「implementation」の検索結果

Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Package codebases into LLM-optimized markdown, and run the Deep Think Authority pipeline (context-builder → Deep Think review → structured AUTHORITY → Flash/Antigravity implementation agent). Use when generating project context, preparing Deep Think reviews, or binding a weaker coding agent to a senior reasoning pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map user journeys, onboarding paths, entry points, first actions, trust points, accessibility risks, and SEO/LLM handoffs for public websites without redesigning the visual system. Use this skill when the user asks how new readers, returning users, project reviewers, community members, buyers, or AI agents should move through a site and what each page must make clear before layout implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Kimi a read-only free-form question about the current repository. Use for prose explanations, flow tracing, module comparisons, or conceptual reasoning where Codex should delegate the answer to local kimi-code rather than perform implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an independent read-only Kimi review over the current working tree or a branch diff. Use when the user wants a second reviewer for defects, regressions, or implementation risks, not edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a bounded write-capable investigation or implementation task to Kimi through the companion runtime. Use only when explicitly invoked or when the user clearly asks to hand off a substantial fix to Kimi.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested output format specifications for Claude prompts. Use when the user wants a specific deliverable structure — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building output formatting. Trigger on: "give me the Executive Brief format," "show me the output template for," "I need the Decision Matrix structure," "show me available output formats," "build a custom output format for." Provides 10 ready-to-use structures (executive briefs, technical designs, research summaries, implementation plans, decision matrices, competitive analyses, post-mortems, stakeholder updates, strategic memos, process documentation) plus a custom template, with per-section length guidance and format constraints tested against Claude formatting defaults. If unsure which format fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or choosing reasoning/identity approaches (use rootnode-block-selection if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate production-ready React/Next.js code from Figma designs. Instructs proper Figma MCP tool usage, component reuse strategies, and variant mapping. **CRITICAL: ALWAYS use this skill when user provides a Figma link or mentions implementing/redesigning from Figma design.** Never attempt manual implementation without invoking this skill first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vets whether to build a feature from scratch, use an existing free/open-source solution, or pay for a third-party API/service. Use this whenever the user asks Claude to implement, add, integrate, or write code for a feature or capability, especially one that sounds like it could already be a solved problem (auth, payments, scraping, animation, comment/DM automation, video/image generation, search, notifications, etc.), even if the user doesn't explicitly ask "should I build or buy this." Make sure to trigger this before writing non-trivial implementation code for any feature-level capability, not just when the user asks about libraries directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes research papers (PDF/arXiv URL) and converts them into executable code. Automatically activated upon requests for paper replication, algorithm implementation, or research reproduction. Responds to requests like "Implement this paper", "paper2code", "Convert paper to code".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route a 50-minute live iOS launch sprint across the lightweight requirements, Claude Design handoff, SwiftUI implementation, landing page, ASO, Simulator screenshot, promo-video, and privacy-scan skills bundled in this plugin. Use as the main entry point when the whole talk workflow should be planned or executed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or review a Claude Design brief and convert its output into a deterministic SwiftUI implementation handoff with native iOS layout, tokens, states, transitions, and accessibility rules. Use for Claude Design mobile prototypes, three-screen iOS concepts, Design-to-Claude-Code handoffs, or when a visual prototype must be buildable without interpretation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test and freeze a tiny iOS MVP in seven minutes using one persona, one explicit devil's-advocate round, scope cuts, and a three-screen flow. Use when an audience supplies an app idea, when requirements must be settled live, or when a concept needs a fast implementation-risk check before Claude Design or Claude Code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a visible, evidence-backed privacy and security report for a local iOS app by scanning permission declarations, network code, dependencies, persistence, and risky APIs, while complementing the official Claude Code security-guidance plugin. Use after implementation, in a live security lane, or before claiming that an app is offline and account-free.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a complete, professional client onboarding package for AI consultants, AI auditors, and solopreneurs working in the AI space (AI strategy, automation, AI readiness audits, implementation, training, etc.). Use this skill whenever a user asks to onboard a new client, set up a client folder, write a welcome email, generate a discovery questionnaire, draft a service agreement, or create a project brief — especially in an AI consulting context. Also trigger when the user says things like "I have a new client", "prepare onboarding docs", "create a client package", or "set up a new project". Produces four ready-to-use deliverables: intake questionnaire, welcome email, service agreement, and project brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Work (MSW) principle through the MSW Kernel to scope, execute, verify, and stop agent work. State the requested outcome and smallest proof, admit a claim only when deleting it would leave the contract unmet or unproven, do and prove each necessary claim, and halt at the fixed point. Use for implementation, debugging, review, research, planning, documentation, or any task where scope control, proportional evidence, or avoiding overwork matters. Also use when the user says MSW, Minimum Sufficient Work, do only what is necessary, avoid over-engineering, or stop when the result is proven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate complex development with AUTOMATIC parallel subagent execution, continuous dispatch scheduling, dependency analysis, file conflict detection, and IOSM quality gates. Analyzes task dependencies, builds critical path, launches parallel background workers with lock management, monitors progress, auto-spawns from discoveries. Use for multi-file features, parallel implementation streams, automated task decomposition, brownfield refactoring, or when user mentions "parallel agents", "orchestrate", "swarm", "continuous dispatch", "automatic scheduling", "PRD", "quality gates", "decompose work", "Mixed/brownfield".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementation is complete, the test suite is green, and an integration decision is needed for a development branch or worktree. Not for failing tests or starting new work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding what an interface should do before UI is built or audited: consequences, action scope, reachable states, naming, and accessibility. Not for visual implementation: use prototype.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or verifying framework-specific code, boilerplate, or a documented, correct implementation. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an implementation has more workarounds than structure and another patch will not pay. Not for in-place re-derivation: use breaking-driven. Not for one-artifact rewrites: use rewrite-clean-v0.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human says "overhaul", "rebuild this subsystem", or "rewrite it from scratch". Not for thin-slice features: use incremental-implementation. Not for root-cause repair: use strike-the-root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a feature begins or specs are checked in: author or update behavioral specs and keep them current with what ships. Not for producing the initial approved spec and plan: use spec-driven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing a multi-file change, building a feature from a breakdown, or writing a large amount of code. Not for a single settled ticket: use work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。