「issues」の検索結果

Scan agent skills for security issues before adoption. Detects prompt injection, malicious code, excessive permissions, secret exposure, and supply chain risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Code skills against the agentskills specification. Catches structural, semantic, and naming issues before users do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs architectural code reviews focusing on design patterns, duplication, circular dependencies, and refactoring impact. Is the design consistent with the codebase? Use when reviewing code changes for architectural concerns, code smells, or structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or writing LLM, RAG, MCP, tool, or agent code for OWASP-aligned security issues; triggered by "owasp my code", "owasp this PR", AI security review, PR review, or changes to AI system code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ship the day's work in one repo: triage new issues, review every open PR (description, visual recap, adversarial reviewer, shipping pre-flight and quality gate), merge only after GO, then post a status recap. Use for "ship it", "ship day", "merge the ready PRs", "end of work block".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a security sweep over one repo: secrets, dependencies and the diff, a security review and a silent-failure hunt, one deduped and ranked findings report, issues filed for blocking findings only after GO, each one handed to pb-bug-fix. Use for "security sweep", "audit this repo", "check for leaked secrets and vulnerable deps".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive performance optimization guide for React and Next.js applications, maintained by Vercel. Use when writing new React components or Next.js pages, implementing data fetching (client or server-side), or reviewing code for performance issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles, categorise, verify, and write agent-ready briefs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive design guide for web and mobile applications. Use when designing new UI components or pages, choosing color palettes and typography, or reviewing code for UX issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and audit SEO issues affecting crawlability, indexation, rankings, and organic performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the `gh` CLI for issues, pull requests, Actions runs, and GitHub API queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Linear issues, projects, and teams

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debugging specialist for errors, test failures, and unexpected behavior. Use proactively when encountering any issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on any Java or JVM project: plain Java, libraries, CLI tools, Maven/Gradle builds, Spring Boot, Jakarta EE, MyBatis/MyBatis-Plus, JPA/Hibernate, Lombok, Java tests, Java code review, API design, exception handling, security review, refactoring, dependencies, Java version upgrades, javax/jakarta migrations, or JVM runtime troubleshooting such as GC, OOM, thread dumps, deadlocks, high CPU, and performance issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit UIKit-based screens for accessibility issues with concrete VoiceOver and Dynamic Type fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to analyze, respond to, or improve their app reviews and ratings. Also use when the user mentions "reviews", "ratings", "negative reviews", "how to get more reviews", "review response", or "my rating is dropping". For broader ASO audit, see aso-audit. For retention issues causing bad reviews, see retention-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to reduce churn, improve user engagement, or increase lifetime value. Also use when the user mentions "retention", "churn", "users leaving", "engagement", "DAU/MAU", "user activation", or "why are users uninstalling". For onboarding-specific issues, see app-launch. For monetization, see monetization-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core Swift development workflows for Xcode and Swift tooling, including project setup, dependency management, concurrency guidance, language/runtime best practices, and troubleshooting build or package resolution issues. Use when working on Swift tasks across a codebase, especially package/tooling/runtime work and cross-cutting Swift conventions (mutation semantics, naming, enum/file rules, import hygiene), including in SwiftUI projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance. Use when diagnosing slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU, memory usage, excessive view updates, layout thrash, body evaluation cost, identity churn, view lifetime issues, lazy loading, Instruments profiling guidance, and performance audit requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and optimize React component performance issues (slow renders, re-render thrash, laggy lists, expensive computations). Use when asked to profile or improve a React component, reduce re-renders, or speed up UI updates in React apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a git diff or explicit file scope for reuse, code quality, efficiency, clarity, and standards issues, then optionally apply safe Codex-driven fixes. Use when the user asks to "simplify code", "review changed code", "check for code reuse", "review code quality", "review efficiency", "simplify changes", "clean up code", "refactor changes", or "run simplify".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a comprehensive 20-point code quality audit on a "vibe-coded" codebase that was shipped fast and now needs hardening. Use this skill whenever the user mentions vibe coding, vibe audit, code audit, code review, code cleanup, hardening a prototype, productionizing a codebase, technical debt cleanup, or asks Claude to "audit my code", "review my codebase", "clean up my project", or check a freshly-shipped project for common quality issues. Also use when a user shares a repo and asks what's wrong with it or how to make it production-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。