4,028 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Before showing the user any substantive GTM deliverable (positioning, value prop, homepage, launch post, pricing, sales script, the brief, the market research, or the roadmap), stress-test it against the standard as an independent critic, because the agent that wrote it is the worst judge of whether it is good. Use as a gate right before presenting work, or when the user asks whether something is actually strong.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating, writing, reviewing, annotating, repairing, refactoring, or validating readable Verilog RTL, including synthesizable Verilog-2001 .v files, existing-RTL analysis, semantic comment annotation, testbench scaffold planning, ASIC-quality review, local or remote Vivado/xsim validation, evidence-backed repair, and workflow trace diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach workers, employees, and individual contributors to turn meetings, transcripts, minutes, and work notes into better execution: infer leader expectations, diagnose previous work, identify next actions, judge delivery readiness, and prepare a high-bandwidth update. Use after meetings, during work, before reviews, or across repeated low-value discussions. Perform semantic review from source evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: This skill contains dual-use security techniques. Before proceeding with any bypass or analysis: > 1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a Mac awake with caffeinate during long builds, downloads, or supervised automation runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Core UI/UX engineering skill for building highly interactive, spatial, weightless, and glassmorphism-based web interfaces using GSAP and 3D CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release work; not ordinary contribution tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A meta-skill that understands task requirements, dynamically selects appropriate skills, tracks successful skill combinations using agent-memory-mcp, and prevents skill overuse for simple tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prompt engineering regression test matrix register: baseline outputs, semantic drift thresholds, judge evaluations, and golden dataset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding tasks to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) only when the user explicitly requests it, while the orchestrator retains review and landing responsibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze cross-channel campaign data, quantify uncertainty, and propose evidence-labeled budget tests without overstating causality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides DPIA for health and medical data processing covering Art. 9(2)(h)-(j) exemptions, HIPAA crosswalk for transatlantic operations, clinical trial data protection under EU CTR 536/2014, and genetic data specifics under Art. 9(1). Activate for healthcare systems, clinical research, health apps, or medical device data. Keywords: health data, DPIA, Art. 9, clinical trial, genetic data, HIPAA, medical records, special category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts privacy auditing of AI models including training data extraction testing, membership inference attacks, model inversion testing, and attribute inference assessment. Uses ML Privacy Meter and related tools to quantify privacy leakage. Keywords: model audit, membership inference, privacy meter, model inversion, training data extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a new Claude Code agent (subagent) from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the agent's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, domain focus and vocabulary, role identity, anti-patterns, description, model tier, tools, and self-containment — then reviews the finished agent against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new agent or subagent. Does not build a skill or slash command — use skill-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes and reviews composables for Compose and CMP: the Route/Screen/leaf split, state-read placement and stability, loading/empty/error UX states, LazyColumn lists and grids, animation choice, accessibility and semantics, design-system tokens, CMP Res resources, Coil images, and keyboard/focus. Use when touching @Composable code, recomposition, stability, LazyColumn, animation, shimmer or skeleton, accessibility, theme, colors, Res.string, Coil, focus, or keyboard. Do NOT use for MVI, error tiers, or module graph (compose-architecture), ViewModel or data work (compose-feature, compose-data), Gradle or module work (compose-project), or expect/actual splits (compose-platform).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 语义字效｜短语物理逐级升级到整句锁定 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 机械语义字场变体｜成年角色让齿轮、弹簧与倒带成为文字 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。