「decision」の検索結果

Self-hosted semantic memory for AI agents via MCP. Save worklogs, decisions, and notes, then recall them across sessions by meaning, not keyword. Postgres + pgvector with auto-tagging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates detailed technical specifications for software projects covering requirements, architecture, APIs, and testing strategies. Use when planning features, documenting system design, or creating architecture decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult external AIs (Gemini 2.5 Pro, OpenAI Codex, Claude) for second opinions. Use for debugging failures, architectural decisions, security validation, or need fresh perspective with synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate 7-phase feature development with specialized agents (code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer). Use for multi-file features, architectural decisions, or encountering ambiguous requirements, integration patterns, design approach errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for writing secure, reliable, and performant Claude Code hooks - validates design decisions, enforces best practices, and prevents common pitfalls. Use when creating, reviewing, or debugging Claude Code hooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when preparing for, running, or closing a live meeting with an AI assistant dashboard. Triggers on "meeting copilot", "live copilot", "prepare for a call", "update copilot", "close the session", or requests to turn transcript chunks into meeting questions, topic maps, decisions, and follow-ups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when needing strategic project analysis from multiple independent expert perspectives. Triggers on business decisions, growth strategy, product direction, competitive analysis, or any situation where diverse C-level opinions reduce blind spots

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate iterative visual style searches with branch prompts, decision graphs, feedback loops, and final direction selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a precise, step-by-step action plan before making any code changes. Use this skill whenever the user describes a feature, bug fix, refactor, or any multi-file change. Also use when the user says "plan", "think through", "what would it take", or describes a problem without jumping to code. TRIGGER BEFORE writing any code for non-trivial changes. Do not skip planning for changes that touch more than one file or involve architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-neutral deep-research orchestration for brainstorming, technology choices, comparisons, and state-of-the-art surveys. The Research Lead makes scope and decision calls while native subagents scout, search, verify, synthesize, audit, write, and commit every research artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to run or continue an autonomous build: turn a goal into an approved plan, dispatch implementation and review agents, and finish with one pull request. The Lead is a provider-neutral orchestrator that makes decisions but never writes code, edits files, runs commands, or reviews its own work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task may benefit from a bounded subagent for implementation, large-codebase discovery at task start, independent review, requested or pre-commit code simplification, or expert work on complex decisions, modeling, automation, or repeated failures. The main agent chooses whether to delegate and accepts the result. Do not use for simple questions or short work with no meaningful review or delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualize and map user flows with Mermaid diagrams, decision points, error states, and conversion metrics to optimize user journeys. Use when the user requests user flow mapping or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transcribe meeting audio with speaker diarization, generate structured summaries with action items, decisions, and follow-ups, and support multiple audio formats and languages. Use when the user requests meeting transcription or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze datasets to answer defined questions through statistical methods, trend identification, hypothesis testing, and correlation analysis. Use when the user needs evidence-backed findings or decisions from data; use exploratory-data-analysis instead for open-ended first-pass profiling before questions are defined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress selected context to a target token budget while preserving decisions, evidence, constraints, and unresolved questions. Use when relevant material is already selected but too long; use context-optimization when selection, deduplication, and ordering are also required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform systematic exploratory data analysis to understand dataset structure, distributions, relationships, and anomalies before modeling. Use when a dataset is new, its quality is unknown, or the user requests open-ended profiling; use data-analysis instead for a defined hypothesis or decision question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Metrology Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metrology Scientist judgment. Reason from SI traceability, GUM uncertainty budgets, and VIM distinctions between calibration and verification; propagates Type A/B components, CIPM MRA equivalence, and ILAC decision rules before any pass/fail claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。