4,592 件 ・ 関連度順
Gate a prompt universe for schema and provenance completeness, target or campaign contamination, evidence entailment, naturalness, one-concept clarity, architecture consistency, aided status, answer leakage, and semantic duplicates. Use after realistic prompt generation and before human panel selection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recover source-bound buyer jobs, struggling moments, desired progress, forces, workarounds, information acts, journey states, criteria, constraints, roles, locales, and authentic language. Use on approved ICP hypotheses plus customer, search, review, forum, procurement, support, or public-market evidence before designing an AI-visibility prompt architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn an approved measurement charter, ICPs, and buyer jobs into a budget-aware prompt coverage blueprint across proximity bands, aided status, information acts, journey states, roles, locales, evidence grades, partitions, and measurement lanes. Use before prompt wording to define required, optional, and prohibited canonical intent cells.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing how one canonical agent core runs across Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and AGENTS.md-compatible tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user types /prompts:hep-build or /agentlas-build, mentions @Hephaestus for build work, asks to create a single Agentlas agent, create a multi-agent team, or package an existing local/external agent into Agentlas architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing how one canonical agent core runs across Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cursor, and AGENTS.md-compatible tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when converting, repairing, or packaging an existing local or external agent/team into Agentlas architecture for local install, Agentlas import, Codex plugin use, Claude adapter use, or open-source release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a single Agentlas agent, creating a multi-agent team, or packaging an existing local/external agent into Agentlas architecture. Make sure to use this for /meta-agent requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authoring skill for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) supporting capture, from-planner-handoff, and adopt-template entry modes with selectable Y-Statement or MADR v4.0.0 output templates, supersession lineage, and ASR trigger evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experiment design reference for problem-class framing, Minimum Viable Experiment coaching, hypothesis formation, vetting and red flags, and experiment readiness. Use when translating a stated business outcome into candidate data-science problem classes, or when framing, vetting, scoping, or evaluating an experiment of any kind, including data feasibility, architecture, LLM, performance, use-case, UX, prototyping, and hardware experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /scope to turn a product idea into a living, coarse scope in docs/scope/ and keep it current: plan a new product, plan the next slice, enroll one named feature, or run with no argument to reconcile after shipping and queue what is next. Seeds WHAT to build; /architect designs, /develop builds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run /develop to build a feature, UI or backend, from an approved design, a page, component, API, service, or data slice. If something load bearing is undecided and no spec records it, it stops and routes you to /architect; otherwise it reads the spec plus AGENTS.md, builds, and advances the scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kotlin Multiplatform structure and language traps: module splits, expect/actual, Koin and ViewModel scoping, layers, version catalogs, erased overloads, Char and string-resource formatting limits. Use when shaping modules or DI, when a format specifier renders verbatim, or code misbehaves on one platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finds existing residential floor plans online and checks layout, entrance orientation, and source identity. Use for 找户型图、按楼栋房号找原图、核对同款或镜像户型. Not for designing, generating, or certifying architectural drawings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gated checklist to choose or review a library, framework, storage, data format, model, build-vs-buy or architecture. Run favorites-search before external research when installed. Compare candidates and trade-offs; select within authorization or return user-owned choices. Use for 用哪个 / 选什么框架 / 要不要自建 / A 还是 B / 这个方案行不行 and before committing to one. Research reports → deep-research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces the reader-facing HTML artifact — report, dashboard, architecture view, data browser, or review workbench — evidence-backed, browser-verified. Use when the deliverable IS a visual HTML report, or the user asks for an HTML/web presentation. Load data-visualization-discipline for chart judgment. Not for chat status or Markdown prose unless asked to become a report; not for PowerPoint (deck-creator Route C).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up a repo or project so an AI coding agent works well in it — the CLAUDE.md, the context, the guardrails, and the conventions the agent needs to be useful instead of lost. Use when asked how do I set up CLAUDE.md, configure my repo for Claude Code, my AI agent keeps getting my project wrong, or onboard an AI agent to my codebase. Produces a structured CLAUDE.md/project-context file (architecture, conventions, commands, do-nots), the right level of detail (enough to orient, not a novel), the guardrails that keep the agent safe (what not to touch, how to test), and a maintenance habit so it stays current — turning a repo an agent flails in into one it navigates like a teammate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Present a design to a client so they can make a decision rather than react to a picture — the brief restated, the moves explained against it, the options with their trade-offs, and a specific decision requested. Use when asked to present a design to a client, prepare a design review meeting, present concept options, or when a client keeps changing their mind after sign-off. Produces the presentation structure, the brief-to-design traceability, the options with honest trade-offs, the cost and programme position, and the decision record that makes sign-off stick.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a specification section that a contractor can price accurately and a site can build from — performance stated, products defined, workmanship and tolerances given, and the coordination with the drawings made explicit. Use when asked to write a specification, spec a material or system, prepare an NBS-style section, or when a specification produced wildly different tender prices. Produces the scope and interface definition, the performance requirements, the product or system definition, execution and tolerance requirements, and the submittals and testing schedule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes codebases to understand structure, tech stack, patterns, and conventions. Use when onboarding to a new project, exploring unfamiliar code, or when asked "how does this work?" or "what's the architecture?"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。