2,235 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
- Geolocate and chronolocate a photo or video from visual evidence alone — plate and phone number formats, road markings, utility poles, bollards, signage typefaces, architecture and vegetation for… Use when asked where or when a picture was taken, to verify a claimed location without GPS or EXIF, or to match a scene against Google Earth, Street View, Yandex Panoramas, Mapillary or KartaView
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Onboard a new machine as a receive-only follower on a multi-machine agent network: it reads the shared vault, canon, skills and memory, runs nothing heavy locally (no RAG, reindex or GPU), and never receives executable hooks from the hub. Checklist-driven, with a verify step at each stage. Triggers: "/follower-onboard <machine>".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Build a sourced, corroborated profile of a named individual from public records, social platforms, professional networks, court and property filings, licensing boards, patents, papers and obituaries — anchoring the name to a… Use when asked to find, identify, background-check or profile a person, verify someone's claimed employment or credentials, or locate a missing or hard-to-reach individual
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- Find leaked or mentioned selectors circulating in pastes, leak forums, Telegram channels and dump markets, and judge whether a claimed leak is genuine or a recycled combolist. Use when checking whether a name, email, domain or credential is circulating, verifying a breach claim made against your organisation, or setting up ongoing leak monitoring
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish an already-vetted post to a personal Facebook wall through the owner's real logged-in Chrome tab (a low-ban-risk path), rate-limit-guarded and draft-first: paste, verify what is actually in the composer, confirm after reload. Triggers: "/fb-post", "publish to facebook", "post this to my wall".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remote-sensing literature search, citation verification, sensor/platform/dataset query strategy, citation file management (.ris/.bib/.enw conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, DOI/arXiv lookup) across CrossRef, arXiv, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Semantic Scholar, and domain web sources. Use when the user needs coordinated multi-step literature workflows for remote sensing, Earth observation, geospatial AI, GIScience, photogrammetry, SAR, hyperspectral imaging, LiDAR, satellite missions, benchmark datasets, land-cover mapping, change detection, object detection, segmentation, retrieval, or multimodal remote-sensing foundation models. Also trigger on general literature-search needs during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as searching for papers/literature, doing a literature review, verifying a citation, converting citation files, and Chinese phrasings like 文献检索、查文献、找文献、 文献综述检索、查论文、引文核对、参考文献管理、文献去重.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational guide for integrating the NV oOS Complete purchase flow (vendor checkout API client) into standalone WordPress plugins — docs-hub 0.5.3 (stack added in PR #6963, shipped 0.5.2 → 0.5.3) and nvoos-content-graph 1.0.10 (live). Covers the vendor API contract (session/verify/health, nvoos-oos-complete product, 424/502 error passthrough), the five-class client stack (config, vendor client, license store, installer, REST controller), the purchase-modal JS/CSS port recipe (class-prefix rename, keep-the-JS-identical trick), wp.org commerce compliance (External Services disclosure, WPORG-REVIEW-COMMERCE-NOTES.md, js.stripe.com service exception), and the checkout test conventions (direct controller calls, pi_ fixture rules, zero-HTTP assertions). Use when adding the Get NV oOS Complete upsell/checkout to a plugin, porting the commerce stack to a new standalone plugin, extending the purchase flow, or debugging a checkout integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agentic design-to-build pipeline that turns a Figma design into a built WordPress site using the Figma MCP server (read side) and the Elementor MCP server (write side) attached as MCP Apps on an NV oOS assistant. Covers the 7-stage pipeline (Scope → Read → Plan → Tokenize → Build → Verify → Handoff), the normative stage rules (get_design_context first, tokenize before build, drafts only, never publish, Figma read-only), the build-manifest contract (schema + example in reference/build-manifest.md), the design-file contract (frame/section/variable naming in reference/design-file-contract.md), assistant wiring (figma + elementor MCP Apps, OAuth + application passwords, host allowlist), safety rules, and troubleshooting. Use when asked to build or create a site, page, or landing page from a Figma design, to wire Figma MCP or Elementor MCP for design-to-build work, to approve or produce a build manifest, or to debug a failed design-to-build run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
reqordデータの整合性・品質・実装充足を横断的に検証する。req/spec/contextのバリデーションからspec実装のSC充足チェック、トレーサビリティ可視化、完了処理までをカバーする。
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and evaluate influencers for brand partnerships, verify authenticity, and track collaboration performance across Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing an A/B or split test: define the hypothesis, control and variants, estimate sample size, verify tracking, and predeclare metrics and stopping rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers di
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "pre-launch check the landing page", "run a Quality-Score preflight", or "verify ad-to-page message match before launch"; produces an ad↔page continuity report — message-match gaps, above-the-fold check, page-speed read, form-friction count, mobile-render flags — as a pass/fix punch list. Not for redesigning or rewriting the page — use landing-optimizer; not for scoring the account or the RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 落地页体验预检/广告落地页一致性检查
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect missing validation plans (how to verify the design is correct) in design documents and ADRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep, iterative internet research for current facts, source triangulation, contradiction checks, due diligence, competitive analysis, claim verification, "latest" lookups, and cited reports. Use when the user asks to browse, search, research the web, verify claims, compare sources, gather primary sources, investigate companies, people, products, technical topics, news, events, markets, or create AKBP-ready durable research evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Self-verification loop. After completing a task, re-read the original request, list each requirement, verify whether it was met, and fix gaps before stopping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check task processing statistics to see how much data and how many docs are moving. Use when checking throughput, diagnosing a stalled task, verifying data movement, or reporting on task activity. Use when user says "is data flowing", "how much data", "check throughput", "how many documents", "task not processing", "data not arriving", "stats", "bytes processed", "stalled capture", "no data in destination", "data volume", "task report", "usage report", or "how much data did we process".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。