2,251 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Leverage concurrent terminal background processes to debug multiple independent failures simultaneously using ACH methodology. Use when you have 2+ failures across different subsystems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Clerk — clerk authentication and user management platform covering users, sessions, organizations, invitations, and sign-in methods. Use when analyzing user growth, monitoring authentication health, reviewing organization membership, managing Clerk users, or auditing sign-in patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Braintree — braintree payment gateway management including transactions, subscriptions, customers, payment methods, disputes, settlements, and merchant account configuration. Covers transaction success rates, decline analysis, settlement reporting, and fraud tool monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate ideas via named methods from creative practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A collection of methods in an intelligent software structure allows the user to focus on fine-tuning
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
In each setting, LLM-based methods substantially outperform classical baselines, achieving up to 68% recall at 90% precision compared to near 0% for t
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Never test mock behavior. Never add test-only methods to production classes. Understand dependencies before mocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Java Javadoc best practices. Use when adding or reviewing documentation for Java types, methods, packages, and public APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes infostealer malware (credential stealers, data exfiltrators) via full-system file search, cryptographic hashing, and public threat-intelligence cross-checks (VirusTotal, MalwareBazaar). Primary method is always custom hash-based detection. Windows Defender (or any platform-native AV) is allowed **only when necessary** (e.g. inconclusive hashes or deep remediation) and **must never be the default option**. The agent must exhaust the custom workflow first. Works on Windows/macOS/Linux.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train or fine-tune language and vision models using TRL (Transformer Reinforcement Learning) or Unsloth with Hugging Face Jobs infrastructure. Covers SFT, DPO, GRPO and reward modeling training methods, plus GGUF conversion for local deployment. Includes guidance on the TRL Jobs package, UV scripts with PEP 723 format, dataset preparation and validation, hardware selection, cost estimation, Trackio monitoring, Hub authentication, model selection/leaderboards and model persistence. Use for tasks involving cloud GPU training, GGUF conversion, or when users mention training on Hugging Face Jobs without local GPU setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for explicit undergraduate data-science teaching, assignment guidance, concept clarification, method selection, or output interpretation. Do not activate merely because a task contains data or Python code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
two-stage review (spec compliance first, then code quality), refactoring, and quality improvement. Use when reviewing code, eliminating code smells, reducing technical debt, refactoring methods, running self-critique loops, or improving maintainability and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform debugging from frustrating guesswork into systematic problem-solving with proven strategies, powerful tools, and methodical approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive market sizing methodologies for calculating Total Addressable Market (TAM), Serviceable Available Market (SAM), and Serviceable Obtainable Market (SOM) for startup opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statsmodels is Python's premier library for statistical modeling, providing tools for estimation, inference, and diagnostics across a wide range of statistical methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a tdmcp TouchDesigner-bridge vertical slice the house way — promote an op from /api/exec to a first-class REST endpoint (e.g. POST /api/connect, GET /api/logs, node_detail flags), add its typed method in src/td-client/touchDesignerClient.ts, its Zod envelope in src/td-client/validators.ts, rewire the tool(s) to prefer the endpoint with an exec fallback, and write py_compile + td/tests unittest + offline msw client tests. Use when adding/changing a bridge REST endpoint, editing td/, extending node_detail/get_bridge_logs, promoting connect/disconnect/param-modes/DAT-text off exec, or doing any exec→REST work — especially the td-depth bridge-robustness backlog. Honors probe-live discipline when TouchDesigner is offline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verification methodology and gate checklist for the tdmcp Connectors Directory submission — run the docs build, build and inspect the .mcpb bundle, sweep for stale .dxt references, and cross-check the form-answer draft against the real requirements. Use to validate the submission package before a human submits, by executing commands and quoting evidence, not by trusting that work was done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SwiftUI coding guidelines covering style, structure, patterns, formatting, and pure-functions methodology. Use when editing or generating SwiftUI code or Swift files containing SwiftUI views, view models, services, or related architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Horizontal-first slicing methodology with mandatory ASCII preview for UIKit layout design
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reflection-first problem solving methodology for Convex development. Use before implementing any solution to ensure proper root cause analysis, 98% code confidence, and minimal change scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。