9,804 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "decide reasoning effort", "set a thinking budget", "when to use extended thinking", "tune reasoning vs cost", or "should this task use a reasoning model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production incident response. Use when handling incidents, classifying severity, reconstructing timelines, writing postmortems, generating comms templates, or building response playbooks with severity scoring and RCA frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, review, and validate Google Cloud (GCP) architectures. Use when choosing GCP compute, storage, networking, or identity services, or applying the Google Cloud Architecture Framework (reliability, security, cost, performance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AWS serverless architectures for startups with IaC. Use when designing serverless architecture, writing CloudFormation, optimizing AWS costs, setting up CI/CD, or migrating to AWS across Lambda, API Gateway, and DynamoDB.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "batch LLM requests", "should I use the batch API", "estimate batch vs realtime cost", "design a bulk LLM job", or "process thousands of prompts cheaply".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cloud posture security across AWS, Azure, and GCP — IAM least privilege, public exposure, encryption, logging coverage, landing-zone guardrails. Use when auditing a cloud account, before a production launch, or after a scan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate scientific conference posters using LaTeX templates
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate scientific posters in PowerPoint format
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes PostgreSQL queries, configures replication, implements advanced features including EXPLAIN analysis, JSONB operations, extension usage, and VACUUM tuning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy applications to AWS. Triggers on phrases like: deploy to AWS, host on AWS, run this on AWS, AWS architecture, estimate AWS cost, generate infrastructure. Analyzes any codebase and deploys to optimal AWS services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Schedule social posts to connected platforms at best times, approval-gated. "schedule this post for Monday"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish a blog post to WordPress or Webflow with SEO metadata, approval-gated. "publish this post to WordPress"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your operations manager. Works out how the business actually runs on day one: suppliers and what they cost, who works when, the step-by-step routines for opening, serving or shipping and closing, the tools to run it, the licences and permits to check, and a risk register with what to do when each thing goes wrong. Feeds real costs back to the CFO. Use when the user says "how do I run this", "operations", "suppliers", "staffing", "SOPs", "what do I need to open", "permits", or "day one".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Your CFO. Builds the unit economics of a business before money is spent: what one unit earns after its direct costs, the real profit margin at the planned volume, the break-even point in units a day, year 1 month by month, the cash needed before it pays for itself, how long the startup spend takes to earn back, and what happens if the price drops, sales come in low or costs rise. Every number traces to an input the user can check. Use when the user says "find the profit margins", "do the numbers", "is this profitable", "break-even", "unit economics", "how much do I need to start", or "run the CFO".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design formative assessments that make students' historical thinking visible — revealing whether they source, close-read, contextualise, and corroborate. Use when assessing historical thinking skills or planning a diagnostic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a learning progression showing prerequisite-to-mastery steps for a target skill or understanding. Use when sequencing content, designing diagnostics, or mapping prerequisite gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ricerca giuridica su fonti italiane e UE: normativa, prassi e giurisprudenza in ogni materia (civile, penale, amministrativo, lavoro, tributario e specialistiche). Usare quando l'utente chiede di trovare, inquadrare o citare una norma ("cosa dice l'articolo...", "quale legge disciplina...", "è ancora in vigore...", "che estremi ha..."), cercare sentenze, massime o orientamenti, verificare la vigenza di una disposizione, verificare una citazione o l'esistenza di una pronuncia ("questa sentenza esiste?", "controlla le citazioni di questo atto"), cercare precedenti a favore e contro una tesi ("conformi e difformi", "sentenze pro e contro"), trovare un CCNL o le decisioni di ABF, ACF, AGCM o del Garante, creare un documento fondato su fonti (atti, pareri, clausole, contratti, memorie, diffide), o impostare una strategia processuale ("come imposto la causa", "come gestiresti questo caso", "conviene agire o transigere"), anche quando la fonte non è nominata. Non usare per domande non giuridiche.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compliant, retrieval-grounded research over investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) awards and decisions. Use when the user asks about ICSID / investment-treaty arbitration cases, awards, or doctrines (fair and equitable treatment, expropriation, jurisdiction, costs, annulment, etc.) and wants answers grounded in the actual document text with pinpoint citations. Identifies the correct document on the case page, confirms it against the PDF's own first pages, retrieves primary documents on demand from ICSID, PCA, etc., never scrapes or hosts a corpus in violation of applicable terms, and cites only retrieved text.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page interactive site, a Microsoft Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or a LaTeX/PDF. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Visual design is opinionated but the user can override colors, fonts, and brand label. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。