「rd」の検索結果

Orchestrator for the Creative Production skill set — turn a brief into reviewable visual assets. Routes to the right sub-skill (explore, moodboard, positioning, offer, ads-explorer, scene, shot, polish) based on where you are in the creative process. Use when the user gives a high-level creative goal like "make campaign assets", "I need visuals for X", "produce ad creative", "design product shots", or isn't sure which creative step they need. Delegates to creative-* skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user says "simmer this", "refine this", "hone this", "iterate on this", or asks to improve a specific artifact over multiple rounds. Runs an iterative refinement loop with investigation-first judges that read the code, understand the problem, and propose evidence-based improvements. Auto-selects single judge or multi-judge board based on complexity. Works on any artifact type: documents, prompts, specs, emails, creative writing, API designs, pipelines, codebases. Supports multi-file workspace targets, runnable evaluators, and open-ended optimization (model selection, pipeline topology, prompt tuning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

First-run setup wizard for the Recruiter Skills Pack. Creates config, verifies API keys, shows available skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial dialectic tool inspired by GAN. Alternates between Generator (creative advocate) and Discriminator (adversarial critic). Supports forced role selection (g/d), intensity modes (hard/soft), and multi-language output. Use for stress-testing ideas, business plans, code, and spec designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save important context to persistent memory for future sessions. PROACTIVELY USE THIS when you detect: - Decisions: "let's go with", "decided to", "chose", "went with" - Learnings: "I learned", "turns out", "TIL", "realized", "discovered" - Errors resolved: "fixed", "the problem was", "solution was" - Client info: names, emails, phone numbers, addresses, invoice amounts - Preferences: "I prefer", "I like", "don't like", "always use" - References: API keys locations, file paths, URLs, credentials - Patterns: "pattern", "convention", "always do", "standard approach" - Important commands run worth remembering Do NOT ask permission - just capture silently when these patterns appear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a lightweight Markdown concept handoff from existing decisions and evidence. Use when explicitly asked for a developer handoff, to transfer a prototype or concept to another team, or to prepare a brief for implementation. Not for ordinary prototype completion, building, reviewing or publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates or updates believable deterministic raw fixture scenarios without breaking an existing prototype. Use when asked to add or change fixtures, seed data, sample data, scenarios, or cross-record relationships. Not for UI redesign, live-data infrastructure, or unrelated commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for explicit agent-browser CLI checks or a named browser capability neither the Copilot canvas nor configured Playwright MCP can supply. Ordinary rendered checks and browser selection belong to browser-canvas-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits actual components and routes against applicable WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria using consumer-owned design-system evidence and repository tools. Use when asked for an accessibility audit, a11y check, keyboard or focus review, contrast check, or screen-reader verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record measured or directly seen security-research behavior as cited Observations, classify it against reusable security concepts, and decide whether it remains an observation, becomes a Lead, or supports a Finding. Use after passive analysis, a tool run, a probe, a crash, a timing anomaly, or a user-supplied behavioral report produces noteworthy evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Offload builds, tests, or artifact verification to authorized SSH hosts and isolated worktrees; synchronize remote fixes into dedicated coordinator commits and preserve reproducible build provenance. Use for spare development capacity and remote build troubleshooting. Paid provisioning requires a separate resource lifecycle contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate eval, benchmark, load-test or batch campaigns on authorized SSH hosts or short-lived rented hosts, with isolated jobs, configured-path canaries, telemetry and evidence. Use manage-remote-resources for paid resource ownership and run-remote-builds for build-only offload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use common CLI, Kali, and shell tools to inspect web Targets, captured assets, logs, HAR/PCAP files, packages, and generated artifacts, then turn observations into Evidence, Security Signals, and ranked Hypotheses. Use when the user asks for web bug-hunting inspection, digital records, URL maps, crawling, endpoint discovery, JS bundle/package analysis, light forensics, or command-line investigation workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive, citation-grounded review of security-relevant specifications, protocols, standards, APIs, and implementations. Use when a reviewer must trace external preconditions and invariants into source code without treating a cited claim as proof of a vulnerability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Passive code-review lane for authorized repositories, local checkouts, uploaded source archives, and diffs. Use when the security research agent needs deterministic candidate discovery before expensive AI investigation, scoped PR-style review, append-only evidence records, or independent revalidation of code findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze suspicious SMS/email messages, phishing links, redirects, domains, payloads, malware indicators, and suspected C2 infrastructure safely. Use when the user provides spam, smishing/phishing content, raw .eml headers, URLs, QR links, attachments, hashes, strange payloads, redirect chains, DNS/WHOIS/RDAP questions, C2 clues, exploit-chain questions, or asks what defenses to apply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates React projects and components from Radix UI to Base UI. Use when asked to migrate from radix, move to base-ui, convert radix primitives, or switch a shadcn project's base library. Handles single components ("migrate accordion") and whole projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply npm/pnpm supply-chain hardening when adding a dependency, editing package.json/.npmrc/pnpm-workspace.yaml, reviewing a lockfile change, or configuring CI install steps. Covers the 17 practices from lirantal/npm-security-best-practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and scaffold plugin directories for Codex with a required `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional plugin folders/files, and baseline placeholders you can edit before publishing or testing. Use when Codex needs to create a new local plugin, add optional plugin structure, or generate or update repo-root `.agents/plugins/marketplace.json` entries for plugin ordering and availability metadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end smoke against the local rembric dev server (`pnpm run dev`, host Next.js dev on :3000). Apply when the user says "smoke", "probar contra docker", "dev:up", or after applying an OpenSpec change that touches HTTP (`apps/web/src/app/api/`), MCP tools (`packages/mcp/src/`), or DB migrations (`packages/db/src/migrations/`). Encodes bring-up, readiness verification, probe pattern and teardown — not the probes themselves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Call this skill when faced with "wicked problems", complex challenges, or when a user asks for strategic innovation, root-cause analysis, or long-term problem solving. Do not use for simple, linear tasks. This skill forces the agent to bypass superficial symptoms, map the entire ecosystem, and anticipate second-order consequences before proposing an intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。