「evidence」の検索結果

Use when the user wants papers to consider for a graph gap or missing evidence need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a graph gap or Evidence Need should become a targeted paper-search contract or candidate lead list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Kuhn's paradigm theory to analyze scientific progress through the cycle of normal science, anomalies, crisis, and revolution. Use this skill when the user needs to understand why a field resists change, trace paradigm shifts in a discipline, analyze incommensurability between competing frameworks, or when they ask 'why do scientists ignore contradictory evidence', 'how do scientific revolutions happen', or 'why can't proponents of different paradigms agree'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply meta-analysis to synthesize effect sizes across multiple studies, assess heterogeneity, and evaluate publication bias. Use this skill when the user needs to combine findings from prior research, compare fixed-effect vs random-effects models, compute pooled effect sizes, or when they ask 'what does the overall evidence say', 'how do I combine results across studies', or 'is there publication bias'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply case study research design (Yin) to investigate how and why questions within real-life contexts using single or multiple case designs and triangulation. Use this skill when the user needs to choose between single and multiple case designs, apply holistic versus embedded units of analysis, triangulate evidence from multiple sources, or when they ask 'how should I structure a case study', 'single or multiple cases', or 'how do I ensure validity in case research'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Marketing Mix (4P/7P) framework to design tactical marketing decisions across Product, Price, Place, Promotion — plus People, Process, Physical Evidence for services. Use this skill when the user needs to plan a product launch, design a go-to-market strategy, or audit their marketing mix — even if they say 'how should we price this', 'where should we sell', or 'what's our go-to-market plan'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise audience-ready HTML paper presentations for lab meetings and journal clubs. Use when Codex needs source-grounded figures and tables, a fluent live-talk narrative, verified quotations, varied explanatory diagrams, presenter-paced reveals, or browser QA for evidence fidelity, interaction, responsive layout, and print.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, screen, deeply read, synthesize, and publish recent research papers for a user-specified topic, window, count, quality/attention balance, and language. Use for evidence-anchored literature digests, cross-paper comparisons, original-language excerpts, Chinese explanations, guided Feishu setup, or Feishu research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning, drafting, revising, compressing, or auditing conference rebuttals and author responses in OpenReview Markdown or PDF. Supports exact reviewer mapping, evidence and experiment integration, guided risk decisions, venue-format validation, and blind reviewer/AC audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing or fixing user-reported application bugs. Guides evidence-backed root-cause analysis from symptoms, screenshots, logs, provider failures, background tasks, storage, or desktop lifecycle behavior through a scoped patch and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, redrawing, or validating research-paper figures and tables, including Matplotlib plots, LaTeX tables, benchmarks, captions, legends, annotations, color, and typography. Preserves exact evidence and checks rendered PDFs for clipping, overlap, and readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before writing custom code or a research workflow when a maintained library, tool, skill, or proven pattern may already exist. Start with local reuse and targeted evidence; broaden to external research for new dependencies, new mechanisms, or uncertain external facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a white-box security review of Atlassian Forge apps using structured, Forge-specific security rules and evidence-driven reporting. Use when the user asks for a Forge security review, security audit, vuln assessment, pentest-style code review, authz review, tenant isolation analysis, web trigger hardening, or static analysis execution for a Forge app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and fix bugs, failing tests, regressions, build failures, or unexpected behavior using boundary localization, evidence, and bounded hypotheses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify code or product claims after changes using fresh, risk-matched evidence. Use before saying a bug is fixed, tests pass, requirements are met, or a branch is ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write balanced, evidence-based performance reviews for employees. Covers achievements, development areas, and goal setting using the SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) feedback model. Produces reviews that are fair, legally defensible, and growth-oriented. Use during annual or semi-annual review cycles. Do not use for disciplinary actions, PIPs, or compensation calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize month-end or quarter-end close blockers, reconciliations, owners, and evidence gaps into a routine control pack. Use when the work is finance close coordination and issue tracking. Do not use for accounting judgment, policy interpretation, or final technical accounting conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API security automation skill for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, and WebSocket APIs. Covers OpenAPI/AsyncAPI ingestion, authenticated fuzzing, OWASP API Top 10 (BOLA, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF), schema diffing, GraphQL introspection abuse, JWT and OAuth misuse, rate-limit and replay testing. Use to automate API assessments with safe, scoped, evidence-backed findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Purple team automation skill that links offensive emulation (Atomic Red Team, Caldera, Stratus Red Team, Leonidas) with detection validation, telemetry-gap analysis, and continuous control testing. Use to design adversary emulation plans tied to MITRE ATT&CK, execute safe tests in lab or controlled environments, and produce evidence-backed detection coverage reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure, diagnose, or optimize the persistent OpenClaw fleet, native CLI routing, skill loading, run evidence, and context recovery. Use for orchestration operations; product implementation uses its own relevant skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and detect synthetic media, including deepfake videos, AI-generated images, and cloned voice audio. Use this skill when investigating potential disinformation campaigns, verifying the authenticity of digital evidence, or assessing social engineering attacks leveraging synthetic media (e.g., vishing with voice clones, spear-phishing with deepfake video calls). Covers artifact analysis, frequency detection, metadata tracing, and automated detection tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages an Aikido security findings CSV against a local codebase. For each finding, reads the flagged file, traces the code path, and verdicts it as KEEP OPEN or CLOSE with a specific reason. Outputs a reviewed CSV and a self-contained HTML evidence report. Run this at the end of a pentest when an Aikido CSV is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。