「does」の検索結果

Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies bug fixes are correct and complete by tracing callers, checking imports/exports, validating path resolution, and confirming no regressions. Does the code work? Use when reviewing code changes for functional correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and analyze Reddit discussions for market research, product feedback, and community insights using Xpoz. Use when asked to "search Reddit", "what does Reddit think about X", "Reddit feedback on X", "subreddit analysis", or "Reddit market research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Study a merged or shipped tdmcp implementation and extract reusable learnings: code improvements, runtime/UX lessons, test gaps, docs updates, roadmap items, and harness changes. Use when the user asks to learn from a completed feature/project/PR/build, analyze what can be improved from an implementation, or turn a real installation experience into actionable tdmcp improvements. This is a post-implementation learning harness; it does not replace tdmcp-pipeline for building or tdmcp-quality-audit for broad repo audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check invoices and receipts line by line against your offers and list what matches, what differs and what has no offer. Nothing is paid or sent. Use for "check my invoices", "match invoices to offers", "does this invoice match the quote".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview a project folder into AOS and write the result: a stable slug and domain in .aos/project.json, an OpenWiki wiki that is actually watched and does not index junk, memB memory bound to the slug, a Synapse map, AGENTS.md with its harness symlinks, and optionally CI and issue triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose animation values that feel native on Apple platforms instead of guessing springs. Use when: picking a spring/duration/easing for any transition; an animation "feels off", sluggish, floaty, wobbly, or cheap; tuning a sheet, drawer, panel, selection lens, button press, or drag release; wiring gesture-driven motion; or someone asks "what spring should I use", "why does this feel wrong", "make it feel native/premium", "match Apple's feel". Also fires on hand-picked magic numbers in .spring(), on animations that jump when interrupted, and on motion that only starts after a gesture ends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Liquid Glass material best practices for SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit on iOS 26+/macOS 26+ (Tahoe) through iOS 27/macOS 27. Use when implementing, reviewing, or migrating to glass: glassEffect, Glass variants (.regular/.clear/.identity), tint, interactive(), GlassEffectContainer, glassEffectUnion, toolbar glass, ToolbarSpacer, scrollEdgeEffectStyle, sharedBackgroundVisibility, tabBarMinimizeBehavior, backgroundExtensionEffect, NSGlassEffectView, UIGlassEffect, Tahoe window chrome, glass accessibility (Reduce Transparency/Increase Contrast), pre-26 Material fallbacks, UIDesignRequiresCompatibility. Also fires on symptoms: glass renders dark or muddy, glass looks like a flat tinted rectangle, glass button doesn't register taps, tap passes through glass, "'glassEffect' is only available in iOS 26.0 or newer", "ambiguous use of 'opacity'", "'cornerRadius' was deprecated", glass looks different in simulator vs device, screenshots of glass UI don't match. For glass animation, morphing, glassEffectID, transitions, Metal shaders, or performance profiling use the liquid-glass-motion skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply platform accessibility best practices to SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit code. Essential companion to any SwiftUI, UIKit, or AppKit skill — always use together. Use whenever writing, editing, or reviewing ANY SwiftUI views, UIKit view controllers, AppKit views/window controllers, or platform UI — even when the user doesn't mention accessibility. Also use when the user mentions VoiceOver, Voice Control, Dynamic Type, Reduce Motion, screen reader, a11y, WCAG, accessibility audit, Nutrition Labels, accessibilityLabel, UIAccessibility, NSAccessibility, assistive technologies, or Switch Control. Not for server-side Swift, non-UI packages, or CLI tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply critical rationalist epistemology (Popper, Deutsch) to evaluate reasoning, identify errors, and refine understanding. Use when the user explicitly requests help with reasoning - phrases like "help me think this through", "does this make sense", "any flaws in this", "what am I missing", "critique this", "is this reasoning sound", "stress test this idea", "devil's advocate", or any request to evaluate arguments, identify logical problems, or improve thinking. Also use when errors in reasoning are significant enough to materially affect the user's goals, even if not explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trading strategy builder for coding agents. Use when Codex, Claude, Cursor, or a SKILL.md host needs to turn a trading idea into market Evidence, an inspectable Signal, a private Replay, Replay status, or an opt-in Studio Publication. Stingray does not place trades.