「loop」の検索結果

Run one bounded adversarial pass when the user explicitly requests a report-style stress test or ROSE identifies a concrete material loophole in an existing strategy, spec, plan, review, or claim; do not trigger for an interactive grill/frontier interview or merely before write-back, implementation, reconciliation, or completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design patterns for building autonomous coding agents. Covers tool integration, permission systems, browser automation, and human-in-the-loop workflows. Use when building AI agents, designing tool APIs, implementing permission systems, or creating autonomous coding assistants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) authentication for React SPAs with MSAL.js and Cloudflare Workers JWT validation using jose library. Full-stack pattern with Authorization Code Flow + PKCE. Prevents 8 documented errors. Use when: implementing Microsoft SSO, troubleshooting AADSTS50058 loops, AADSTS700084 refresh token errors, React Router redirects, setActiveAccount re-render issues, or validating Entra ID tokens in Workers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make your AI agent learn and improve automatically. Reviews sessions, extracts learnings, updates memory files, and compounds knowledge over time. Set up nightly review loops that make your agent smarter every day.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete community building, engagement, and monetization system. From zero to thriving community — launch strategy, member engagement loops, content programming, moderation frameworks, growth tactics, monetization models, and health metrics. Works for Discord, Slack, Telegram, Circle, forums, or any platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Human-in-the-loop CAPTCHA solving with two modes: screenshot (default, zero infrastructure) and token relay (requires network access). Screenshot mode captures the page with a grid overlay, sends it to the human, and injects clicks based on their reply. Token relay mode detects CAPTCHA type + sitekey, serves the real widget on a relay page for native solving, and injects the token via CDP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehension questions and language exercises based on the analyzed content to create a complete learning loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ScepticAgent internal architecture reference. Use whenever the user asks how the extension works, wants to add a new AI provider, add a new highlight category, debug communication between components, understand the agent loop or streaming, or work with provider routing and the Gemini CORS proxy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build production-grade AI agents from scratch using patterns inspired by production-grade agentic systems like Claude Code. Covers two audiences — (1) workflow builders who need planner+executor pipelines, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and multi-agent orchestration, and (2) application embedders who need HTTP/SSE APIs, multi-user session management, and React frontend integration. Use when asked to build an AI agent, create a coding assistant, embed an agent in an app, build an API agent, clone Claude Code, build a CLI agent, design an agent architecture, scaffold an agentic system, or automate a multi-step workflow. Triggers on keywords like agent builder, agent blueprint, coding assistant, CLI agent, agentic tool, claude code clone, agent scaffold, agent architecture, workflow automation, multi-agent, planner executor, SSE streaming, agent API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when `hogli ci:insights` or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a flaky job, when asked to check Trunk Flaky Tests for a test, PR, or master, or when asked to deflake, stabilize, or fix a flaky Jest, pytest, or Playwright test. Core discipline: reproduce locally before changing anything, fix the root cause (never mask it with sleeps, retries, or bigger timeouts), and prove the fix with an N-run validation loop sized to the observed failure rate. Stabilizing is not the only valid outcome — the skill also gates whether the test should exist, so deleting a test that catches nothing real, or re-leveling one that flakes because of the level it runs at, are first-class endings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。