「team」の検索結果

Phase 2 of the SRS workflow. Reads projects/{slug}/brainstorm.md and writes a comprehensive spec.md. No word limit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions, validate web functionality, or perform any browser-based testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate ready-to-paste AI image-gen prompts for 2D game art (character/sprite, icon/UI/item, background/tileset) that stay consistent with the project's art style across separate chat sessions in Claude/Gemini/ChatGPT chat UIs. Use when the user wants to render, generate, or create game art/sprites/icons/backgrounds with AI, or mentions an "art style bible" for a game project. Maintains a persistent `art-style-bible.md` so style doesn't drift between requests, and gives a post-generation checklist plus post-processing guidance for common technical misses (transparency, size, aspect ratio).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 8 of the SRS workflow. Generates an improvement report covering deferred features, technical risks, validation warnings, and next-version candidates. No word limit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 8 of the SRS workflow. Generates an improvement report covering deferred features, technical risks, validation warnings, and next-version candidates. No word limit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 6 of the SRS workflow. Reads approved plan files and generates a complete IEEE 830-compliant SRS — one file per section, no word limit. A full SRS may span 300+ pages across all files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the SRS workflow. User gives a project topic → AI runs a deep, categorized brainstorm (5 mandatory rounds) to fully understand actors, features, scope boundary, tech constraints, and business rules before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 9 of the SRS workflow. Saves all project context to _context/ files so future Claude sessions can resume without re-reading the full SRS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 7 of the SRS workflow. Runs srs_validator.py --dir on the generated SRS files, reports errors and warnings, auto-fixes ERRORs, and outputs a COMPLIANT / PARTIALLY COMPLIANT / NON-COMPLIANT verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths hidden at normal scales

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 4 of the SRS workflow. Reads spec.md and writes one detailed plan file per SRS section (§1–§3 + Appendices). Each file is a complete blueprint for the corresponding SRS section. No word limit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent senior-engineering quality auditor — architecture, ownership, domain integrity, abstraction, and maintainability. Use as `--gate` inside the ck:cook pipeline (blocks a phase on BLOCKER/HIGH/current-change MEDIUM findings) or call directly with `--audit`, `--diff`, `--changed` on any repository, directory, or file. Never writes tests and never edits production code — it returns structured findings only; ck:cook or ck:fix apply the fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Always use this skill before claiming any work is done, fixed, passing, or complete — even if it seems obvious. Also use when receiving code review feedback from any source (human or automated), when finishing a task or major feature, before committing or creating a PR, or when about to express satisfaction with work. Covers three practices: receiving feedback with technical rigor (no performative agreement), triggering code review via /code-review command or cook/fix pipelines, and verification gates (run the command, read the output, then make the claim). Never skip — the cost of false completion claims is higher than the cost of verifying. References: code-review-reception.md, requesting-code-review.md, verification-before-completion.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An Agentforce agent is moving from build or sandbox to live end-user traffic and the team needs a comprehensive readiness gate: coverage testing, Trust Layer config, guardrails, cost telemetry, observability, rate limits, permissions, rollout strategy, rollback plan, performance benchmarks. Triggers: 'we want to ship our Agentforce agent next week', 'pre-prod readiness review for our Service Agent', 'what do we need before turning the agent on for real customers', 'agent went live and is hallucinating, what should we have caught', 'cost monitoring for our internal sales agent', 'rollout strategy from internal pilot to GA'. NOT for the lighter five-block activation sign-off artifact — use agentforce/agent-deployment-checklist. NOT for authoring the guardrails themselves — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for building the test harness — use agentforce/agentforce-eval-harness. NOT for Trust Layer feature setup in isolation — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when configuring Health Cloud referral management: setting up ClinicalServiceRequest-based referrals, provider search, referral status workflows, and network management. NOT for referrals in Financial Services Cloud — use admin/fsc-referral-management. NOT for care team workflow and transition-of-care design — use admin/care-coordination-requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, auditing, or simplifying Record Types and Page Layouts. Triggers: 'record type', 'page layout', 'different picklist values', 'different fields per team', 'dynamic forms', 'business process', 'recordTypeVisibilities', 'layoutAssignments', 'record type deploy failed', 'businessProcess required', 'layout assignment matrix'. NOT for layout explosion across many profiles — use admin/record-type-strategy-at-scale. NOT for sharing rules — use admin/sharing-and-visibility. NOT for FLS — use admin/permission-sets-vs-profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when defining patient engagement portal requirements for Health Cloud: appointment scheduling, secure in-portal messaging, health assessments, patient education, and self-service features. NOT for care team workflows, SDOH barriers and care gaps — use admin/care-coordination-requirements. NOT for patient portal licensing and cloud topology — use architect/health-cloud-multi-cloud-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configuring and running Pipeline Inspection in Sales Cloud: enabling the feature, mapping forecast categories into the inspection view, Days in Stage and other deal-change metrics, and pipeline review cadence for sales managers. Use when designing or improving how a team monitors deal health and pipeline movement. NOT for the Revenue Intelligence app, Einstein deal insights, or forecast-accuracy dashboards — use admin/revenue-intelligence-setup. NOT for forecast types, quotas, or forecast hierarchy setup — use admin/collaborative-forecasts. Keywords: pipeline review, coverage ratio, stage conversion, slippage, stale deals, days in stage, LastStageChangeInDays, LastStageChangeDate, AgeInDays, PushCount, ForecastCategoryName, enablePipelineInspection, PipelineInspMetricConfig, OpportunitySettings, review cadence, commit call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。