP in report-only mode first, configuring report-to / report-uri, or auditing an existing policy for unsafe-inline / unsafe-eval / wildcards. Triggers: "CSP blocks legitimate inline script", strict-dynamic, nonce-{RANDOM}, sha256-{HASH}, object-src none, base-uri none, frame-ancestors, Trusted Types, X-Content-Security-Policy obsolete, report-only vs enforced. NOT for general HTTP security headers (HSTS, COOP/COEP), Trusted Types deep dive, CORS configuration, or building a WAF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing a background-job system, choosing between BullMQ / Sidekiq / RQ / Temporal / SQS, deciding queue-vs-workflow, sizing concurrency vs rate limits, building dead-letter queues, or making handlers idempotent. Triggers: jobs running twice on retry, lost jobs after worker crash, DLQ filling up, Redis OOM from job backlog, exactly-once requested, "do we need Temporal?", visibility timeout / lockDuration confusion, exponential backoff vs jitter, fan-out fan-in workflows. NOT for outbound webhook publishing (different concerns), receiver-side webhook handling (different concerns), event-streaming/Kafka topology, or in-process async (event loop only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use windags-architect), specific tool implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk-query Ensembl BioMart (and other BioMart instances) for cross-database ID mapping, gene/transcript/exon coordinates, and ortholog tables. Use when batch-converting Ensembl IDs to other namespaces (HGNC, RefSeq, UniProt, Entrez), pulling gene coordinate tables for thousands of genes, building ortholog wide-tables across species, or replacing slow Ensembl REST loops with one-shot bulk export. Encodes BioMart's XML query format, R biomaRt vs Python pybiomart trade-off, mart-vs-dataset hierarchy, and the URL endpoint that's BioMart-specific (separate from rest.ensembl.org).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trains and applies base-resolution deep learning models on ChIP-seq / ChIP-nexus / CUT&RUN data. Uses BPNet (Avsec 2021 Nat Genet 53:354; soft motif syntax from ChIP-nexus), chromBPNet (Pampari A et al 2024 bioRxiv; bias-factorized base-resolution profiles), EnFormer (Avsec 2021 Nat Methods 18:1196; 196 kb input, ~100 kb effective receptive field), DeepSEA (Zhou 2015; multi-task CNN), and JASPAR 2026 deep-learning collection (1259 BPNet ChIP models). Performs in silico mutagenesis for variant-effect prediction, DeepLIFT/Grad attribution, and TF-MoDISco motif discovery from attribution scores. Use when predicting variant effects on TF binding, discovering soft motif syntax / cooperativity, integrating ChIP-seq with sequence-only predictions, or applying precomputed JASPAR Deep Learning models to new variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a real artifact (code, training recipe, agent harness, data pipeline, prompt) against an objective and an evaluator, using Hypothesis Tree Refinement (HTR) from the Arbor paper. Use this whenever someone wants to iteratively optimize something over many experiments without overfitting — e.g. "get my model's eval score up", "improve this agent/harness", "tune this pipeline", "beat the baseline on this benchmark", "run a search over approaches and keep the best", "do an MLE-bench / Kaggle-style optimization", or any long-horizon "make this artifact better and don't just memorize the dev set" task. Trigger it even when the user doesn't say "Arbor" or "hypothesis tree" but describes repeated experiment-and-evaluate loops, branching exploration of competing ideas, or worries about a dev/test gap. Runs Claude itself as the coordinator with subagent executors in isolated git worktrees; for the standalone `arbor` CLI tool see references/arbor-upstream.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends use of hybrid closed-loop pump rather than insulin pump with CGM (without algorithm) or multiple daily injections with CGM for pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes. Triggered when deciding on insulin delivery methods for pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PM-mode brainstorm helper. Captures the requirement via Socratic dialogue before any entry phase (`/intake`, `/spec`, `/tdd`) drafts its artifact. Stage 0 skip-check, Stage 1 gap-analysis, Stage 2 probe-loop, Stage 3 confirm-and-persist. Output lives at `docs/brief/<slug>.md`. Never proposes solutions — Stage 2 dialogue discipline is structurally enforced via `discipline.mjs`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL. Join or leave an org-team coordination channel as a session peer. `/companion on <channel_id> [peer_id]` registers this Claude Code session as a `pclass:"session"` peer and works the claim → execute → signal loop, escalating un-decidable forks to the lead (never deciding). `/companion off` deregisters. `/companion status` reports the current peer. Part of org mode (Article X), which is opt-in via `velocity.org_mode.enabled` and OFF by default. Use when a human launches a second session to act as a peer alongside a lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit write_set, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by `/tdd` Step 3 and by `/swarm-dispatch` workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline and a 5-iteration RALPH loop. No scope expansion, no design decisions, no test edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude Code CLIで実装計画レビューの改善ループを回す。実装計画ファイルと要件ファイルを指定し、Claude Codeにレビューさせ、指摘をトリアージして計画を修正し、再レビューする。

Claude Code CLIでGitHub PRのコードレビューループを回す。PRのURLを指定し、Claude Codeにレビューさせ、指摘をトリアージしてコードを修正し、再レビューする。PRにリンクされたIssue等は必読として機械的に検証する。

Codex CLIで実装計画レビューの改善ループを回す。実装計画ファイルと要件ファイルを指定し、Codexにレビューさせ、指摘をトリアージして計画を修正し、再レビューする。

Codex CLIでGitHub PRのコードレビューループを回す。PRのURLを指定し、Codexにレビューさせ、指摘をトリアージしてコードを修正し、再レビューする。PRにリンクされたIssue等は必読として機械的に検証する。

当用户想要在团队中实施结构化反馈、建立360度评估机制、或现有匿名反馈产出低效结果时触发此技能。帮助设计具名、无评分、与薪酬脱钩的反馈体系。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。