「verify」の検索結果

Research and stress-test open-source project names, from collision checks to launch-ready decisions. Use when the user asks to name or rename a project, compare candidate names, screen GitHub or package namespace risk, verify language or mythology claims, or improve SEO/GEO clarity. Perform live web and registry research, separate brand from category descriptor, classify collisions, and return one evidence-backed recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before completion, PR, deploy, handoff, or when verifying code changes. Runs advisory or blocking checks and reports evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct reproducible web searches and decision-oriented research across official sites, search engines, news, papers, forums, social platforms, and public datasets. Use when Codex must investigate a person, organization, product, market, technical resource, reputation, career choice, or other current topic; compare candidates; verify claims; collect dated citations; distinguish facts from inference and anecdote; or write an evidence-backed research report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove a Convex feature works — seed, drive as multiple mocked users via convex-test, assert behavior including the negative authz cases (wrong user refused, data-scope enforced).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and harden Convex authorization: identity-from-arg impersonation, missing per-document ownership checks, PII-leaking public queries, and writes into containers the caller doesn't own. Deterministic scan + canonical requireIdentity/requireOwner fix + tsc verify. Use for 'secure my app' / 'audit auth' / 'who can access this data', not generic code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rehearse a live-app schema change + backfill on a snapshot-seeded preview deployment, verify, then promote the proven change to prod with the snapshot as rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove a Convex feature works — seed, drive as multiple mocked users via convex-test, assert behavior including the negative authz cases (wrong user refused, data-scope enforced).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rehearse a live-app schema change + backfill on a snapshot-seeded preview deployment, verify, then promote the proven change to prod with the snapshot as rollback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any domain folder of skills into a bounded agentic loop: compile a goal into a verifiable task plan, execute tasks with the domain's own tools, verify every task with machine-run checks, retry with caps, escalate to a human when budgets exhaust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify Stripe subscription billing cycles using a test clock. Use when you need to simulate time passing to trigger subscription renewals, recurring invoices, or to confirm that the next billing date generates the expected charge in Stripe test mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up, verify, and clean up Stripe test data end to end. Use when creating test customers, products, or subscriptions and you want a repeatable setup-then-teardown workflow, or when you need to remove leftover test customers and products with delete_stripe_test_customers, archive_stripe_test_products, and delete_stripe_test_products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse and analyze email headers to trace the origin of phishing emails, verify sender authenticity, and identify spoofing through SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check upgrade safety for a Tamanu upgrade that spans many versions: verify that every intermediate hotfix is included in the target version, and surface the new configuration/settings, data migrations, and FHIR rematerialisation impact the upgrade brings. Use when the user wants to check an upgrade from one Tamanu version to another (e.g. "check hotfixes from v2.31 to v2.47"), confirm no intermediate hotfix was dropped, or understand what config, migrations, and FHIR rework a multi-version jump requires. Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for cutting a release (see release-cutoff-checks) or deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add, update, or retire an AI provider model option for the BYOK theme generator (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) and verify the provider requests native structured output for it. Use when model lists go stale or a new provider/model is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, start, and drive the Nuxt Theme Builder in a real browser (Playwright) to verify a change end to end — editor interactions, iframe preview sync, persistence across reloads, source view. Use when asked to run/start/screenshot the app or to prove a UI or persistence change works beyond unit tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download and verify the seven platform FFmpeg archives produced for one rust-ffmpeg-splitter commit by GitHub Actions and CircleCI. Use when handing completed splitter CI binaries to rust-ffmpeg-sys without mixing commits or incomplete CI runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for critical code review that focuses on whether the code actually works correctly and achieves the expected results - not just whether it matches a design document. This skill assumes designs can be wrong, finds bugs the design didn't anticipate, and verifies end-to-end correctness. Triggers include "critical code review", "deep code review", "verify this implementation works", "find bugs in this code", or reviewing implementation against requirements. NOTE - Security review is OUT OF SCOPE; use a dedicated security review skill for that purpose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

IT要求・活動インパクトスコアの良い点・悪い点を分析し、改善点と改善のための問いを生成

価値概念スコアの良い点・悪い点を分析し、改善点と改善のための問いを生成

価値概念とIT要求・活動のスコア乖離検証結果の良い点・悪い点を分析し、改善のための問いを生成

ビジョンの良い点・悪い点を分析し、改善点と改善のための問いを生成