2,238 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiabl
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cleans up and improves existing code without changing behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build email segments from my list", "make engaged / lapsed / RFM segments", "set up cart-abandoner or lifecycle-stage audiences", or "build a suppression list of unsubscribes and bounces"; turns the user's OWN list/CRM/GA4/ecommerce export into behavioral, attribute, and lifecycle-stage segments plus a suppression list, with per-segment sizes labeled Measured/Estimated, informing the SEND E (Engagement/targeting) dimension. Not for scoring EQS or running vetoes — use email-quality-auditor; not for authentication or spam-content checks — use deliverability-qa. 邮件列表分群/生命周期分群/抑制名单/流失召回
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Documentation structure and maintenance rules for the Megahub project. Use whenever making user-facing changes — adding features, changing behavior, fixing hardware compatibility, or modifying configuration. Describes which files to update, the README structure, and writing style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, "make a control skill for this repo", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, product analytics warehouse) in parallel, then returns a cited read on decisions and tradeoffs. Use how for runtime behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and analyze Estuary task logs with jq filtering. Use when investigating task failures, debugging connector errors, analyzing behavior patterns, or streaming live logs. Use when user says "check logs", "show me logs", "task failing", "why is my capture failing", "why is my materialization failing", "error messages", "why did it fail", "search task logs", "shard failed", "follow logs", "increase log level", "debug logging", "is this log message normal", "what does this message mean", "connection timeout", or "i/o timeout".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements data visualization charts in Flutter using the fl_chart package (v1.2.0). Supports LineChart, BarChart, PieChart, ScatterChart, RadarChart, and CandlestickChart with implicit animations, touch interactivity, and pan/zoom transformations. Use when building any Flutter chart, graph, or data visualization — including line graphs for trends, bar charts for comparisons, pie/donut charts for proportions, scatter plots for distributions, radar charts for multi-axis comparisons, or candlestick charts for financial OHLC data. Also use when customizing chart axes, titles, tooltips, grid lines, touch callbacks, chart animations, or chart zoom/pan behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace BIRD routing-daemon behavior through the actual C source tree. Use for implementation questions, suspected upstream bugs, parser/keyword origins, filter instructions, protocol state machines, route attributes, birdc commands, stack traces, or BIRD 2 versus BIRD 3 source comparisons. Prefer a local checkout or exact upstream tag/commit and cite concrete files, functions, and revisions. Route config linting to bird-agent and active incidents to bird-troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven application audit protocol for security, authorization, privacy, concurrency, state integrity, reliability, performance, accessibility, visual consistency, responsive behavior, and release readiness. Use for incremental checks, pre-merge review, pre-launch audits, high-stakes deep audits, AI-generated code review, hardening, or release-gate design. Prefer this protocol over ad-hoc review when the user asks whether software is safe or ready to ship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, runs and reviews mobile tests across Flutter, native Android, native iOS, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform. Covers Dart widget/integration tests, JUnit/Compose/Espresso, XCTest/XCUITest, Jest/Detox, and KMP common/target tests. Use to add, fix, run or audit tests, test setup, mocks, coverage and flaky tests for a real app behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for configuring an autonomous software delivery factory. Use when choosing feedback sources, schedules, worktree behavior, autonomy gates, or drafting proposed host automations for report-only review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a project follows a structured operating model with: two work lanes (Domain, System), unresolved work tracked as Epic, bounded execution tracked as Ticket, role-based behavior (architect, runner), helper-backed SQLite workflow tables, inbox and outbox files as task and result bodies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mandatory skills, conventions, and behavioral rules for Avalonia UI development using the Zafiro toolkit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Understand audience demographics, preferences, behavior patterns, and engagement quality across Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on re...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for Nauthilus configuration loading, config schema and defaults, Viper-backed config formats, config dump behavior, vim syntax generation, template validation, prompt guideline sync, documentation under README/IDP/server docs, config converters, and generated documentation or syntax artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Govern FriendlyBet agent values, professional standards, anti-hallucination behavior, truthfulness, risk reporting, AI resource discipline, feedback loops, skill improvement, performance reviews, decision-rights hygiene, and team quality. Use when creating, reviewing, promoting, correcting, or retiring agents; reducing hallucinations or mistakes; reviewing AI/tool usage; handling agent incidents; or aligning work with Eyal's philanthropic user-first approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。