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A clear description of what this skill does and when to use it. Include specific trigger phrases like "do X" or "help me with Y". Also include negative triggers — "do NOT use when..." — to prevent false activations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and troubleshoot WorkOS AuthKit authentication issues with Convex. Use when authentication fails, JWT validation errors occur, user identity returns null, email claims are missing, admin access checks fail, or sign in button does not work. Supports Netlify deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or changing Skyline UI (apps/syn-ui, packages/syn-ui/*) from a design - "build this screen from the board", "implement the design", "match the canvas", "new board landed", "build the Eval trend panel", "port this screen to Skyline", "does this match the design", "update the Shipped table", "snapshot the boards". Covers reading a `*.dc.html` board and the Skyline spec, building from them, comparing 1440px and 390px screenshots against the board, and recording the shipped screen. Do NOT use for small tweaks to a screen that has already shipped (change the code directly, no board needed), for the frozen React app apps/syn-dashboard-ui (never edit it), or for refreshing the CI screenshot baselines alone (see design/README.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding WHERE to do work on Syntropic137 itself - "run this through Syntropic", "dispatch a workflow", "should this go in a workspace or local", "kick off a run on the Mini", "dogfood this", "build Syntropic inside Syntropic", "why did the agent's push fail", "can an agent run our QA", "the execution says completed but nothing shipped". Covers what a workspace agent can and cannot do, why `.github/workflows` pushes must come from the local machine, how to write a task prompt that does not repeat a known failure, and how to verify a run actually delivered. Do NOT use for PR/release mechanics (see `devops`), for using the `syn` CLI as an end user (see the syntropic137 plugin skills), or for authoring workflow YAML.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, running, or judging an experiment on a Syntropic137 workflow - comparing prompt variants, fan-out vs single agent, adversarial cross-model review, model selection (can Haiku do this job), phase splits, or tool grants. Trigger phrases include "run a workflow experiment", "A/B the workflow", "does fan-out help", "which model for this phase", "is this prompt better", "measure review quality", "why did the workflow do that". Do NOT use for a one-off workflow run that is just doing work, for authoring a workflow that is not being compared against anything, or for debugging a single failed execution (that is ordinary debugging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: a general codebase assessment, pre-migration/pre-rewrite review, or explicit security-focused request needs a structured, repeatable security audit pass covering hardcoded secrets, injection-prone constructs, auth/debug backdoors, and insecure config defaults. Complements (does not replace) the built-in /security-review command. Not a mandatory gate on every ticket.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the team lead points Architect at a prior agistra.dev hub path and asks it to check for or perform additional migration — trigger phrasing such as 'migrate my data from <path>', 'check what didn't get migrated', 'did we miss anything from my old hub', or 'do a completeness pass on <path>'. Walks the prior hub's full directory tree read-only, diffs it against the fixed scripted migration scope plus any existing migration report, and asks the team lead one clear question at a time about anything a scripted migration would never have discovered. Never writes or copies anything itself — every confirmed item is delegated to the existing migration primitives. Do not use for the first-run scripted migration prompt during `npm run setup` — that is unrelated, already-automated flow this skill does not replace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production. This skill covers LLM integration patterns, RAG architecture, prompt engineering that scales, AI UX that users trust, and cost optimization that doesn't bankrupt you. Use when: keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests APIs for excessive data exposure where endpoints return more data than the client application needs, relying on the frontend to filter sensitive fields. The tester intercepts API responses and analyzes them for leaked PII, internal identifiers, debug information, or sensitive business data that the UI does not display but the API transmits. This maps to OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving API data leakage testing, excessive data e...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and operate a WeChat editorial content library in Busabase. Use when a team wants reusable source material, linked article drafts, an editorial kanban board, a publishing calendar, or a source-check and review queue. Keeps source documents and article scheduling in two linked Bases; does not publish to WeChat or approve an agent's own proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。