「ste」の検索結果

Structured debugging methodology — reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify. Covers git bisect, binary search, logging, and minimal reproduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify that a Markdown file has correct formatting — headings, lists, links, code blocks, spacing, and consistent style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using session replay. Watches two promises the replay product makes: that sessions are actually being recorded (capture integrity — recording volume vanishing while site traffic doesn't), and that the friction evidence inside recordings gets seen (rage-click / dead-click clusters concentrating on a page or element, error-after-interaction cohorts, recurring replay vision themes nobody aggregates). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` evaluation stream for contradictions between a flag's configured state and its real traffic: evaluation cliffs on healthy flags, ghost flags (code calling keys that no longer exist), response-distribution shifts with no corresponding flag edit, and flag debt (stale, fully-rolled-out, or dead flags still burning evaluations). Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using error tracking. Watches `$exception` bursts, stuck loops, multi-fingerprint clusters, status regressions, and stack-trace activity-name patterns. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog setup health. Reads the project's active health issues — the deterministic findings of PostHog's own health checks (no live events, outdated SDKs, missing reverse proxy, absent web vitals, ingestion warnings, failing data-warehouse models, and more) — and decides which are genuinely worth surfacing. Unlike a one-signal-per-issue push, it bundles kind-clusters into a single finding, weights by real blast radius (cross-referencing actual event volume and reach), and prioritizes issues an agent can resolve via the MCP. Emits only above the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects running surveys. Watches active surveys for score regressions (NPS / CSAT / rating drops), response-volume drops, abandonment spikes, and targeting drift, AND aggregates open-text responses into recurring themes the team should know about (clusters of complaints, praise, feature requests). Emits findings only when a theme or anomaly clears the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects moving data through pipelines. Watches the three delivery surfaces — CDP destinations and transformations (hog functions), batch exports, and hog flows (workflows/messaging) — for contradictions between configured state and actual delivery: functions the watcher quietly degraded or disabled, failure rates stepping above a pipeline's own baseline, batch export runs failing or stalling (a growing data gap), and active flows failing for the people they trigger on. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using AI observability. Rotates through a set of lenses — cost, latency, errors, volume, eval performance, eval/enrichment config, clusters, and tool usage — watching each for trends and spikes sliced by the dimensions it discovers over time. Leans on the sandbox's bundled `exploring-llm-*` deep-dive skills for the actual queries. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other scouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up a GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline with linting, testing, type-checking, and deployment steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write effective prompts for LLMs — structure, few-shot examples, chain-of-thought, system prompts, and output parsing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses CI and pull-request pipeline health for a GitHub repo using the engineering analytics MCP tools — pull-requests (PR list with CI status), workflow-health (per-workflow CI trends), and pr-lifecycle (a single PR's timeline). Use when asked whether CI is getting faster or slower, which GitHub Actions workflow is the slow or flaky long-pole, how long PRs take from open to merge, how an author's merge time compares to the cohort, which open PRs have failing or pending CI, or where a specific pull request is stuck. Triggers on "engineering analytics", "is CI getting slower", "slow workflow", "flaky CI", "time to merge", "cycle time", "PR throughput", "failing checks", "where is PR <n> stuck", "CI long pole", "what's holding up this PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a PostHog endpoint with the right shape on the first try — covers query kind choice, name conventions, what to expose as variables (HogQL code_name vs insight breakdown), data_freshness_seconds, and whether to materialise on day one. Use when the user says "create an endpoint", "expose this query as an API", "turn this insight into an endpoint", or asks for help structuring a new endpoint. Steers away from common mistakes: materialising a query with cohort breakdowns or compare mode, inline-only variables on a materialised endpoint, unbounded date ranges, ambiguous names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find feature flags that were soft-deleted in the active project within a recent time window. Use when the user asks "what flags were deleted in the last N days", "show me recently deleted feature flags", "who deleted flag X", "audit recent flag deletions", or anything similar. Handles the non-obvious gotcha that system.feature_flags exposes the deleted boolean but does not expose a deletion timestamp — the actual deleted-at time lives in the per-flag activity log and must be cross-referenced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。