「scope」の検索結果

Use this skill when gathering, documenting, or validating requirements for a Salesforce marketing automation program — covering MCAE (Account Engagement / Pardot) lifecycle stages, MQL/SQL threshold definitions, scoring model specifications (sources, weights, decay, ceiling), handoff notification design, CRM field updates on status change, and sales SLA. Trigger keywords: MQL criteria, marketing-to-sales handoff, lead lifecycle, scoring requirements, automation program requirements, Marketing Cloud Automation Studio scope. NOT for building the scoring and grading rules in MCAE — use admin/mcae-lead-scoring-and-grading. NOT for a Sales-Cloud composite score built from formula fields — use admin/lead-scoring-requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Einstein Activity Capture (EAC) for an org: enable the feature, create Configuration profiles, set auth type (User-Level or Org-Level OAuth), define email and calendar sync scope, excluded domains and privacy settings, assign users, verify sync health. NOT for querying synced emails or events in SOQL, Apex or reports — use apex/einstein-activity-capture-api. NOT for Opportunity Scoring or Pipeline Inspection — use agentforce/einstein-copilot-for-sales.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when planning or executing the human side of an Agentforce or Einstein AI feature rollout — user trust-building, AI-specific training, structured feedback collection via the Feedback API, and adoption measurement via Agentforce Analytics. NOT for turning the Einstein for Sales features on — use agentforce/agentforce-sales-ai-setup. NOT for rollout training with no AI in scope — use admin/change-management-and-training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects over-broad permission requests where a narrower permission or privacy-preserving alternative API is sufficient, violating Guideline 5.1.1(iii) data minimization requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and operate the Claude Code harness for large codebases. Builds CLAUDE.md hierarchies, scoped test/lint commands, file exclusions, codebase maps, hooks, skills, subagent strategies, and LSP/MCP wiring. Use when setting up Claude Code for a new repo, auditing an existing configuration, onboarding a team, or scaling from single-developer to org-wide deployment. Triggers on "set up Claude Code for this repo", "optimize my Claude Code config", "audit my CLAUDE.md", "make this codebase navigable", "configure hooks/skills/plugins".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restate content as a flat list of atomic facts in the style of av/facts fact sheets. Use when the user says "just facts", "facts only", "as facts", "give me the facts", or replies with a bare "facts" / "facts?" to a previous message — then the scope is that message's content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a timeframe-bounded research dossier by decomposing a topic into year orchestrators and month-level research passes that each write one condensed paragraph plus sources directly into a target file. Use when the user asks for a dossier, timeline, chronology, release history, or month-by-month research bounded by specific years or months. Not for timeless explainers or single-document summaries with no temporal scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fully autonomous bug hunting pipeline — discover bugs in a scoped area using parallel subagents, independently triage each finding, fix confirmed issues with subagents, then audit all fixes against repo constraints and target platforms. Runs end-to-end without user interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The operation-generator shape for Skmtc: one definition per (path, method), for any output family — client hooks, SDK methods, forms, route stubs, docs. Output varies wildly; the DECOMPOSITION of the operation and the peer-consumption rules do not. Core teaching: every schema that appears in your output is a reference to a model generator's definition, obtained through the insert machinery — never rendered text. Use when authoring or editing a generator whose subject is operations ("write a gen for API clients/hooks/routes", "generate an SDK/form per endpoint"). Covers the projection shape only — accumulators (many operations → one file) are out of scope. Load ALONGSIDE skmtc-generator and the emitted language's skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quicken the codebase — an ad-hoc performance audit that reveals what drags (N+1 queries, needless re-renders, missing caching, memory leaks, redundant computation, hot-path complexity) and prescribes the fix, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before a perf-sensitive merge, when something feels slow, or when you want a targeted optimization pass. Replaces the old always-on `optimize` daemon worker (alias: /perf-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ward the codebase — an ad-hoc test-gap audit that reveals unguarded code (untested functions, uncovered edge cases, missing error-handling and integration tests) and conjures ready-to-paste test skeletons as protective wards against regression, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before merging risky changes or when you suspect thin coverage. Replaces the old always-on `testgaps` daemon worker (alias: /test-gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely push recovered issue-scoped fixes onto an existing PR branch without disturbing a dirty local workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate API controller scope checks to framework-enforced authorization policies while preserving ownership checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register shared claims transformation and hierarchical role policies in the API without breaking existing scope enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic planning consultant that produces decision-complete work plans through Socratic interview, codebase exploration, Metis gap analysis, and optional Momus high-accuracy review. MUST USE when the task has 5+ steps, scope is ambiguous, multiple modules are involved, or the user asks for a plan. Triggers: plan this, create a work plan, interview me, start planning, prometheustic, plan mode, help me plan this, break this down.