2,246 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates and implements age estimation and verification technologies for online services. Covers facial age estimation, digital ID verification, self-declaration with risk assessment, AI-based age estimation, and the accuracy versus privacy tradeoff. Includes ICO guidance and euCONSENT framework. Keywords: age verification, age estimation, facial analysis, digital ID, children, online safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform 12-Factor Agents compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating agent architecture, reviewing LLM-powered systems, or auditing agentic applications against the 12-Factor methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debate multi-agente: 2-4 perspectivas (PM, Arquiteto, QA, Security) debatem decisao tecnica. Output: decisao + rationale + dissenting opinions → ADR. Inspirado no Party Mode do BMAD-METHOD.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate Joint Commission tracer methodology to assess compliance with accreditation standards across patient care processes and support systems
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Quarkus REST (Jakarta REST) — including resource classes, HTTP methods, status codes, request/response DTOs, Bean Validation, exception mappers, optional runtime OpenAPI exposure (SmallRye), contract-first generation from OpenAPI, content negotiation, pagination, sorting and filtering, API versioning, idempotency (Idempotency-Key), optimistic concurrency (ETag / If-Match), HTTP caching (Cache-Control), API deprecation (Sunset / Deprecation headers), RFC 7807 Problem Details, ISO-8601 for time in contracts, and security-aware boundaries. This should trigger for requests such as Review or improve JAX-RS resources in a Quarkus project; Design HTTP APIs with validation and error handling on Quarkus; Add API versioning, idempotency, ETag concurrency, or deprecation headers; Implement pagination, sorting, or RFC 7807 Problem Details error responses. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to design, review, or improve REST APIs with Spring Boot — including HTTP methods, resource URIs, status codes, DTOs, versioning, deprecation and sunset headers, content negotiation (JSON and vendor media types), ISO-8601 instants in DTOs, pagination/sorting/filtering, Bean Validation at the boundary, idempotency, ETag concurrency, HTTP caching, error handling, security, contract-first OpenAPI (OpenAPI Generator), controller advice, and problem details for errors. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring Boot REST API; Apply best practices for Spring Boot REST API in Java code. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to design, review, or improve security in Spring Boot applications — including SecurityFilterChain, OAuth2/JWT resource server patterns, form login basics, method security (@PreAuthorize), CSRF and CORS for APIs, session fixation, security headers, exception handling, password encoding, and sensitive-data-safe logging. This should trigger for requests such as Add Spring Boot security support; Review Spring Boot security configuration; Improve API authorization in Spring Boot; Add JWT resource server security in Spring Boot; Harden Spring Boot security headers and CSRF settings. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs pegRNAs and nicking guides for prime editing (PE) -- choosing the nick/strand, tuning the primer-binding site (PBS) and reverse-transcription template (RTT) as a per-locus panel, selecting the PE system (PE2/PE3/PE3b/PE4/PE5/PEmax/PE7), adding MMR-evading and PAM-disrupting silent edits, appending epegRNA 3' motifs (tevopreQ1/mpknot), and ranking with PRIDICT/DeepPrime. Covers twinPE/PASTE for large insertions and the prime-vs-base-editing decision. Use when designing a scarless point mutation, small insertion/deletion, or any of the 12 base conversions without a double-strand break, when efficiency is low and MMR inhibition or pegRNA stabilization is needed, or when routing a large insertion to an integrase method. Generic guide scoring and base editing are separate skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts, filters, annotates, and exports differential expression results from DESeq2 or edgeR with proper handling of padj=NA (independent filtering, Cook's outliers, all-zero), multiple-testing correction choice (BH vs Storey q-value vs IHW vs lfsr), TREAT vs post-hoc fold-change filtering, p-value histogram diagnostics, gene annotation via org.db/biomaRt/mygene, GSEA preranked input, ORA background construction, replication reality (Schurch 2016 small-n result), and SABV/sex-stratified reporting. Use when extracting and interpreting DE results, troubleshooting padj=NA, choosing FDR method, preparing ranked lists for pathway analysis, annotating gene IDs, or comparing DESeq2 vs edgeR outputs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes doublets/aggregates from flow, spectral, and mass cytometry before clustering or quantification. Covers FSC-A vs FSC-H singlet discrimination (the Area-Height non-proportionality, not a 1D area gate), FSC-W/SSC width gating, CyTOF Gaussian discrimination parameters (Center/Offset/Width/Residual/Event_length) and DNA intercalator gating, and the residual heterotypic conjugates that survive scatter gating and masquerade as double-positive populations. Use when filtering aggregates before phenotyping, choosing a doublet method for flow vs CyTOF, or diagnosing a suspicious double-positive cluster.