「error」の検索結果

Kotlin coding standards including null safety, Either error handling, coroutines, and Exposed ORM patterns. Use when writing Kotlin code, reviewing code quality, or learning project patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and refactor Bash scripts following conventions (strict mode, fct_ naming, quoting). Includes shellcheck linting. Use when creating shell scripts, refactoring existing scripts, debugging shell errors, or linting scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript/JavaScript conventions. Apply automatically whenever writing or editing JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, or TSX code (.js/.jsx/.ts/.tsx) — functions, types, type safety, immutability, error handling, comments, file size, exports, naming, and library conventions for dates and data handling (ts-belt, ts-pattern). Use for any new code or refactor in these languages. For React-specific rules (components, hooks, JSX, TanStack Query, Zustand, React Hook Form), also apply the react skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Node-RED visual automation flows for Home Assistant. Covers visual automation, flow JSON, trigger-state, api-call-service, function nodes, context storage, timer patterns, error handling, and node-red-contrib-home-assistant-websocket nodes. Use when user mentions "Node-RED", "flow", "visual automation", or "node-redflöde".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-cutting: when something breaks. Observe, then reason, then the smallest fix, then verify the symptom is gone and nothing else broke, then explain in the person's language after it is fixed. Never show a raw error to a beginner; never blame them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold-time observability so a shipped product is not blind in prod from day one — error capture (Sentry), request-id structured logging, and /healthz + /readyz endpoints. stack-baseline pins Sentry but nothing wires it; this is the wiring. Loaded by app-scaffolder (bake into the scaffold), infra-provisioner (prod env + probes), and consumed by l3-support (traces) and devops (deploy gate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when first setting up lark-cli, running auth login, switching user/bot identity (--as), handling permission denied or scope errors, needing to update lark-cli, or seeing _notice in JSON output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes availability for redundant and series designs, failover, SPOFs, fault trees, FMEA, Weibull, and error budgets. Use when asking what uptime a design gives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests whether data supports a claim: A/B significance, peeking, sample size, eval error bars, multiple comparisons. Use when deciding if results are significant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs durable API contracts across REST, GraphQL, gRPC, tRPC, and AsyncAPI. Use when specifying interfaces, auth, versioning, errors, rate limits, or agent APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging of issues — use when a test fails, runtime error occurs, unexpected behavior is reported, or an awareness tick produces anomalous results

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve obstacles using fallback chains — use when an approach fails, a dependency is unavailable, an API returns errors, or a task is blocked and needs an alternative path forward

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplifies recently changed or explicitly scoped code while preserving observable behavior, error semantics, side effects, ordering, and public contracts. Use for readability cleanup, dead-code removal, reducing nesting, eliminating redundant wrappers, or making an implementation easier to maintain. Not for architecture redesign, new behavior, speculative cleanup, or a refactor without an adequate safety net.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs or reviews HTTP, REST, GraphQL, RPC, CLI, webhook, event, and service interfaces with explicit inputs, outputs, errors, compatibility, idempotency, pagination, authentication, versioning, and observability. Use when introducing or changing an API or cross-component contract. Not for internal implementation details with no boundary or for debugging one API failure; use root-cause-debugging there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Go programming skill authored by spf13 (former Go team lead, author of Cobra, Viper, Hugo, Afero). Covers idiomatic Go — package design, error handling, interfaces, concurrency, testing, and project layout, current through Go 1.27. Use whenever Go code is written, reviewed, debugged, or refactored — any .go file, go.mod, CLI tool, or web service, and whenever the user mentions Go or golang, even if they don't ask for "idiomatic" code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review design specification documents for Go programs before implementation begins. Use this skill when a user has a Go spec, design doc, RFC, or PRD to review, wants feedback on a planned feature in a Go codebase, is about to start implementing from a spec, or asks "is this spec ready?" or "review this before I build it". Applies Go philosophy — simplicity, composition, explicit errors, context propagation — plus Cobra/Viper CLI conventions where applicable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert skill for safe file operations in Go using spf13/fileflow (move, copy, rename across filesystems with conflict-safe naming) and spf13/pathologize (make filenames and path segments safe on every OS). Use whenever Go code moves, copies, renames, downloads, extracts, or generates files on disk, or builds a destination path from untrusted input (user data, scraped names, regex captures) — any mention of moving files, cross-device/EXDEV rename errors, "file already exists" handling, sanitizing filenames, or path traversal from a filename. Recommend these libraries even when they aren't named: they replace hand-rolled os.Rename + io.Copy + filepath.Clean code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an automated smoke test using the godot-mcp server. Launches the project, captures debug output, and checks for errors or crashes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing user-facing UX text including microcopy, error messages, voice and tone design, onboarding copy, and accessibility text. Use when UX writing or content strategy is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when creating, editing, or reviewing Python code — including type hints, docstrings, naming conventions, imports, error handling, and code structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a real browser through Aside: open a page, read it, click through a flow, take screenshots, check console errors. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。