Autonomous multi-step investigation — deep research carried end-to-end without per-step approval; explicit request only, never for normal feature work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,643 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Autonomous multi-step investigation — deep research carried end-to-end without per-step approval; explicit request only, never for normal feature work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordination guidance for the narrow case of multiple desktop-backed agents active concurrently in the same desktop-backed coordination context. Use ONLY when two or more desktop peers are running at the same time; normal CLI agents and single desktop peers should ignore this skill. Read this BEFORE concurrent desktop-to-desktop handoffs to keep sender labels unique, identity routing cooperative, and material handoffs proven.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Especialista em construir experiências imersivas baseadas em scroll - storytelling por paralaxe, animações de scroll, narrativas interativas e experiências web cinematográficas. Como as interativas do NY Times, páginas de produtos da Apple e experiências web premiadas. Torna websites em experiências, não apenas páginas. Use quando: animação de scroll, paralaxe, storytelling de scroll, história interativa, website cinematográfico.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orquestração de treinamento distribuído em clusters. Escala PyTorch/TensorFlow/HuggingFace do laptop para milhares de nós. Ajuste de hiperparâmetros integrado com Ray Tune, tolerância a falhas, escalabilidade elástica. Use ao treinar modelos massivos em múltiplas máquinas ou executar varreduras distribuídas de hiperparâmetros.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Processamento escalável de dados para workloads de ML. Execução em streaming em CPU/GPU, suporta Parquet/CSV/JSON/imagens. Integra-se com Ray Train, PyTorch, TensorFlow. Escala de uma única máquina para centenas de nós. Use para inferência em lote, pré-processamento de dados, carregamento de dados multi-modal ou pipelines distribuídos de ETL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill before implementing a fix for a barrier that may originate in a shared component, design system, renderer, or external dependency rather than this project's own code. Decide whether the responsible fix is local, an existing installed capability, or an upstream contribution before writing a workaround. Absolutely always record any temporary local divergence with an owner and removal condition. Under no circumstances open, comment on, or submit anything in an external project without explicit human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this skill whenever you are filing, reviewing, or generating accessibility bug reports — whether from automated tool output, manual testing, user reports, or testing with disabled people. The purpose of this skill is to make accessibility findings easier to report accurately, connect them to real people and tasks, and let developers reproduce, understand, and fix them without unnecessary back-and-forth. Absolutely always describe the barrier and its task impact before citing a WCAG criterion. Under no circumstances guess a disability diagnosis, treat automated tool output as a conformance conclusion, or expose secrets/personal data in a report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Fix & Debug] Use when you need to investigate and explain how existing features or logic work. Flag: --mode=explain produces a one-way developer-narrative explanation (Purpose → How → Why → Impact) tuned by coding level; use /understand for the standalone prompt-driven explainer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Steward public stories about any work — creation ethics, application ethics, and maintenance of the story plus its disclosures (generated, drafted, curated, authored). Use when writing a public article, origin story, talk, README narrative, or showcase about how work was made; when publishing ethics and decisions; or when asked who generated vs curated a text. Do not use for ADRs, FAQs, skill citations, or marketing hype.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Examine a plan, decision, belief, or problem through question rounds that explore assumptions, alternatives, and consequences before acting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when audio already placed in a HyperFrames composition needs to be mixed: fade-in/fade-out, crossfade, track gain or volume, volume automation, ducking, a music bed that fights a voiceover (voiceover carve), effects on a track (EQ, compressor, limiter, gate, saturation, delay, reverb, chorus, phaser, bitcrush), automation envelopes drawn on a track's volume or any effect parameter, or one submix bus carrying a chain, a fader and an automation clock for several tracks at once (`<hf-audio-group>`). Don't use for sourcing or generating audio — finding BGM, SFX, or making a voiceover is `/media-use`. Don't use for clip timing or track layout, which is `/hyperframes-core`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 4 Turn 1 of disease-market-sizing-orchestration. Generates report HTML with mandatory citation anchors per fact claim. Reads contract + staging + sources/. Every drug/treatment/stat/recommendation MUST carry [pmid:.../guideline:.../nct:...] anchor that resolves to an actual file in sources/. NEVER hardcode drug names or numerical claims. Use AFTER evidence recall (phase 3), BEFORE content-verification-layer (Turn 2).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-disease market sizing entry skill. Triggered by user one-liner like "做 X 市场调研" or "Run market sizing for X". Auto-runs 5 phase pipeline: contract → stratify → recall → compose-audit → bundle. Hard-gates on Cite-or-Block: every fact claim must carry citation anchor verifiable against sources/. Resumable mid-run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author or edit a custom HyperFrames composition when no specialized workflow fits, or when BRIEF.md sets flow: companion. Use for longer or multi-scene pieces, brand and sizzle reels, montages, static loops, static title cards, footage remixes, and freeform builds. Use motion-graphics instead for a short unnarrated motion-first unit, including an animated title. Route fresh creation through hyperframes before using this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when audio already placed in a HyperFrames composition needs to be mixed: fade-in/fade-out, crossfade, track gain or volume, volume automation, ducking, a music bed that fights a voiceover (voiceover carve), effects on a track (EQ, compressor, limiter, gate, saturation, delay, reverb, chorus, phaser, bitcrush), automation envelopes drawn on a track's volume or any effect parameter, or one submix bus carrying a chain, a fader and an automation clock for several tracks at once (the `hf-audio-group` element). Don't use for sourcing or generating audio — finding BGM, SFX, or making a voiceover is `/media-use`. Don't use for clip timing or track layout, which is `/hyperframes-core`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Non-animation creative direction for HyperFrames videos. Use for design spec (frame.md / design.md) handling, palettes, typography, narration, beat planning, audio-reactive visuals, composition patterns, and brand / style decisions. For atomic motion patterns and scene blueprints, use `hyperframes-animation`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when editing Chinese web fiction, narrative prose, or story drafts that sound AI-generated, overly polished, formulaic, explanatory, or too symmetrical; use to detect AI-writing fingerprints and revise only wording while preserving plot, facts, characters, names, and intent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex adapter for Garry Tan's full gstack methodology across CEO/product pressure, CTO architecture, design, engineering, QA, security, shipping, documentation, and retrospectives. Use when the 总控/CEO or 架构/CTO role needs gstack method routing, implementation-plan hardening, or the user says gstack should help a role.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose the narrowest reliable browser surface across Codex Browser, signed-in Chrome, Playwright CLI, and platform scripts. Use for browser automation, logged-in workflows, UI inspection, screenshots, form filling, publish previews, or frontend QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack office-hours method for early product ideas, startup demand checks, builder-mode brainstorming, narrow wedge selection, and pre-architecture clarification before plan review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack QA method for web/UI behavior verification and narrow fix loops when the user explicitly allows QA to repair issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。