5,147 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Builds and maintains the leveling framework and pay structure — level definitions, salary bands, benchmarking, pay equity, and how raises and promotions are decided. Use this to design or revise leveling, set or adjust salary bands, benchmark against market, handle a compensation request or counteroffer, run a review cycle, or diagnose pay compression and equity issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs servers and corporate systems — patching, configuration baselines, change control, capacity, and the routine that prevents incidents. Use this to establish a patching cadence, standardize server configuration, plan a maintenance window, decide change control for infrastructure, or clean up systems that have drifted from any known state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies, assesses, and tracks organizational risk — building and maintaining a risk register, scoring exposure, assigning owners and treatments, and preparing for audit. Use this to stand up a risk program, assess the risk in a decision or initiative, prepare for a certification or audit, decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, transferred, or avoided, or report risk posture to leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Administers the email, chat, meeting and file-sharing platform the organization runs on — tenant and domain configuration, mail authentication and routing, phishing and spam controls, shared mailboxes and distribution groups, external sharing and guest access, permission sprawl in file storage, and retention and legal hold. Use this to configure a tenant, tighten sharing, investigate a mail delivery or phishing problem, or work out who can see a file and why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintains the corporate record and the governance machinery — entity records, board and committee support, resolutions and minutes, delegations of authority, insurance, and business continuity. Use this to prepare board or committee materials, record a decision that needs to be minuted, set or check approval authority, review insurance and continuity coverage, establish a retention policy, or work out where a responsibility belongs when it falls between functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds the help center, in-product guidance, and knowledge base that let customers resolve problems without contacting anyone — content, findability, maintenance, and deflection measurement. Use this to build or fix a help center, reduce support volume, write documentation for customers, improve findability, or decide what deserves a help article versus a product fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing and maintaining lat.md documentation files — structured markdown that describes a project's architecture, design decisions, and test specs. Use when creating, editing, or reviewing files in the lat.md/ directory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update user profile information when user shares preferences, habits, or work details. When you need to save user preferences, remember user's work domain, or provide personalized service.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Feishu/Lark CLI - official open-source CLI tool from Feishu for AI Agents. Provides 200+ commands across 12 business domains: IM, Docs, Sheets, Base (Bitable), Calendar, Video Meeting, Mail, Tasks, Wiki, Drive, Contacts, Search. Supports both user identity and bot identity authentication. Use when user wants to operate Feishu/Lark resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, security, and maintainability. Supports local git diffs (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). Use when the user asks to review code, check a PR, audit changes, or wants feedback on code quality before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Idiomatic Go patterns, best practices, and conventions for building robust, efficient, and maintainable Go applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Swift 6.2 易用的并发（Approachable Concurrency）—— 默认单线程，使用 @concurrent 进行显式后台卸载，针对主执行角色（Main Actor）类型的隔离一致性。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Land a change everywhere the same fact is stated — enumerating the full surface inventory (landing copy, docs, machine-readable summaries, changelog badges repeated across every page, sitemap, README, descriptions embedded in code, and untyped frontend consumers of typed responses), generating a surface instead of restating it, drift tests where you cannot generate, never hand-maintaining a copy of a surface another codebase owns, shipping a paired PR when you change a format a different codebase decodes, and keeping overloaded product words apart. Use when adding or renaming a user-facing feature, editing product/marketing copy or docs, renaming a serialized response field, changing a serialization or share-link format, wiring one repo's output into another's checks, or reviewing a PR that touched only one place a fact appears.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make the build step a real gate on what you actually distribute — build scripts that warn and exit 0 on a missing input, size checks with only an upper bound, hand-maintained file lists that drift from the entrypoints they must cover, committed bundles that go stale when only the source changes, GNU-only shell in release scripts that aborts on the other OS, and verification that runs against the source tree instead of the artifact. Use when writing or reviewing a build/package script, a `dist/` copy step, a release workflow that uploads a zip or installer, or a committed compiled asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Python library releases including semantic versioning, changelog maintenance (Keep a Changelog format), release automation with GitHub Actions, and deprecation workflows. Use when planning releases, writing changelogs, automating release pipelines, or communicating breaking changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when converting medical text between academic and patient-friendly tones, translating medical jargon for patients, adapting research papers for public audiences, or rewriting clinical notes for patient handouts. Maintains medical accuracy while adjusting readability level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete FAERS-style pharmacovigilance disproportionality research designs from a user-provided drug class, comparator strategy, adverse-event domain, and patient-group stratification. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a spontaneous-report safety signal study using FAERS or a similar pharmacovigilance database, especially when the article logic includes product selection, indication-group stratification, MedDRA-based adverse-event extraction, serious-case filtering, suspect-drug and concomitant-exclusion logic, reporting odds ratio analysis, comparator-drug benchmarking, cross-drug comparison, and cautious signal interpretation without causal overclaiming. Covers five study patterns (single-drug disproportionality workflow, multi-drug class comparison workflow, indication-stratified workflow, comparator-controlled signal screening workflow...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Precision editing tool that reduces abstract word count through intelligent compression techniques, maintaining scientific rigor while meeting strict journal and conference requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. Always map what is biologically supported, what is druggable, what has actually advanced, and what remains strategically open. Never confuse target relevance with druggability, preclinical activity with clinical promise, or narrative excitement with validated development maturity. Never fabricate references, trial status, approval status, company activity, or asset metadata.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates complete bidirectional multi-phenotype Mendelian randomization research designs from a user-provided exposure family and outcome family. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a genome-wide causal-inference study based on publicly available GWAS summary statistics, especially when the article logic includes multiple exposures, multiple outcomes or subtypes, bidirectional MR, IV filtering, IVW as the main estimator, weighted median / MR-Egger / MR-PRESSO sensitivity analyses, leave-one-out testing, heterogeneity / pleiotropy checks, and multiple-testing control with FDR. Covers five study patterns (single-family bidirectional MR, multi-phenotype screening MR, subtype-resolved MR, phenome-style bidirectional causal map, mechanism-prioritized MR follow-up) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps whether a biomedical research topic, subtopic, or study angle is truly saturated, superficially crowded, strategically occupied, or still open for differentiated entry. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a hot medical research direction is already overworked, whether meaningful whitespace remains, whether major groups have already occupied the obvious claims, and whether the timing window is still open. Always distinguish popularity from true saturation, and distinguish cosmetic novelty from meaningful differentiating entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a paper figure by figure before re-integrating the full narrative, so the user can identify the core findings quickly and check whether each visual actually supports the authors' main claims. Always separate figure content, figure-linked claim, evidentiary strength, and unsupported interpretation. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, figure content, panel labels, result values, or study details that were not actually provided.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Emulated Vercel REST API for local development and testing. Use when the user needs to interact with Vercel API endpoints locally, test Vercel integrations, emulate projects/deployments/domains, set up Vercel OAuth flows, manage environment variables, create API keys, configure protection bypass, emulate Vercel Blob storage, or test without hitting the real Vercel API. Triggers include "Vercel API", "emulate Vercel", "mock Vercel", "test Vercel OAuth", "Vercel integration", "Vercel Blob", "local Vercel", or any task requiring a local Vercel API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。