2,638 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Builds reusable malware configuration extractors by applying a declarative JSON spec (offsets, decode layers, field definitions) to a sample to produce structured, defanged config. Activates for requests to build a config extractor, write a reusable family config parser, or run a spec-driven configuration extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bypasses anti-VM and sandbox checks during analysis by locating the specific detection routines (artifact strings, timing, CPUID/hypervisor bit) and planning patches or environment hardening so the sample detonates. Activates for requests to bypass anti-VM checks, defeat sandbox detection, or make an evasive sample run for analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuilds a usable PE file from a memory dump by fixing the section alignment (virtual-to-raw), correcting the entry point, and preparing for import table reconstruction. Activates for requests to rebuild a dumped PE, fix a memory-dumped executable, or convert a process dump into an analyzable file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses x64dbg to dynamically debug Windows malware: setting strategic breakpoints on APIs, stepping through unpacking and decryption, dumping memory at the right moment, and manipulating execution to reach hidden code. Activates for requests to debug malware with x64dbg, set API breakpoints, or step through unpacking in a debugger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Python-based malware packaged as PyInstaller/py2exe executables by detecting the packer, locating the embedded archive, and identifying bundled .pyc modules for extraction and decompilation. Activates for requests to analyze compiled Python malware, unpack a PyInstaller binary, or extract pyc modules from a frozen Python executable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract an Allium specification from an existing codebase. Use when the user has existing code and wants to distil behaviour into a spec, reverse engineer a specification from implementation, generate a spec from code, turn implementation into a behavioural specification, or document what a codebase does in Allium terms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design clean, graphics-first technical presentations and posters with logical slide progression, visual hierarchy, purposeful motion, and complementary speaker notes. Use for research talks, conference slides, seminars, defenses, posters, or figure-focused presentations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provide constructive, evidence-based research mentoring feedback on student manuscripts, proposals, analyses, code, figures, and presentations. Use for advisor-style review that teaches the next improvement without impersonating an advisor or making unsupported scientific judgments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
工程/执行原则录入器。当用户发现系统应遵守某条原则（工程约束/AI行为规范），自动分类原则类型、写入正确执行层、审计当前违规点、生成修复追踪。区别于 cognitive-extract-principle（后者处理郑总的思维方式原则）。触发词：「立一个原则」「记下这个原则」「这是条工程原则」「以后所有X都要Y」「把这条原则记在相关文档里」「这应该是工程原则」。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the release team: coordinates release-manager, qa-lead, devops-engineer, and producer to execute a release from candidate to deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when absorbing ideas, capabilities, workflows, architecture, quality systems, ecosystem extensions, or engineering practices from any reference system into the current project through original, project-native redesign rather than copying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author, validate, test, and deploy YARA-L 2.0 detection rules and evaluate end-to-end detection coverage gaps in Google SecOps. Use when writing new detection rules, tuning existing rules, validating syntax, testing logic against historical telemetry, or evaluating detection coverage against threat intelligence blogs, CVE disclosures, and Threat Detection Opportunities (TDOs) using synthetic UDM events and long-running coverage analysis. Don't use for alert triage (use secops-triage), deep forensic event reconstruction on infected hosts (use secops-investigate), or case management operations (use secops-cases).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for proactive threat hunting in Google SecOps. Use when proactively hunting for threats, retroactively analyzing indicators of compromise (IoCs), performing prevalence searches across enterprise events, hunting for MITRE ATT&CK techniques, or detecting behavioral and statistical outliers using UDM queries. Don't use for incoming alert triage (use secops-triage), active incident response and timeline deep-dives on a known breach (use secops-investigate), or detection rule authoring (use secops-detection-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for deep security incident and entity investigations in Google SecOps. Use when investigating cases, analyzing entities (hosts, IPs, domains, hashes, users), extracting and searching UDM events, performing asset and user timeline analysis, and detecting lateral movement across enterprise networks. Don't use for detection rule authoring or YARA-L tuning (use secops-detection-engineering), proactive hypothesis-driven hunting (use secops-hunt), initial alert triage (use secops-triage), or basic case status updates (use secops-cases).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate for product specifications before stakeholder review. Use this skill when: - A spec draft is ready and you want to validate it before sending to Engineering, Design, and QA - You want to check a spec against your template's completeness rules - You need to catch vague language, missing sections, or gaps before review - You want a pass/fail scorecard with specific fix suggestions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate ship-ready release notes from specs and tickets. Use this skill when: - A release is being prepared and you need user-facing release notes - You need internal (engineering) release notes for a deployment - You want to generate release notes from completed specs or tickets
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an empowered team brief. Use when the user says "team brief", "product brief", "give the team a problem", "empowered team", "how do I brief engineering", "delegate to the team", "product mission", or wants to give a team clear goals without dictating the solution - even if they don't say "team brief".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and write QA test artifacts - test cases, test plans, acceptance criteria, API test specs, and PR testability reviews. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer or SDET needs to translate requirements, user stories, or feature specs into structured test documentation. Trigger on phrases like "write test cases", "create a test plan", "define acceptance criteria", "review this PR for testability", "write API test specs", "test coverage for this feature", "what should we test", "how do we test this", or any request to structure what and how to test before execution begins. Also trigger when a developer asks "is this testable?" or a PM asks "what are the edge cases?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit feature specs against India's Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act. Use this skill when: - Writing or reviewing any feature that handles user data (especially children's data) - Auditing a spec's Personal Information section for completeness - Checking a feature against DPDP Act 2023 requirements - Preparing compliance documentation before engineering review - Verifying masking, retention, and consent policies are defined for all PII
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。