Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
2,638 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, deploy, and operate production AI agent systems — single agents, multi-agent teams, and autonomous swarms. Complete methodology from agent architecture through orchestration, memory systems, safety guardrails, and operational excellence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
, it might predict the next word as
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score a repository's agentic legibility from repo-visible evidence only. Use when Codex needs to audit how easy a codebase is for coding agents to discover, bootstrap, validate, and navigate, especially for harness-engineering reviews, developer-experience audits, repo cleanup, or before/after comparisons after improving docs, tooling, or architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
基于「AI工程造价+法律知识库」(1394人订阅,3149个内容)的造价+法律交叉领域AI技能。当用户需要进行工程造价司法鉴定、合同风险审查、变更索赔分析、结算纠纷诊断时使用。触发词包括但不限于:造价+法律、工程司法鉴证、合同风控、变更索赔、结算纠纷、鉴定意见、证据链、工期索赔、费用索赔。也适用于用户需要基于知识库内容进行案件分析、模拟鉴定、风险预警的场景。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA a change by driving the running dev app like a real QA engineer - start the server and a real browser session, write a checklist from the agreed requirements and the diff, execute every item with evidence, then go looking for anything that looks off even where the diff did not touch. Reports findings by severity and separates regressions from pre-existing problems. Use after a change is implemented and the gates pass, when the user asks to "QA this", "test it in the app", or "check it actually works".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate implementation to Codex or to a sandboxed Claude Code (`claude -p`), have a model from the other vendor review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex or a sandboxed Claude to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks for a cross-vendor review of delegated code, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, or architecting Rust code — systems programming, async services, CLI tooling, web backends, or any work in `.rs` files. Triggers on editing `.rs` or `Cargo.toml` files, or mentions of "Rust", "Tokio", "Axum", "cargo", "borrow checker", "lifetime", "trait object", "async Rust", "crate", "rustc", or explicit requests to "build this in Rust" / "rewrite X in Rust". For adversarial security review of Rust code see security-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building games or interactive software in Godot 4 with C# — designing scenes and nodes, writing gameplay code, handling input, physics, animation, UI, rendering, save systems, performance work, WebSocket-based multiplayer, or exporting to platforms. Triggers on "Godot", "GDScript", "C# Godot", "scene tree", Godot node types (Node2D, Node3D, Control, CharacterBody), "_Process", "_PhysicsProcess", "signal", "autoload", "RPC", "WebSocketMultiplayerPeer", "shader", "export preset", or any Godot 4 project files. For game design see game-systems-designer; for balance see game-balancer; for game-specific intake see game-design-shaper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan and redact PII and sensitive data (emails, phone numbers, SSNs, API keys, IP addresses, credentials, amounts, company/person names) from repository files. Includes a pre-commit hook to block commits containing PII. Use when asked to audit code for sensitive data, sanitize files before publishing, or install PII detection hooks. For application security hardening see security-engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates release preparation for your monorepo — maintaining CHANGELOG and the release assessment document, resolving merge conflicts on release branches, and communicating status, risk, and asks to the broader team. Use when the user mentions release manager, release train, cut a release, release branch, CHANGELOG, release assessment, monorepo release, merge conflicts during release, versioning, or coordinating a version bump with engineering and stakeholders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to structure a vague marketing request into a well-scoped brief before any real work begins. Triggers on "shape this campaign", "plan this launch", "scope this content", "marketing plan", "growth plan", "content strategy", "outbound plan", or when invoked as the /mshape slash command. Produces a filled brief (campaign, content, optimization, research, or pipeline) that downstream marketing skills can act on. Do not use for work already well-defined — go straight to execution. For engineering task shaping see prompt-shaper; for game-design intake see game-design-shaper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-stack security review — auditing vulnerabilities across infrastructure, smart contracts, CI/CD pipelines, and AI agent systems, plus auth/sessions/crypto and validating user input at API and infrastructure boundaries. Triggers on mentions of "vulnerability", "pentest", "OWASP", "access control", "injection", "CSRF", "JWT", "smart contract audit", "supply chain", "OIDC", or any review of security-sensitive code paths spanning more than one layer. For PII sanitization see [security](../security/SKILL.md).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop or review dygo PostgreSQL connectivity, schema planning, additive migration, prune, metadata persistence, Records, transactions, and schema snapshots. Use for framework database behavior and high-risk data lifecycle changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop or review dygo metadata loading, YAML decoding, JSON Schemas, validation, naming, Field types, registries, routes, and persisted metadata contracts. Use for framework-level metadata behavior rather than authoring one Business App Entity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, or review security-sensitive dygo behavior across auth, sessions, Permissions, secrets, APIs, database writes, files, Jobs, and Studio. Use when security boundaries are a primary concern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare, validate, package, or review a dygo framework release and its upgrade path. Use for versioning, tags, binaries, Studio and Core bundling, installers, archives, checksums, and release smoke checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds production-quality UIs. Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces. Use when creating components, implementing layouts, managing state, or when the output needs to look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite AI context engineering specialist mastering dynamic context management, vector databases, knowledge graphs, and intelligent memory systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records decisions and documentation. Use when making architectural decisions, changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, refactoring, or automated editing. Uses GPT-5.2 by default for state-of-the-art software engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。