「ros」の検索結果

Evolve an existing team composition by refining its structure in-place or creating a specialized variant. Covers assessing the current team against template and coordination patterns, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (adjust members, change coordination pattern, split/merge teams), applying changes to the team file and CONFIG block, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when a team's member roster is outdated, coordination pattern no longer fits, user feedback reveals workflow gaps, a specialized variant is needed alongside the original, or agents have been added or removed from the library affecting team composition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and compare levitation mechanisms for a given application through a structured trade study. Covers magnetic (passive diamagnetic, active feedback, superconducting), acoustic (standing wave, phased array), aerodynamic (hovercraft, air bearings, Coanda effect), and electrostatic (Coulomb suspension, ion traps) mechanisms. Use when selecting the most appropriate levitation approach for transport, sample handling, display, bearings, or precision measurement applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new SKILL.md file following the Agent Skills open standard (agentskills.io). Covers frontmatter schema, section structure, writing effective procedures with Expected/On failure pairs, validation checklists, cross-referencing, and registry integration. Use when codifying a repeatable procedure for agents, adding a new capability to the skills library, converting a guide or runbook into agent-consumable format, or standardizing a workflow across projects or teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit content and assets for brand compliance — style guide validation, tone of voice checking, visual identity consistency, brand asset management, and cross-channel coherence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan synthetic routes and judge whether a proposed molecule can actually be made, using AiZynthFinder's Monte-Carlo tree search over template-derived reactions and a purchasable building-block stock. Use this skill to configure expansion and filter policies, choose a stock file, run route search over a candidate set, and read the returned trees — solved fraction, route depth, and which building blocks a route bottoms out in. Also trigger on AiZynthFinder, retrosynthetic tree search, synthetic accessibility, SAscore, RAscore, building-block stock, reaction template, or route scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Policy for the cross-model council: when to hand off to an installed sibling plugin's own slash command (`/codex:*`) versus dispatching our `delegation-runner` (backend: codex|agy|…), which backend to pick, what permission posture to use, and the fan-out/cost discipline that applies regardless of backend — plus the council layer built on that substrate: which play to run, how a cast gets picked from the project roster, budget guardrails, and where project policy/commission config lives. Consult before delegating out to a peer agentic CLI, before choosing between a sibling plugin's command and our runner, before choosing a permission posture, before fanning out more than one external delegation concurrently, or before running a council play (`/…:council-run`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filter and summarise the cross-library KB audit log. Reports confidentiality events (attribution drops, synthesis aborts, dispatcher failures, no-evidence markers, cross-library promotions) over a date range, by event type, and by source handle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check the project knowledge base. Looks for contradictions between files, stale claims that newer sources have superseded, orphan files with no inbound cross-references, important concepts mentioned but lacking their own page, missing cross-references, and data gaps. Returns a structured report; does not auto-fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate datasets and resolve entities using OpenPlanter methodology — cross-reference heterogeneous sources, build Admiralty/ACH confidence-tiered evidence chains, and apply OSINT tradecraft. Triggers on entity resolution, cross-reference datasets, evidence chain, OSINT investigation, structured investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, message, and coordinate AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex CLI) running on the same machine via a shared Unix socket broker backed by SQLite. The broker wakes recipients natively (Claude inbox socket, codex queue) and turn-boundary hooks catch missed wakes. Supports cross-session task delegation, peer summaries, and session lifecycle management. Triggers on 'peer agents', 'cross-session communication', 'message Codex', 'inter-agent messaging', 'coordinate agents'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill enables cross-model dialogue between Claude and Gemini with shared visual memory. Use when the user wants to generate images, have visual dialogues with AI, create scientific illustrations with continuity, or have multiple AI perspectives respond to the same prompt. Key trigger phrases: "generate an image", "visual dialogue", "ask the daimones", "resonance field", "Minoan tarot", "cross-model", "KV cache", "MESSAGE TO NEXT FRAME".