「validation」の検索結果

Isolate the root cause of ML performance drops, inconsistent evaluations, prediction errors, and training-serving mismatches across data, labels, splits, pipelines, models, metrics, and runtime behavior. Use when investigating a reproducible failure or regression, not routine model selection or general performance validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route data analysis and machine learning work to the right skill in this suite. Use when starting any analysis, modeling, validation, or reproducibility task and the matching specialized skill is not yet clear; not needed when one specific skill already clearly applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM, mainland/international residency). Enforces identity least-privilege, mechanical policy, data boundaries, residency, cost caps, network egress and observability, with official-source validation before any claim. Trigger on any cloud infrastructure design, review, Terraform plan, or LLM/agent deployment; the-architect routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a bug has multiple plausible causes across layers — competing hypotheses, validation loops, evidence-based conclusions — even when the user just says 'why is this happening?'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when documenting APIs — OpenAPI/Swagger, PHP attributes, Redocly validation, versioned specs — even when the user just says 'document this endpoint' without naming OpenAPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use BEFORE editing code that touches user data — traces the value from entry → validation → transformation → storage → egress, every hop cited with file:line.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when validation needs entry, business-logic, environment, and instrumentation guards so a bad value cannot reach the failure point — turns a local bug fix into a structural one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or reviewing a form — validation timing, error display, submission lifecycle, optimistic UI, dirty/pristine state, idempotency — even on 'why does submit double-fire?'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing API endpoint tests — integration tests, contract validation, response assertions, mocked external services — even when the user says 'test this route' without naming API testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extraia dados estruturados de respostas de LLM com validação Pydantic, tente novamente automaticamente extrações que falharem, analise JSON complexo com segurança de tipo e transmita resultados parciais com Instructor - biblioteca de saída estruturada testada em batalha

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controle saída de LLM com regex e gramáticas, garanta geração válida de JSON/XML/código, aplique formatos estruturados e construa fluxos de trabalho multi-etapas com Guidance - framework de geração restrita da Microsoft Research

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill when a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. Trigger for `.xlsx`, `.xls`, `.xlsm`, `.csv`, `.tsv`, workbooks, templates, trackers, models, dashboards, charts, formulas, data cleaning, formatting, validation, recalculation, and Google Sheets-targeted handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill whenever the project contains forms, inputs, selects, checkboxes, radio buttons, text areas, or any validation flow. Under no circumstances create a form without visible labels, error identification, and keyboard accessibility. Absolutely always associate every input with a label and provide clear, accessible error messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use to validate a spec artifact's decisions with the user across three contexts — a freshly-authored Feature Spec (idea-to-spec), an existing canonical spec before PBI decomposition (spec-to-pbi), or a refined idea + §8 test-specs (idea-to-pbi deep mode). Detects the context, walks every applicable validation category, and runs an exhaustive but budget-bounded blocking clarification gate so every non-obvious or conflicting decision is confirmed before the artifact drives downstream work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a repeatable process for researching and comparing companies. Use when the user wants a structured, reusable company-research workflow with objectives, sources, fields, and validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kova/OpenClaw validation: benchmarks, release gates, scenarios, perf reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or repair a project-local Inspector profile after INSPECTOR_PROFILE_REQUIRED, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INCOMPLETE, INSPECTOR_PROFILE_INVALID, or PROFILE_AUTHORING_REQUIRED, using Unity component source, custom Inspector evidence, serialized surfaces, and validation diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade or synchronize Agent Skills, or determine a Skill's source and ownership across runtimes and roots. Use only for those lifecycle decisions. Do not use for installation, creation or editing, validation, inventory, usage statistics, general audits, cleanup, packaging, publishing, or ordinary file and package work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WeChat Mini Program development skill for building, debugging, previewing, testing, publishing, and optimizing mini program projects. This skill should be used when users ask to create, develop, modify, debug, preview, test, deploy, publish, launch, review, or optimize WeChat Mini Programs, mini program pages, components, `tabBar`, routing, navigation, icon assets, project structure, project configuration, `project.config.json`, `appid` setup, device preview, real-device validation, WeChat Developer Tools Nightly workflows, `wechatide` CLI, WeChat IDE Skills/MCP, console/network debugging, `miniprogram-ci` preview/upload flows, or mini program release processes. It should also be used when users explicitly mention CloudBase, `wx.cloud`, Tencent CloudBase, 腾讯云开发, 微信云开发, or 云开发 in a mini program project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Invoice-Downloader work involves mailbox batch tests, truth audit, regression validation, P0/P1/P2 decisions, packaged frontend acceptance, or clean reruns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。