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies differential m6A methylation between conditions from MeRIP-seq paired IP/input data using exomePeak2 with `bam_ip` + `bam_input` (control arm) and `bam_treated_ip` + `bam_treated_input` (treatment arm) for integrated GC-bias-aware differential calling (Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), QNB beta-binomial test (Liu 2017 *BMC Bioinformatics* 18:387), MeTDiff HMM-based differential bundled with MeTPeak, RADAR (Zhang 2019 *Genome Biol* 20:294) with its `filterBins -> diffIP -> reportResult` workflow, and the defensible paired-symmetric case of edgeR / DESeq2 on featureCounts-on-peaks matrices when batch / lot covariates need explicit fixed-effect handling (exomePeak2's top-level API does NOT accept arbitrary covariates). Covers paired vs unpaired vs interaction designs, batch confounding (antibody lot, RNA prep, sequencing run) and the per-lot meta-analysis strategy when exomePeak2 is the primary caller, the stoichiometry-vs-expression-vs-IP-efficiency confound that all MeRIP differential methods inherit, normalisation choice (size factor on IP, on input, on per-sample IP/input ratio), the McIntyre 2020 reproducibility caveat, effect-size filtering as a guardrail against under-powered N=2 designs, and orthogonal-validation routes for absolute stoichiometry (GLORI / SAC-seq / m6Anet `mod_ratio`). Use when comparing m6A levels across two or more conditions, choosing between exomePeak2 / QNB / RADAR / MeTDiff for a given design, handling batch confounding when exomePeak2's API is too rigid, normalising against input properly, distinguishing real hyper- / hypo-methylation from expression-level shifts, applying effect-size thresholds, interpreting volcano plots of differential peaks, or planning a follow-up orthogonal stoichiometry validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests genotype-environment associations and identifies adaptive loci while correcting for the four-confound landscape (structure, demography, background selection, sampling design) using LFMM2 with mandatory K via sNMF cross-entropy elbow (LEA 3), BayPass Core/AUX/C2/IS with Omega covariance matrix, RDA / pRDA for polygenic adaptation (Forester 2018; requires imputed genotypes), OutFLANK with trimmed FST null, pcadapt, gradient forests (Ellis-Smith-Pitcher 2012, NOT mis-cited Ellis-Manel), Capblancq & Forester 2021 RDA Swiss-army-knife, genomic-offset prediction with Lind & Lotterhos 2025 three-regime caveat, Lotterhos-Whitlock sampling optima, Wang & Bradburd 2014 IBD vs IBE, and Circuitscape + ResistanceGA. Use when identifying adaptive loci across gradients, choosing K for LFMM2, deciding among GEA methods, predicting maladaptation with the novel-environment caveat, distinguishing IBD vs IBE, or optimizing sampling design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses genetic health of populations for conservation with Ne estimation across time horizons (LDNe NeEstimator V2 option-file API + SNeP physical-linkage correction; recent trajectory via GONE/GONE2; deep history via Stairway Plot 2 / dadi / fastsimcoal2 / PSMC), F-statistics, runs of homozygosity binned by length class to date inbreeding, genetic-load decomposition (Bertorelle 2022 realized vs masked), the modern 100/1000 Ne rule (Frankham 2014), Ne/Nc 2-6 orders of magnitude in marine fish (Hauser & Carvalho 2008), tree-sequence forward simulations (SLiM 4 + pyslim + tskit), and the Sukumaran-Knowles caveat against MSC methods for management-unit definition. Use when estimating Ne by time horizon, detecting inbreeding via F_ROH, decomposing genetic load, justifying conservation thresholds, distinguishing ESU/MU/DPS, configuring NeEstimator V2, or correcting LDNe physical linkage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce and interpret PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and PHATE plots for high-dimensional omics data with rigor about which method preserves what (variance, local structure, manifold, transitions), hyperparameter sensitivity, and the well-documented limits of 2D embeddings. Covers PCA biplot/scree/loadings, t-SNE PCA initialization (Kobak-Berens 2019), UMAP n_neighbors/min_dist trade-offs, and the Chari-Pachter 2023 critique. Use when visualizing high-dimensional data — bulk PCA, single-cell embeddings, multi-omics integration projections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and analyzes pooled prime-editor (PE) screens for installing precise genetic variants without bystander confounding. Covers pegRNA design with PRIDICT and PRIDICT2 (Mathis 2023/2024) for predicting per-pegRNA editing efficiency, pegRNA architecture (spacer + scaffold + PBS + RTT), PE2 / PE3 / PE3b / PEmax / PEAR variants, MOSAIC in situ saturation mutagenesis (Hsu JY et al 2024 bioRxiv), the PRIME pooled-screen methodology (Erwood/Doman 2023 Nat Biotechnol 41:885; ~3,699 ClinVar variant screens), chromatin context as a primary determinant of PE efficiency, scaffold-incorporation and indel byproduct quantification with CRISPResso2, and the cross-modal validation strategy of PE + base-editor screens for variant function. Use when designing a pegRNA library for variant installation, choosing between BE and PE for a specific edit, predicting pegRNA efficiency before library synthesis, analyzing PE screen output, distinguishing intended-edit from scaffold-incorporation, or scaling PE screens to thousands of variants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes pooled CRISPR screens with MAGeCK (Li et al 2014), covering count generation (mageck count), the RRA two-condition workflow (mageck test using alpha-RRA over per-sgRNA negative-binomial p-values), the MLE multi-condition workflow (mageck mle with explicit design matrix and beta-score output), normalization choice (median vs total vs control-sgRNA vs spike-in), sgRNA efficiency injection, paired-sample testing, time-course design, drug-screen versus dropout-screen design matrices, MAGeCKFlute and MAGeCK-VISPR downstream visualization, and decision logic for when to use MAGeCK vs JACKS / BAGEL2 / drugZ / Chronos. Use when running a fresh CRISPR screen analysis, picking RRA vs MLE for the experimental design, choosing a normalization method from QC signatures, debugging MLE convergence failure or NaN beta scores, comparing MAGeCK output across tools, or building a batch-aware multi-cell-line / multi-condition MLE design matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect distant homologs using profile and structure-aware methods that go beyond standard BLAST. Use when sequence identity falls into the twilight zone (<35% pairwise), when BLAST fails to find homologs that should exist, when working at metagenomic scale (DIAMOND, MMseqs2), or when structure beats sequence (Foldseek). Covers PSI-BLAST (iterative PSSM), jackhmmer (iterative HMM), HHblits/HHsearch (profile-profile), DIAMOND, MMseqs2, and Foldseek (3Di structural alphabet, van Kempen 2024).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。