5,899 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the rule set is over the Augment budget, when a new rule would breach it, or when asked to audit / merge / prune rules — runs the audit pipeline and proposes a verdict per rule.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit — vulnerability scan, pentest review, attack-surface sweep; explicit request only, not regular feature work. Pre-implementation threat pass → threat-modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when shaping an engineering hiring loop — stages, take-home vs live, calibration, bar-raiser, signal-vs-noise audit. Triggers on 'design our interview loop', 'audit our hiring bar'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use BEFORE writing or editing any non-trivial UI — inventories components, design tokens, shadcn primitives, and reusable patterns into state.ui_audit. Hard gate for fe-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When running discovery interviews — question-bank build, bias audit, insight extraction. Triggers on 'audit my guide', 'extract insights from transcript', 'is my hypothesis falsifiable'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit how a brand is currently expressed across touchpoints and flag drift from its defined tokens, voice, and strategy. Use to inventory and critique an existing brand before changing it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Documentation] Use to author, audit, amend, or test-spec a business Feature Spec. The single spec skill — modes draft|init|update|audit|amend create/maintain the tech-free 8-section Feature Spec; draft authors a provisional spec from an idea/requirement (no code yet, Evidence: TBD); tests generates Section 8 TC-{FEATURE}-{NNN} test specifications; sync reconciles §8 TCs ↔ executing test code. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,tests,sync}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Workflow] Use when activating the Architecture Audit workflow to review the whole project's architecture, run an architecture health check, or check production readiness/scalability in one pass — read-only, produces one consolidated Architecture Health Report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo", "generate proposal", or after completing a GEO audit for a prospect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific optimization, schema markup, technical SEO, content quality (E-E-A-T), and client-ready GEO report generation. Use when user says "geo", "seo", "audit", "AI search", "AI visibility", "optimize", "citability", "llms.txt", "schema", "brand mentions", "GEO report", or any URL for analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a professional PDF report from a GEO audit using pandoc plus a Chrome/Chromium-compatible headless browser. Converts GEO-AUDIT-REPORT.md into a styled, client-ready PDF with a cover page, color-coded score tables, severity-tagged findings, and a 90-day roadmap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a phase-gated refactoring or redesign loop - session-blind workers map and trace the area, empirical probes precede the design, an approval gate guards implementation, and a conformance audit re-checks the branch after any design change. State persists in .episteme/DESIGN-<slug>.md. Requires the refactor agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: refactor loop, redesign, design gate, enumerate before design, conformance audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-audit code changes to identify side effects, regression risks, and unhandled edge cases before merging or deploying. Use after a change is complete and before merging to a shared branch, before deploying a hotfix, after complex multi-module refactoring, or when a previous review may have missed side effects in async, state-mutating, or security-sensitive code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an existing agent skill or instruction file for lines that do not change behavior, routing overlap, and portability, or vet a third-party skill before installing it. To create or edit a skill, use the platform's skill-creator instead. Not for running a skill's own task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditar e melhorar a acessibilidade web seguindo as diretrizes WCAG 2.1. Use quando solicitado para "melhorar acessibilidade", "auditoria a11y", "conformidade WCAG", "suporte a leitor de tela", "navegação por teclado" ou "tornar acessível".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Especialista em acessibilidade web para conformidade WCAG, implementação ARIA e design inclusivo. Use ao auditar sites para problemas de acessibilidade, implementar padrões WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA, testar com leitores de tela ou garantir conformidade ADA. Especialista em HTML semântico, navegação por teclado e compatibilidade com tecnologia assistiva.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quando o usuário quer criar páginas otimizadas para SEO em escala usando templates e dados. Também use quando o usuário menciona "SEO programático", "páginas de template", "páginas em escala", "páginas de diretório", "páginas de localização", "páginas de [palavra-chave] + [cidade]", "páginas de comparação", "páginas de integração" ou "construir muitas páginas para SEO". Para auditar problemas de SEO existentes, veja seo-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit live URLs using Playwright and Axe combined with WCAG skills
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and safely clean local project repositories or workspaces with excessive generated files, old project residue, dirty Git status, stale worktrees, build caches, duplicate nested projects, confusing roots, or agent context/token waste. Use when the user asks to organize a repo, remove useless files, classify valid project files, clean untracked/deleted files, reduce disk usage, migrate from an old repo layout to a canonical project, or prepare a repository for future Codex/agent work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing or fixing prose that reads like a leaked reasoning transcript — dead design-session citations such as (decision N), audit item codes, or §N of uncommitted drafts; change narration such as "used to", "no longer", "this cut"; stack or review vantage ("a later PR in this stack", "rejected in review"); reviewer-addressed justifications; control-flow narration; or hedged planning residue in comments, JSDoc, docs, or Agent Notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, moving, reviewing, or auditing documentation in the deepseek-harness repo — choosing hierarchy and detail, separating tutorials from references, checking tutorial progression, trimming doc slop, responding to a verify-doc-budgets failure, or requests like "improve the docs", "audit the docs", "where should this be documented", or "this doc is too long".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。