「issue」の検索結果

Writes Spark jobs, debugs performance issues, configures cluster settings for distributed data processing, DataFrame transformations, and structured streaming analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integrates with Atlassian products to manage project tracking and documentation via MCP protocol, including Jira issue management, Confluence page editing, sprint and backlog management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement features on branches from issue descriptions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and remediate per-node issues on a HyperPod cluster (EKS or Slurm) — a specific node is unhealthy, unresponsive, stuck, or needs replacing. Covers on-node EFA, GPU / accelerator hardware (XID, ECC, NVLink, row-remap, DCGM), Slurm node down/drained, disk and memory pressure, per-node lifecycle-script failures, SSM agent, container runtime, kernel panics, pod networking. Read-only. Not for cluster-wide provisioning (→ hyperpod-cluster-debugger), NCCL (→ hyperpod-nccl), or MFU (→ hyperpod-mfu-debugger).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose NCCL failures and adjacent training-pod failures on HyperPod GPU clusters (EKS or Slurm) — training hangs, AllReduce / collective-op timeouts, EFA or libfabric errors, rendezvous failures, EFA TCP fallback, /dev/shm or memlock issues, NCCL version mismatch across pods, container OOM / exit-137 / OOMKilled, GPU OOM (CUDA out of memory), CrashLoopBackOff / Pending pods, MASTER_ADDR DNS, NetworkPolicy blocking. Not for single-node hardware faults (→ hyperpod-node-debugger § G) or cluster-creation EFA / SSM failures (→ hyperpod-cluster-debugger § A / § F).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnostic-only skill for Slurm scheduler and node-daemon issues on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod Slurm clusters. Scope mirrors the HyperPod troubleshooting guide. Invoke when the user reports a Slurm node stuck in down/drain, "Node unexpectedly rebooted" after auto-repair, slurmd not running, jobs stuck PENDING with REASON=Resources while sinfo shows idle nodes, jobs stuck COMPLETING after node replacement, GRES/GPU counts wrong, scontrol ping failing, slurmctld unresponsive, an Action:Reboot/Replace request that did not trigger HyperPod auto-recovery, or auto-resume not restarting a job. Also triggers on "drain before reboot", "diagnose a Slurm node", "investigate stuck jobs."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check and compare software component versions on SageMaker HyperPod cluster nodes - NVIDIA drivers, CUDA toolkit, cuDNN, NCCL, EFA, AWS OFI NCCL, GDRCopy, MPI, Neuron SDK (Trainium/Inferentia), Python, and PyTorch. Use when checking component versions, verifying CUDA/driver compatibility, detecting version mismatches across nodes, planning upgrades, documenting cluster configuration, or troubleshooting version-related issues on HyperPod. Triggers on requests about versions, compatibility, component checks, or upgrade planning for HyperPod clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate, modernize, and upgrade codebases to AWS. Run analysis on repos for tech debt, security vulnerabilities, and modernization opportunities. Transforms .NET Framework to .NET 8/10, mainframe COBOL to Java, VMware VMs to EC2, SQL Server to Aurora, and upgrades Java/Python/Node.js versions and AWS SDKs. Use when the user says "migrate .NET to AWS", "upgrade Java to 17/21", "modernize COBOL", "modernize mainframe", "move VMware to EC2", "convert SQL Server to Aurora", "upgrade Python version", "migrate AWS SDK", "transform this codebase", "analyze for issues", "find tech debt", "what tech debt", "security vulnerabilities", "CVEs", "what's wrong with my code", "assess my repos", "where do I start", "find what's outdated", "analyze my repos", "AWS Transform - continuous modernization", "continuous modernization" or "continuous-modernization". Don't use for infrastructure provisioning, CI/CD pipelines, or general coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a batch of content in one run: ranked quality report, systemic issues. "score our whole content library"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Present pathway options and orchestrate place-based curriculum design from a local place, curriculum requirement, or community issue. Use when place should become a primary text for learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate compassionate systems tools from issue or aspiration to wise action. Use when a class needs a complete inquiry workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map curriculum connections across multiple subjects for a real-world problem or authentic context. Use when planning cross-curricular projects or connecting content to real issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create SEO-driven pages at scale using templates and data. Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "template pages," "pages at scale," "directory pages," "location pages," "[keyword] + [city] pages," "comparison pages," "integration pages," "building many pages for SEO," "pSEO," "generate 100 pages," "data-driven pages," or "templated landing pages." Use this whenever someone wants to create many similar pages targeting different keywords or locations. For auditing existing SEO issues, see seo-audit. For content strategy planning, see content-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, privacy policy, or user agreement, or mentions specific concerns like auto-renewal or data authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide to review incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement', or uploads a PDF NIL contract for review. Identifies red flags, missing protections, and compliance issues. Produces a structured review memorandum with negotiation positions. Do NOT use for general contract review, employment agreements, non-NIL endorsements, or brand-side deal analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and cite French case law and statutes with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about French or European court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, needs counts of decisions on a point, or asks what a code article says at a given date, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoice review, non-compliance flagging, rejection communication, billing trend analysis, and conversation preparation for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel. Review invoices against billing guidelines; flag block billing, prohibited fees, rate violations, staffing violations, late submission. Produce line-item review report and approval note. Draft rejection letter to outside counsel. Build invoice review checklist. Analyse billing trends across multiple invoices and produce a structured conversation guide for the relationship review. Identify systemic patterns and produce formal non-compliance notice. Trigger on: 'review this invoice', 'flag billing issues', 'check invoice against guidelines', 'write the rejection letter', 'build an invoice checklist', 'block billing', 'UTBMS', 'billing non-compliance', 'analyse our invoices', 'billing trends', 'prep for the billing conversation', 'relationship review', 'the firm keeps doing this', 'escalate'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。