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE for ANY work on .py .pyi .rs .ts .tsx .mts .cts .go files. One philosophy: strict types, modern stacks (Pydantic v2 / serde+thiserror / Zod / gin+sqlc+pgx+slog), modern toolchains (uv+basedpyright+ruff / cargo+clippy+miri / Bun+Biome+tsc / gofumpt+golangci-lint v2+nilaway+go-race), parse-don't-validate, exhaustive match, typed errors, no any/unwrap/panic, 250 LOC ceiling, TDD. Routes to references/{python,rust,typescript,rust-ub,go}/. Triggers: write/edit Python/Rust/TypeScript/Go code, new project, gin server, bubbletea TUI, CJK IME, connect-go RPC, sqlc pgx, branded ids, exhaustive match, unsafe Rust, miri, oversized file, refactor, TDD, e2e test, arena, allocator, bumpalo, const fn, const generics, comptime, zero-alloc, bitfield, repr, scopeguard, errdefer, Zig-like, zerocopy, packed struct.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the remote rules registry — the shared registry (often connected as a local folder or git repo) that the project's rules are published to and pulled from. Three modes, picked from the user's wording: create scaffolds a new local rules registry ("create a local rules registry", "init a rules registry"); update migrates/promotes local knowledge-base rules from .unikit/memory/ into the remote registry with automatic semver bumps ("migrate local rules to the remote registry", "promote my rules to the registry", "push local rules", "publish local rules", "update the rules registry"); sync pulls registry updates back into memory ("sync the rules registry", "pull registry updates"). Pass "--module <id>" to scope to one knowledge-base module. This skill ONLY orchestrates the CLI (`unikit-ai rules *`) — it never edits .unikit.json or .unikit/memory/ sources directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and own ONE system's design document (the A–K SYSTEM GDD) at .unikit/gamedesign/systems/SYS-<slug>.md — the depth layer of the GDD, single-system scope. Create the skeleton and walk the collaborative section-cycle to write its parameters, rules, formulas, and acceptance criteria ("detail the combat system", "write the GDD for the inventory system", "fill in the rest of this system doc", "spec out the parameters of X"), AND revise it after approval under the delta discipline ("raise the damage by 10%", "tune the economy", "rework the status system", "nerf X", "change this rule") — a number change is Tuning, a small rule a Tweak, restructuring a Rework; each bumps the version and logs the delta. To add a NEW system or restructure the system map use /unikit-gd-spec; to edit GAME.md content use /unikit-gd-spec; the moment an edit also touches a second system, a content type, a flow, or GAME.md (two or more zones) use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a brand-new game concept use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

เขียนแทนคนอื่นแบบ ghostwriter มืออาชีพ — voice matching, byline writing, ethical disclosure, scope/billing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem redefinition before problem solving. Takes a stated problem, extracts its premises, then spawns reframers applying different lenses (problem-vs-symptom, scope-shift, stakeholder-shift, level-of-abstraction, time-horizon, inversion, category-shift, constraints-shift) in isolation, and synthesizes the alternatives into a report with an orchestrator recommendation. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial project planning workflow. Explores the problem space, drafts tickets in batches, then runs sequential adversarial loops — a mandatory UX loop ("should we build this?"), zero or more discretionary specialist loops (security, performance) for projects with architectural implications in those domains, and a mandatory implementer loop ("could we build this?") — to find gaps before implementation. Creates well-specified, batch-tagged tickets upstream only after every applicable loop signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prospective failure imagination for a plan, decision, or running system. Operates in two modes — **plan mode** (a plan has not yet been committed to; imagine its catastrophic failure broadly) and **scenario mode** (a specific catastrophic scenario is posed against an existing system; investigate causes against the actual code and architecture). Spawns parallel pre-mortemers in isolation across three categories of lens: standard failure classes (technical, operational, estimation, scope, adoption, dependency, team, incentive, detection, reversibility, adversarial), 0-3 ad-hoc target-specific lenses the orchestrator names when warranted, and a first-principles lens that always runs to catch what the prescribed taxonomy misses. Synthesizes into a prioritized risk register with early-warning signals. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous bug-elimination loop. Iteratively invokes /bug-hunt and /implement-batch until findings converge below an operator-specified severity floor. At termination, runs /review-test scoped to the run's new reproducing tests and fixes quality issues above the floor. Auto-approves /bug-hunt and /review-test ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, repeated implementation failure, hard-cap exhaustion, or breaking-change proposals. Optional /refactor finisher.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploratory workflow for understanding problem spaces and drafting feature proposals, refactorings, or complex bug-fixes. Creates detailed tickets in your issue tracker without doing implementation work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。