「verification」の検索結果

Independent, traceable code review of one SDD Composy task in review_required against its approved PRD, stories, TechSpec, evidence, and project rules, with stable findings and severities. Use when a task passed QA and evidence — 'revisar a TASK-003', 'code review da task', 'review this task's diff'. Do NOT use for code review outside an SDD workspace (use the host code review), for QA (sdd-qa), or for verification (sdd-verify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, provider-neutral SDD Composy correction loop on one approved task (EXECUTE, QA, EVIDENCE, REVIEW, VERIFY; at most 3 iterations) with explicit approval, safe-stop guards, and fresh verification. Use to continue an approved TASK autonomously — 'rodar o loop na TASK-003', 'continuar a task até passar', 'start a loop on task 4'. Do NOT use for the host's recurring loop runner, for fleets (sdd-fleet), or for a task without human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of one SDD Composy task in verify_required: reproduce every claim with fresh commands, build the truth table, refute stale evidence, and produce the verdict that gates complete. Use when review is done and the task claims to be finished — 'verificar a TASK-003', 'a task está pronta mesmo?', 'is this task really complete'. Do NOT use for QA, code review, or a general 'verify my work' outside an SDD task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, and when a finished feature needs adversarial verification before integration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliver a small, bounded code change through inspection, a mini-plan, implementation, testing, review, and adversarial verification. Use for bug fixes, configuration changes, and features expected to touch no more than five files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute approved PWDEV Flow plans one atomic task at a time with test-first implementation, fresh verification, blocker handling, and durable evidence. Use after the plan gate is approved or for approved Flow correction tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an approved PWDEV Flow specification into dependency-aware waves and atomic executable tasks. Use when design is approved and the user needs exact file scope, test-first actions, verification commands, and an execution gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "see-so", "see so", "security review", "security check", "vulnerability scan", "run security".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with public-doc citations and cloud-specific MCP verification plans. Use for conceptual questions such as `statfileslevel`, filter rules, URL decomposition, cache invalidation behavior, rewrite behavior, and security headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize performance of the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration for AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with cloud-specific baseline and runtime verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform security audits for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and Apache HTTPD in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with cloud-specific hardening verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - creates isolated git worktrees with smart directory selection and safety verification

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author pull requests with intent-separated commits, blast-radius disclosure, and verification evidence. Load when opening a PR, writing a PR description, separating refactor from feature commits, or summarizing a change set for review. Also triggers on "write the PR", "PR body", "intent-separated commits", "split refactor from feature", "pr summary", or after safe-change cycles complete. Extends git-workflow-and-versioning — does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the smallest, highest-signal context package for an AI coding task — goal, constraints, repo facts, boundaries, and a verification plan. Load when prompts are underspecified, the agent is missing key files or decisions, the user says "use the right context", "here's the repo", or when work is drifting due to missing constraints. Also triggers on "context engineering", "gather context", "what do you need from me", "before you start". Not for cross-session continuity (use memory-startup/memory-recall).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test and debug browser UIs using Chrome DevTools MCP — DOM inspection, console errors, network requests, performance traces, and visual verification. Load when building or debugging anything that renders in a browser, verifying a UI fix, profiling Core Web Vitals in a real page, or the user asks for browser testing with DevTools. Requires chrome-devtools MCP configured. Not for backend-only or CLI work. Pairs with frontend-design and performance-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix broken or failing functionality through structured reproduction, root-cause analysis, minimal fix, and verification. Load when the user asks to fix a bug, debug an error, resolve an issue, or work on a Linear ticket. Also triggers on "this is broken", "fix this bug", "why is this failing", "debug this", "resolve this error", "what went wrong", or any request to diagnose and fix a problem.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Required reference for Prisma ORM 7 SQL driver adapter work. Use when implementing or modifying adapters, adding database drivers, or touching SqlDriverAdapter, Transaction, savepoint, result mapping, or DriverAdapterError behavior. Covers current transaction lifecycle, optional savepoint hooks, original database-error preservation, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run large codebase migrations and multi-file refactors. Uses the Composio CLI to coordinate issue tracking, batched PRs, and CI verification while the agent executes the transforms locally across hundreds of files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure Key Vault Keys SDK for .NET. Client library for managing cryptographic keys in Azure Key Vault and Managed HSM. Use for key creation, rotation, encryption, decryption, signing, and verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment, and acceptance verification with minimal human re-intervention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download large datasets from NCBI efficiently using EPost, history server, batching, rate limiting, and retry logic. Use when bulk-fetching tens of thousands of sequences, pulling all results of a large ESearch, designing reproducible pipelines, comparing E-utilities to NCBI Datasets v2 CLI, or implementing checksum-validated downloads. Encodes WebEnv TTL (~8h), EPost 200-ID limit, retmax caps, parallelization design, and integrity verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download genome assemblies, gene records, and ortholog data from NCBI using the modern Datasets v2 CLI (replaces assembly_summary.txt scraping and many EFetch workflows). Use when bulk-pulling genome assemblies, gene metadata across species, ortholog sets, or BLAST databases; when E-utilities are too slow for genome-scale work; or when automatic checksum verification, parallel download, and clean accession-driven retrieval are required. Encodes the JSON-lines output format, dataformat conversion, --dehydrated for cloud workflows, and when Datasets is/isn't the right tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。