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep cross-domain synthesis engine for the vault. Triggers on "synthesize X", "what do I know about X", "connect ideas about X", "cross-domain analysis of X", "map everything in the vault about X". Searches comprehensively, surfaces non-obvious patterns and tensions, then challenges the user to generate original thought. The vault should surprise you — if synthesis only confirms what you already think, it failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured markdown session continuation documents for multi-session workflows. Captures active work streams, decisions with rationale, knowledge-file deltas learned during the session, the exact files to load next conversation, ingested content, artifacts, and open items into an ingestion-optimized handoff. Carries pending KF updates and unresolved items forward across handoff chains so context never drops. Generates a closeout checklist and echoes the starter prompt to chat. Use when approaching context limits, wrapping up a session, or managing work across conversations. Trigger on: "create a handoff," "session closeout," "wrap up this session," "build session handoff," "BSH," "continue next session," "we're running out of context," "context is getting long." Do NOT use for Memory optimization, context budget analysis, project audits, deciding whether work is ready for autonomous/Claude Code execution (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), or summaries with no continuation intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and optimizes the five global Claude layers (User Preferences, Styles, Global Memory, Skills, MCP Connectors) using the Global Layer Scorecard (six dimensions, anchored 1-5 rubrics). Detects eight cross-layer failure modes and produces evolutionary recommendations (Promotion, Demotion, Codification, Skill Extraction). Use when user says "audit my global setup," "optimize my preferences," "review my Claude configuration," "check my cross-project setup," "are my preferences working," "clean up my global memory," or "what should be in my preferences vs my project." Also use when a user has 3+ Projects and wants to improve their shared foundation. Do NOT use for single-Project audits, Project Memory optimization, or full-stack audits (use rootnode-project-audit, rootnode-memory-optimization, or rootnode-full-stack-audit respectively, if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Server Components vs Client Components in Next.js: the boundary discipline, "use client" / "use server" directives, Server Actions, what serializes across the boundary, common pitfalls. Use this skill to: - Decide whether a component should be RSC or Client. - Push the "use client" boundary as deep as possible. - Implement Server Actions correctly (auth, validation, revalidation). - Compose RSC and Client components without breaking the model. - Pass data across the boundary safely. Do NOT use this skill for: - General Next.js conventions (see nextjs-conventions). - Specific data-fetching APIs and caching (see nextjs-data-fetching). - Routing (see nextjs-routing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is deciding, reviewing, or second-guessing a software architecture or tech-stack choice — monolith vs microservices vs serverless vs event-driven, backend language, database type, caching, CQRS/event sourcing, polyglot, or a migration like Strangler Fig. Triggers on "should I use microservices", "which database", "tech stack for", "system design", or "architecture review". For how to deploy, operate, and scale that design (CI/CD, cloud, Kubernetes, IaC), use devops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is working a B2B SaaS deal from qualified opportunity to closed-won — preparing discovery calls, structuring demos or POCs, handling a specific objection, qualifying with MEDDIC/MEDDPICC/SPICED, building mutual action plans, navigating negotiation or procurement, or reviewing pipeline health, forecast accuracy, and deal velocity. Not for finding or prospecting new leads (use prospecting) or upstream positioning (use product-position).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when one reviewer is not enough because failure modes are heterogeneous, or a claim needs cross-lens pressure before it ships. Not for collapsing a decision field: use converge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a council, second opinions, or parallel investigation. Not for cross-examination of existing proposals: use cross-critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independent proposals on a contested decision need cross-critique before choosing, reusing the original authors. Not for parallel multi-stance investigation: use council.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix scattered/torn regions in hex-grid simulated annealing layouts that use "competitive flood-fill" (one tile per region per outer iteration). Use when: (1) regions of >20 tiles end up dispersed instead of forming compact blobs, (2) maxDist/sqrt(N) dispersion ratio is 10×+ worse than the ideal compact blob, (3) tiles assigned to one region show up in multiple disconnected fragments across the layout, (4) the visualization has a "trypophobia ring" pattern at the perimeter where some regions spill into a perimeter spiral, (5) an overflow spiral fallback exists in the layout code and frequently kicks in for large regions, (6) bigger regions look worse than smaller ones (small regions stay compact, big ones shred). Root cause: interleaved competitive flood-fill (round-robin one tile at a time across all regions) lets large regions get boxed in by neighbors before they finish growing — the unfilled remainder is dumped into the overflow spiral at the perimeter, far from the seed. Fix: replace with sequential region-by-region BFS — process regions in size-descending order, fully claim each region's N contiguous tiles before moving to the next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to run SQL - especially analytical SQL - on local files (parquet/csv/json), URLs, S3 paths, or remote databases (Postgres, MySQL, MongoDB, ClickHouse Cloud, Iceberg, Delta Lake) without setting up a server. Provides chDB - embedded ClickHouse SQL in Python with 1000+ functions, Session for stateful multi-step pipelines, parametrized queries, and cross-source joins via `s3()`, `mysql()`, `postgresql()`, `iceberg()`, `deltaLake()`, `remoteSecure()` table functions. TRIGGER when: user wants SQL on parquet/csv/files or across remote analytical sources; uses ClickHouse SQL features (window functions, windowFunnel, geoToH3, JSON path ops, Session, parametrized queries); imports `chdb` or calls `chdb.query()`. SKIP this skill for pandas-style DataFrame method-chaining (use chdb-datastore instead) or ClickHouse server administration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。