「scope」の検索結果

Validates permission inheritance between parent and child agents. Ensures child permissions are equal to or more restrictive than parent. Activate on 'validate permissions', 'permission check', 'inheritance validation', 'permission matrix', 'security validation'. NOT for runtime enforcement (use dag-scope-enforcer) or isolation management (use dag-isolation-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when wrangler deploys silently fail or produce wrong artifacts, secrets upload as empty strings, custom domain DNS is not resolving, route assignment broke after rename, observability/tail logs are needed, D1/KV/R2 bindings are missing, OAuth scope errors block a command, cookies on a redirect are not attaching, or the worker exceeds CPU time. Triggers: "Tenant or user not found", "Authentication error" on wrangler d1 push, secret length is 0 after upload, route returns origin not worker, "compatibility_date too old", 1101 errors, custom_domain assignment lost on script rename. NOT for AWS Lambda / Vercel Edge / Deno Deploy (different runtimes), Cloudflare Zero Trust, or R2-specific tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety, privacy, cost management, and frank advice for building always-on AI agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy risk surfaces, runaway cost prevention, scope creep, psychological effects of persistent AI companions, and responsible deployment patterns. This is the skill that tells you what can go wrong and how to prevent it. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 7 — Mechanical cleanup pass over the branch diff, followed by a `code-structure` review pass and a `verify` re-stamp. Shadows the global `simplify` skill at project scope; the cleanup pass is performed inline rather than via Skill self-call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit write_set, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by `/tdd` Step 3 and by `/swarm-dispatch` workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline and a 5-iteration RALPH loop. No scope expansion, no design decisions, no test edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 11 — Commit Preparation and Execution. Stages and commits the work. Requires `/grant-commit` first (Git Commit Guard enforces a 15-min ad-hoc consent window; inside a workflow the grant is slug-scoped and one grant covers the whole landing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a small requested change focused when optional refactors, architectural redesign, or unrelated cleanup threaten to expand its scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a git commit with Medox conventions (co-author, conventional type/scope). Invoke manually with /commit — do NOT trigger automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for prioritization, or when there are more tasks than capacity: "what should we do first?", "rank this backlog", "cut scope for the MVP", "RICE score these". Picks a method (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, impact-effort), scores items and sets a cut line. Skip for choosing between two designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Breaks work into ordered tasks. Use when you have a spec or clear requirements and need to break work into implementable tasks. Use when a task feels too large to start, when you need to estimate scope, or when parallel work is possible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rename a code symbol (variable, function, class) across a specified scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: you need strict context boundaries in chat (Telegram/Discord/Slack/etc.) and want to prevent topic bleed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level astrophysics covering stellar physics, galaxy formation, high-energy astrophysics, observational techniques, and the electromagnetic spectrum across wavelengths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level radio astronomy covering radio telescopes, interferometry, VLBI, pulsars, spectral line observations, fast radio bursts, and aperture synthesis imaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up kpopper watch for background branch compatibility, scoped shared facts, and daily review. Use when asked to watch a project's graph, check worktree changes against main, share external observations, or install a kpopper routine. Ordinary followup capture recommends scheduling without enabling it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map existing materials into a first knowledge record, or investigate a subject's history in depth. Use whenever the user asks to map, survey, go through, reconstruct or investigate what already exists - folders of documents, decision records, meeting notes, emails, exports, code - or wants a starting record built from existing materials, even when the word 'record' is never said: consult this before listing or reading the files yourself, because a map has an agreed scope, a protocol and a report. Also, once, at a suitable moment, to offer the starting choices where a workspace has no record and the work is clearly ongoing - never on a greeting. Learning while working needs no map. Requests come in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package completed data analysis and ML work so an independent recipient can reproduce the claimed results, verify artifact lineage, and operate the handoff within its stated scope. Use when finalizing a project, study, model package, or review bundle; not for deploying to a live system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether a feature request fits the existing codebase — check for duplicates, contradictions, scope creep, and architectural misfit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with feature flags — Laravel Pennant, gradual rollouts, A/B testing, scope-based flags — even when the user just says 'hide this behind a flag' without naming Pennant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Eloquent models, relationships, scopes, or queries via Model:: — 'fetch users with their orders'. NOT for PHPStan output, non-Eloquent services, or raw SQL questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing authorization end-to-end — route → gate → policy → query scope → response filter — before changes to permissions, tenants, ownership, or admin flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。